BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO: sb 1151
          SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN              AUTHOR:  steinberg
                                                         VERSION: 3/29/12
          Analysis by:  Carrie Cornwell                  FISCAL:  yes
          Hearing date:  April 24, 2012




          SUBJECT:

          Sustainable Economic Development and Housing Trust Fund

          DESCRIPTION:

          This bill permits local jurisdictions to use an alternative 
          process to administer the assets of their former redevelopment 
          agencies for economic development and housing purposes.  To do 
          so, the bill authorizes a Community Development and Housing 
          Joint Powers Authority to place redevelopment assets in a 
          Sustainable Economic Development and Housing Trust Fund and 
          requires a long-range asset management plan to govern that trust 
          fund.

          ANALYSIS:

          Historically, the Community Redevelopment Law allowed a local 
          government to establish a redevelopment area and capture all of 
          the increase in property taxes generated within the area 
          (referred to as "tax increment") over a period of decades.  The 
          law requires redevelopment agencies to deposit 20 percent of tax 
          increment into a Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (L&M fund) 
          to be used to increase, improve, and preserve the community's 
          supply of low and moderate income housing available at an 
          affordable housing cost.  

          In 2011, the Legislature enacted two bills, AB 26X (Blumenfield) 
          and AB 27X (Blumenfield), Chapters 5 and 6, respectively, of the 
          First Extraordinary Session.  AB 26X eliminated redevelopment 
          agencies and established procedures for winding down the 
          agencies, paying off enforceable obligations, and disposing of 
          agency assets.  AB 26X established successor agencies, typically 
          the city or county that established the agency, to take control 
          of all redevelopment agency assets, properties, and other items 
          of value.  Successor agencies are to dispose of an agency's 
          assets as directed by an oversight board, made up of 




          SB 1151 (STEINBERG)                                    Page 2

                                                                       


          representatives of local taxing entities, with the proceeds 
          transferred to the county auditor-controller for distribution to 
          taxing agencies within each county.

          AB 26X also included provisions allowing the host city or county 
          of a dissolving redevelopment agency to retain the housing 
          assets and functions previously performed by the agency, except 
          for funds on deposit in the agency's L&M fund, and thus become a 
          successor housing agency.  If the host city or county chooses 
          not to become the successor housing agency, a local housing 
          authority or the state's Department of Housing and Community 
          Development (HCD) may do so. 

          AB 27X allowed redevelopment agencies to avoid elimination if 
          they made payments to schools in the current budget year and in 
          future years.  In December 2011, the California Supreme Court in 
          California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos upheld AB 26X 
          and overturned 
          AB 27X.  As a result, all of the state's roughly 400 
          redevelopment agencies dissolved on February 1, 2012, and local 
          jurisdictions are in the process of implementing AB 26X's 
          provisions to distribute former redevelopment assets.

           This bill  :
          
          1.Provides that the AB 26X process for disposing of 
            redevelopment agency assets and remitting unencumbered 
            balances funds for distribution to the taxing entities does 
            not apply to a jurisdiction that has by August 1, 2012 formed 
            a Community Development and Housing Joint Powers Authority 
            (authority) pursuant to SB 1156 (Steinberg), which is also on 
            today's agenda.

          2.Requires each authority to administer a Sustainable Economic 
            Development and Housing Trust Fund to receive and hold the 
            former redevelopment agency's unencumbered funds, assets, and 
            properties.  The trust fund may also accept revenues from any 
            source and may include the proceeds from selling redevelopment 
            agency assets.  

          3.Allows an authority to use the trust fund for public or 
            private infrastructure needed for infill development, 
            affordable housing, land acquisitions, clean energy, 
            education, job training, transitional housing for former 
            inmates transferred to a county pursuant to the 2011 
            realignment, loans for development activities, and 




          SB 1151 (STEINBERG)                                    Page 3

                                                                       


            environmental mitigation, including cleaning up brownfield 
            sites.

          4.Directs an authority to prepare a long-range asset management 
            plan to govern the disposition and ongoing use of the 
            Sustainable Economic Development and Housing Trust Fund.  The 
            plan must:

                 Inventory all assets, assess the value and purpose of 
               acquisition of these assets, and determine the current 
               value of real property assets.

                 Address the use or disposition of all of the assets in 
               the trust.

                 Outline a strategy for maximizing the long-term social 
               and monetary value of the real property and assets in the 
               trust consistent with the provisions of SB 1156 and so as 
               to create high wage and high skill jobs, plus affordable 
               housing.  

          1.Requires the authority to submit this long-range asset 
            management plan to the Department of Finance (DOF) for 
            approval by December 1, 2012.  DOF may approve the plan or 
            return it for revisions by December 31, 2012.  An authority 
            must update and resubmit its plan annually to DOF by each 
            December 1 thereafter.  DOF, as a condition of granting its 
            approval, may require that K-14 schools and local agencies 
            receive a minimal amount of funding from the dissolution of 
            assets.

          2.Requires any entity receiving financial support under this 
            bill or SB 1156 to incorporate into any and all agreements a 
            jobs plan, which shall describe how the project will create 
            construction careers that pay prevailing wages and a program 
            for community outreach, local hire, and job training.
          

          COMMENTS:

           1.Purpose  .  AB 26X requires successor agencies, at the direction 
            of their oversight boards, to dispose of the former RDA assets 
            "expeditiously and in a manner aimed at maximizing value" but 
            offers no guidance on how to achieve this objective.  Absent 
            such guidance, the author is concerned that the result may be 
            the "fire sale" of real property assets of the former 




          SB 1151 (STEINBERG)                                    Page 4

                                                                       


            redevelopment agencies and a transfer of wealth from the 
            public to private sectors.  To address this concern, this bill 
            establishes Sustainable Economic Development and Housing Trust 
            Funds to serve as repositories for the assets of the former 
            redevelopment agencies, including cash, liquid investments, 
            and real and personal property expected to be valued in the 
            billions of dollars.  City and county joint powers authorities 
            would manage these trusts for future economic development and 
            housing activities.  

            The bill requires joint powers authorities to develop Long 
            Range Asset Management Plans to maximize the social and 
            economic value of the former redevelopment agency assets for 
            the public sector.   The plans would include detailed 
            valuation and environmental contamination information on a 
            parcel-by-parcel basis and facilitate the integration of 
            properties into local land use plans.  The bill authorizes the 
            use of the trust funds to finance public and private 
            infrastructure needed for infill development, affordable 
            housing, environmental mitigation, former military bases, 
            clean energy and energy efficiency, as well as educational, 
            labor-management, and job training programs leading to high 
            skill, high wage jobs.

           2.Definitions needed  .  This bill directs that these trust funds 
            receive and hold redevelopment assets and then use those 
            assets for public or private infrastructure needed for infill 
            development, affordable housing, land acquisitions, clean 
            energy, education, job training, transitional housing for 
            former inmates transferred to a county pursuant to the 2011 
            realignment, loans for development activities, and 
            environmental mitigation, including cleaning up brownfield 
            sites.  The bill, however, does not provide definitions of 
            these terms.  Definitions are necessary to ensure that the use 
            of these funds comports with state goals and polices.  In 
            particular, existing redevelopment law provides extensive 
            definitions and rules on the provision of affordable housing 
            to ensure that it is provided to income-qualified individuals 
            in proportion to their population in the community.

           3.Two housing agencies  .   It is unclear how the affordable 
            housing functions of the authority will interact with the work 
            of the successor housing agencies established by AB 26X.  The 
            committee may wish to amend this bill to ensure that all of 
            the housing assets, including the L&M balances, are located in 
            one entity by allowing the authority to contribute its 




          SB 1151 (STEINBERG)                                    Page 5

                                                                       


            resources to the housing successor entity.
           
          4.Who is in charge  ?  AB 26X gives oversight boards broad 
            discretion to approve or disapprove successor agencies' 
            actions.  Each successor agency must, every six months, draft 
            a list of enforceable obligations that are payable during a 
            subsequent six-month period, to which the oversight board must 
            agree.  This bill does allow a Community Development and 
            Housing Joint Powers Authority to use funds in the Sustainable 
            Economic Development and Housing Trust Fund to pay a former 
            redevelopment agency's liabilities and does not limit this 
            authority to paying for liabilities that are recognized by an 
            oversight board as enforceable obligations.  One could see how 
            this bill could undermine the oversight board process by 
            allowing an authority to use proceeds from former 
            redevelopment assets to pay for redevelopment liabilities that 
            an oversight board would not recognize as an enforceable 
            obligation.  The committee may wish to amend this bill to 
            clarify the role of the oversight board when a community forms 
            an authority under this bill.
                
            5.Urgency needed  .  This bill offers communities an alternative 
            approach to managing former redevelopment agency assets if 
            they establish an authority before August 1, 2012.  This 
            timing is necessary because successor agencies are working now 
            to distribute those assets.  But because this bill does not 
            include an urgency clause, its provisions will not take effect 
            until January 1, 2013.  The author or committee may wish to 
            consider amending the bill to include an urgency clause.

           6.Technical amendments  .  

                 On page 8, line 25, after the "and" insert "is" 
                 On page 8, line 29, delete "article" and insert "this 
               part or Part 1.86 (commencing with Section 34191.1)"
                 On page 9, lines 14-15, delete "joint powers authority 
               specified in and consistent with" and insert "Community 
               Development and Housing Joint Powers Authority established 
               pursuant to"
                 On page 9, line 32, delete "34191.2" and insert 
               "34191.15"
           
          1.Committee of second referral  . The Rules Committee referred 
            this bill to the Governance and Finance Committee and to the 
            Transportation and Housing Committee.  This bill passed that 
            committee on April 18 by a 6 to 3 vote.  The Governance and 




          SB 1151 (STEINBERG)                                    Page 6

                                                                       


            Finance Committee's analysis and hearing of the bill dealt 
            primarily with the provisions of the bill related to the local 
            government finance provisions, leaving the housing provisions 
            for review in this committee.
          
          POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the committee before noon on 
          Wednesday,                                             April 18, 
          2012)

               SUPPORT:  BRIDGE Housing
                         California Infill Builders Association
                         California Labor Federation
                         California State Association of Counties
                         DMB Pacific Ventures
                         Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy
                         Mission Bay Development Group

          
               OPPOSED:  None received.