BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair


          SB 1139 (Rubio) - Greenhouse gas: carbon capture and storage.
          
          Amended: May 2, 2012            Policy Vote: EQ 6-0, NR&W 8-1
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: May 24, 2012      Consultant: Marie Liu
          
          SUSPENSE FILE.
          
          
          Bill Summary: SB 1139 would require the Air Resources Board 
          (ARB) to adopt a quantification methodology for carbon capture 
          and storage (CCS) projects for geologic sequestration. This bill 
          would also require the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal 
          Resources (DOGGR) within the Department of Conservation to 
          regulate the injection of carbon dioxide at an enhanced oil 
          recovery project.

          Fiscal Impact: 
              Onetime costs of $1.1 million annually from the Air 
              Pollution Control Fund (special fund) in 2012-13 and 2013-14 
              for the development of a quantification methodology and 
              incorporation into the Cap and Trade regulations. 
              Ongoing costs of $1.3 million annually from the Air 
              Pollution Control Fund (special fund) beginning in 2014-15 
              for ARB's technical evaluation, approval, and monitoring of 
              CCS projects.
              Unknown, but at least in the hundreds of thousands of 
              dollars, from the Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Administrative 
              Fund (special fund) for DOGGR to provide monitoring and 
              oversight of CCS projects. 

          Background: Carbon sequestration is a term used to describe 
          processes that concentrate carbon dioxide and store it away from 
          the atmosphere. Geologic sequestration, or CCS, involves 
          collecting and purifying carbon dioxide from large point sources 
          and injecting it below ground for storage. There are two main 
          types of CCS in California: (1) injection of carbon dioxide into 
          saline formations that do not contain oil, gas, or other 
          hydrocarbons and (2) injection of carbon dioxide into oil 
          reservoirs, specifically though the use of enhanced oil 
          recovery, which are processes used to increase production from 
          oil and gas reservoirs. Activities related to the recovery of 








          SB 1139 (Rubio)
          Page 1


          oil and gas, including enhanced oil recovery, falls within the 
          broad authority of DOGGR.  

          Under the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 
          32), the Air Resources Board (ARB) is required to adopt 
          greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction measures to reduce 
          statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels. ARB is allowed to use 
          market-based mechanisms to comply with these regulations (i.e. a 
          cap and trade program).

          Existing law requires the California Public Utilities Commission 
          (PUC), in consultation with the California Energy Commission 
          (CEC) and the ARB, to establish the GHG emission performance 
          standards (EPS) which are the minimum performance requirements 
          for any long-term contract for baseload electricity generation 
          supplying power to Californian ratepayers. The EPS is required 
          to not consider carbon dioxide captured from a power plant if it 
          is permanently disposed of in a geological formation.

          Proposed Law: This bill would require the ARB to develop a 
          quantification methodology for CCS projects which can be used 
          for compliance obligations under AB 32 or the cap-and-trade 
          program by January 1, 2016. The ARB must consult with the PUC 
          and the CEC on the development of the methodology and its 
          incorporation into the EPS. The methodology must include methods 
          for enhanced oil recovery projects seeking to demonstrate 
          simultaneous sequestration of injected carbon dioxide subject to 
          specified conditions.

          This bill further requires DOGGR to regulate the injection of 
          carbon dioxide at an enhanced oil recovery project including an 
          enhanced oil recovery project seeking to demonstrate 
          simultaneous geologic sequestration of greenhouse gas. 

          This bill also defines ownership of the underground pore space 
          which may be used for the GHG storage and specifies that 
          pipelines used for the transportation of carbon dioxide is 
          within the jurisdiction of the State Fire Marshall.

          Related Legislation: SB 711 (Rubio) would change the regulation 
          of wells used for enhanced oil recovery and is currently in the 
          Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

          Staff Comments: This bill requires the ARB to develop a 








          SB 1139 (Rubio)
          Page 2


          methodology to quantify carbon dioxide that is sequestered into 
          geologic formations, which would be finalized through 
          regulation. The ARB estimates that it would require five 
          positions plus $300,000 in contracted support to develop the 
          methodology for a total of $1.1 million for 2012-13 and 2013-14. 
          Beginning in 2014-15, ARB would continue to need five positions 
          and $500,000 annually to start implementing the methodology 
          including technical evaluation, approval, and monitoring of 
          sequestration projects.

          DOGGR estimates that the costs of developing regulations 
          required by this bill to be absorbable in the first year. 
          However, the monitoring and oversight of such regulations are 
          unknown, but at least in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. 
          While DOGGR is aware that carbon dioxide is used in enhanced oil 
          recovery operations, the amount of carbon dioxide that is left 
          in the formation is not tracked. Also, staff notes that DOGGR 
          will have likely have role in all CCS projects, not just those 
          involving enhanced oil recovery, although this role is not fully 
          specified in this bill. These implementation costs are unknown 
          until ARB develops the required methodology. 

          The PUC and the CEC believe that their costs would be minor and 
          absorbable.

          Staff notes that the author has made an earlier commitment in 
          policy committee to require industry funding to pay for the full 
          cost of this bill's proposed program. Such amendments have not 
          yet been made. Staff notes that the "industry" involved in this 
          bill may be difficult to identify since CCS projects may be 
          undertaken by a range of industries. As such, it may be 
          difficult to delineate a group who should be responsible for 
          initial costs such as regulation development. However, a fee on 
          those conducting CCS projects could potentially cover ongoing 
          costs.