BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 1191
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1191 (Simitian)
          As Amended August 7, 2012
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :23-13  
           
           JUDICIARY           7-3                                         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Feuer, Atkins, Dickinson, |     |                          |
          |     |Huber, Monning,           |     |                          |
          |     |Wieckowski,               |     |                          |
          |     |Bonnie Lowenthal          |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Wagner, Gorell, Jones     |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Requires disclosure to prospective tenants when the 
          owner of certain residential property receives a notice of 
          default (NOD).  Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Requires specified landlords who have received a NOD that has 
            not been rescinded to notify a prospective tenant of that 
            default in writing prior to executing a lease agreement for 
            the property.  

          2)Provides that a violation of the bill would void the lease at 
            the election of the tenant and entitle the tenant to recovery 
            of twice the monthly rent or twice the actual damages, 
            whichever is greater if the tenancy is terminated, and all 
            prepaid rent, in addition to any other legal remedy available 
            to the tenant.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  None
           
          COMMENTS  :  The author explains the reason for the bill as 
          follows:

               Senate Bill 1191 helps ensure that Californians make rental 
               decisions with full and accurate information about the 
               property that may become their home.  While it seems like 
               common courtesy to tell someone that the apartment they're 








                                                                  SB 1191
                                                                  Page  2


               considering is in foreclosure, it's not legally required. 
               As a result, tenants often sign leases only to find out 
               that in just a few days or weeks, the property will be up 
               for auction. There are several risks associated with 
               leasing a property in foreclosure.

               First, in advance of the foreclosure sale, tenants often 
               experience decreased services from landlords facing 
               financial difficulties.  For example, owners may fail to 
               pay utilities, or ignore requests for maintenance or 
               repairs. 

               Second, after the foreclosure sale, tenants face a 
               tremendous amount of uncertainty. Tenants may not know to 
               whom they should send rent, or direct requests regarding 
               the property. Similarly, tenants may not be aware of the 
               protections guaranteed to them under federal and state law, 
               and so may feel pressured to vacate or to terminate leases 
               through "cash for keys" offers. Third, there are several 
               circumstances where a tenant's lease may be invalidated by 
               the foreclosure sale. For example, if the new owner intends 
               to move into the property the tenant will have only 90 days 
               to vacate, regardless of the terms of the lease. In 
               addition, the federal Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act 
               - and pending legislation in California - do not apply to 
               certain leases, meaning that tenants may face eviction 
               before their lease concludes. 

               Fourth, in practice it is especially difficult for tenants 
               to recover security deposits during or after a foreclosure. 
                The defaulting landlord may lack the financial resources 
               to return it, and the new owner - though legally obligated 
               to return the deposit - is often reluctant to do so.  
               Finally, tenants in recently foreclosed properties often 
               face exposure to bad actors.  Tenant advocates report that 
               their clients are frequently subject to harassment and 
               misinformation from individuals seeking to remove tenants 
               from recently foreclosed properties.

          Tenants Together writes in support, "This is an important tenant 
          protection bill.  The fact that the foreclosure process is 
          underway is a material fact that should be disclosed to renters. 
           A landlord's foreclosure has significant impacts on tenants and 
          their rights.  Foreclosure may affect the length of the tenancy, 








                                                                  SB 1191
                                                                  Page  3


          the housing conditions experienced by tenants, and the 
          likelihood that tenants get back their security deposits after 
          vacating.  It is only fair that tenants be notified of 
          foreclosure activity so they can make an informed choice about 
          their housing."

          The federal Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 (PTFA) 
          generally requires a successor in interest in a property subject 
          to foreclosure to provide bona fide tenants with a 90-day notice 
          to vacate and, with limited exceptions, to honor the tenant's 
          lease until the end of the lease term.  In 2010, the President 
          signed legislation extending the PTFA until December 31, 2014, 
          and clarifying that its protections extend to tenants who have 
          entered into leases before the date on which complete title is 
          transferred as the result of a foreclosure.  

          The PTFA fundamentally changed the obligations of subsequent 
          owners of foreclosed properties (usually the foreclosing entity) 
          by modifying the general rule that foreclosure extinguishes the 
          lease of any tenant in the property.  While the notice provided 
          by this bill responds to the situation where a tenant signs a 
          lease after an NOD has been recorded and before the sale of a 
          foreclosed property - a sale that previously would have 
          extinguished the lease - the recent protection of those leases 
          under federal law changes the effect of this bill from one that 
          warns tenants of a situation that would extinguish their lease 
          to one that informs tenants of information about the property 
          they are renting.

          This bill seeks to increase tenant protections by requiring a 
          landlord to give prospective tenants a written notice of the 
          existence of an outstanding notice of default.  Unlike the 
          notice required under existing state law for a notice of sale, 
          this notification would be provided to prospective - not 
          existing - tenants, and the notice would inform prospective 
          tenants of the first step in the non-judicial foreclosure 
          process as opposed to the notice of sale, which tenants are 
          notified of under existing law and is provided at a minimum of 
          three to six months after the NOD.  

          A number of landlord associations oppose the bill, arguing that 
          it unfairly targets owners of smaller properties, is unduly 
          punitive, will inappropriately discourage tenants from renting 
          available properties, and provides money damages without a 








                                                                  SB 1191
                                                                  Page  4


          showing of harm.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Kevin G. Baker / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 
                                                                FN: 0004596