BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1164|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                    CONSENT


          Bill No:  SB 1164
          Author:   Emmerson (R)
          Amended:  3/26/12
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 5/1/12
          AYES:  Evans, Harman, Blakeslee, Corbett, Leno


           SUBJECT  :    Professional liability insurers:  immunity

           SOURCE  :     California Association of Professional 
          Liability Insurers


           DIGEST  :    This bill extends the sunset date from January 
          1, 2013 to January 1, 2016 of limited liability immunity 
          for professional liability insurers issuing non-renewal 
          notice statements, which specify the reason for the 
          nonrenewal, sent to a healthcare provider policyholder.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law requires a professional liability 
          insurer who intends not to renew a policy, or to condition 
          a policy renewal as specified, to give written notice of 
          the nonrenewal and the reasons for the nonrenewal at least 
          60 days, but not more than 120 days, in advance of the end 
          of the policy period.  (Insurance Code (INS) Section 678.1)

          Existing law, until January 1, 2013, provides that there is 
          no liability on the part of, and no cause of action of any 
          nature shall arise against, a professional liability 
          insurer, who provides insurance to health care providers, 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1164
                                                                Page 
          2

          for any statement made in any of the following: 

            a written notice of nonrenewal, or any other oral or 
             written communication specifying the reasons for 
             nonrenewal of a policy issued to a health care provider; 

            any communication providing information pertaining to 
             the nonrenewal; or 

            evidence submitted at any court proceeding or informal 
             inquiry in which the nonrenewal is an issue.  (INS 
             Section 678.3)

          Existing law, until January 1, 2013, provides that the 
          above immunity from liability extends to statements made by 
          a professional liability insurer's authorized 
          representatives, agents, or employees or any licensed 
          authorized insurance agent or broker and does not extend to 
          statements shown to have been made in bad faith.  (Id.) 

          This bill extends the sunset date of these provisions to 
          January 1, 2016.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No   
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/2/12)

          California Association of Professional Liability Insurers 
          (source)

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author writes:  "Over the 
          years, the California Insurance Code has been amended to 
          require an insurer to give written notice of a policy 
          cancellation (Insurance Code Section 677.2) and nonrenewal 
          (Section 678.1).  The written notice must contain the 
          reasons for the cancellation or nonrenewal.  Unfortunately, 
          there were a number of lawsuits filed against insurers 
          alleging slander or defamation arising from compliance with 
          the above statutory requirement.  In 1968, Insurance Code 
          Section 667 was added to provide an immunity for notices of 
          cancellation of auto policies, and in 1969 the section was 
          amended to cover nonrenewal as well.  Insurance Code 
          Section 679 (which covers property and other commercial 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1164
                                                                Page 
          3

          insurers) provides that insurers or their agents are not 
          liable for any statement made in the cancellation of a 
          policy, unless the statement was made in bad faith with 
          malice in fact.  Unlike Section 667, however, Section 679 
          does not specifically address the nonrenewal of a policy.  
          Because Section 679 was not amended to parallel the . . . 
          statute covering auto policies, professional liability 
          insurers continued to be threatened with and occasionally 
          sued for defamation or libel arising from compliance with 
          the requirement to give a written notice and reasons for 
          nonrenewal.  This bill would extend the life of Section 
          678.3, which was enacted to rectify this problem."

          The California Association of Professional Liability 
          Insurers, the sponsor of this bill, expresses its desire 
          for an extension of the sunset by asserting that the 
          immunity provided by AB 1123 (Wyland), Chapter 327, 
          Statutes of 2005, to insurers who issue professional 
          liability policies to health care providers "promotes more 
          candor in communications made to the insured and should 
          continue to be preserved."


          RJG:kc  5/3/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****

















                                                           CONTINUED