BILL ANALYSIS �
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1182|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 1182
Author: Leno (D)
Amended: 4/9/12
Vote: 21
SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE : 5-2, 4/24/12
AYES: Hancock, Calderon, Liu, Price, Steinberg
NOES: Anderson, Harman
SUBJECT : Medical marijuana access and distribution
SOURCE : Author
DIGEST : This bill (1) provides that a cooperative,
collective or other business entity that operates within
the Attorney General's (AG) guidelines shall not be subject
to prosecution for marijuana possession or commerce, as
specified; and (2) provides that where such an entity
operates within the AG's guidelines, the entity and its
employees, officers and members shall not be subject to
prosecution for marijuana commerce because the entity or
its employees, officers, or members received compensation
for actual expenses incurred in carrying out activities in
compliance with the guidelines.
ANALYSIS :
Existing law:
The Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (Act) (Health and Safety
CONTINUED
SB 1182
Page
2
Code (HSC)
Section 11362.5) - includes the following purposes:
1. To ensure that seriously ill Californians have the right
to obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes where
such use is deemed appropriate and has been recommended
by a physician for treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS,
chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine,
or any other illness for which marijuana provides
relief.
2. To ensure that patients and primary caregivers who
obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes upon the
recommendation of a physician are not subject to
criminal prosecution.
3. To encourage the federal and state governments to
implement a plan to provide for the safe and affordable
distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical
need of marijuana. (HSC Section 11362.5, subd.
(b)(1)(A)-(C))
The Act also provides:
1. The Act shall not be construed to supersede legislation
prohibiting persons from engaging in conduct that
endangers others, or to condone the diversion of
marijuana for non-medical purposes. (HSC Section
11362.5, subd. (b)(2))
2. No physician in California shall be punished or denied
any right or privilege for recommending medical
marijuana to a patient. (HSC Section 11362.5, subd.
(c))
3. Penal laws relating to the possession of marijuana and
the cultivation of marijuana shall not apply to a
patient, or to a patient's primary caregiver, who
possesses or cultivates marijuana for the personal
medical purposes of the patient upon the written or oral
recommendation or approval of a physician. (HSC Section
11362.5, subd. (d))
Existing law provides that qualified patients, persons with
CONTINUED
SB 1182
Page
3
valid identification cards, and the designated primary
caregivers of qualified patients and persons with
identification cards, who associate within the State of
California in order collectively or cooperatively to
cultivate marijuana for medical purposes, shall not solely
on the basis of that fact be subject to state criminal
sanctions under existing law. (HSC Section 11362.775)
Existing law directs the AG to develop and adopt
appropriate guidelines to ensure the security and
nondiversion of medical marijuana. (HSC Section 11362.81,
subd. (d).) Section IV of the guidelines concern
collectives and cooperatives.
Existing law prohibits any medical marijuana cooperative,
collective, dispensary, operator, establishment, or
provider who possess, cultivates, or distributes medical
marijuana, as specified, from being located within 600 feet
of a school. There are specified exceptions for medical or
elder care facilities, local ordinances adopted prior to
enactment of the state standard and for later adopted
ordinances that are more restrictive than state law. (HSC
Section 11362.768)
Existing law allows cities or other local governing bodies
to adopt and enforce local ordinances that regulate the
location, operation, or establishment of a medical
marijuana cooperative or collective, as follows:
1. A local government entity may enforce a medical
marijuana ordinance through civil or criminal remedies
and actions.
2. A local government entity may enact other laws
consistent with the Medical Marijuana Program, as
specified. (HSC Section 11362.83)
This bill provides that for any medical marijuana
collective, cooperative, or other business entities that
comply with medical marijuana guidelines published by the
AG, the following shall apply:
1. The cooperative, collective or businesses entity, and
the employees, officers and members thereof shall be
CONTINUED
SB 1182
Page
4
exempt from criminal prosecution and nuisance abatement
actions, as specified.
2. The fact that a cooperative, collective or businesses
entity, including an employee, officer or member
thereof, receives compensation for actual expenses for
activities carried out within the guidelines published
by the AG shall not be subject to prosecution under HSC
Sections 11359 and 11360.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No
Local: No
SUPPORT : (Verified 4/25/12)
American Civil Liberties Union
Americans for Safe Access
California NORML
California Public Defenders Association
County of Mendocino
Crusaders for Patients Rights
Drug Policy Alliance
Lawmen Protecting Patients
Marijuana Policy Project
The Greater Los Angeles Collective Alliance
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author:
Senate Bill 1182 will clarify the legality of medical
cannabis collectives, cooperatives, and other business
entities that are organized and operated in compliance
with the Guidelines For The Security And Non-Diversion of
Marijuana Grown For Medical Use issued by the Attorney
General in 2008. The bill also clarifies the rights of
these entities and their officers, employees and members
to receive compensation pursuant to and consistent with
statute and the guidelines of the Attorney General.
The legality of medical marijuana collectives,
cooperatives, and other business entities is ambiguous
under current state law resulting in needless arrests and
prosecutions. Lack of certainty in the law creates
confusion on the part of local elected officials who
increasingly choose to ban collectives and cooperatives
CONTINUED
SB 1182
Page
5
rather than adopt reasonable regulations that protect
public safety, prevent neighborhood nuisances and provide
for safe access for qualified patients and their
designated primary caregivers.
SB 1182 provides a focused solution that clarifies
elements of state law. This simple fix is compatible
with, and may be enacted independently of, omnibus
legislation that may provide a more comprehensive
solution to state medical marijuana issues. While it is
beyond our reach to resolve
the conflict in federal and state law, there is no valid
reason to further delay resolving existing ambiguities in
state law that are within our power to fix.
RJG:kc 4/25/12 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****
CONTINUED