BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 1206
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1206 (Walters)
          As Amended August 6, 2012
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :37-0  
           
           JUDICIARY           9-0         APPROPRIATIONS      17-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Feuer, Wagner, Atkins,    |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey,          |
          |     |Dickinson, Gorell, Huber, |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |
          |     |Monning, Wieckowski,      |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |
          |     |Bonnie Lowenthal          |     |Davis, Donnelly, Gatto,   |
          |     |                          |     |Hall, Hill, Lara,         |
          |     |                          |     |Mitchell, Nielsen, Norby, |
          |     |                          |     |Solorio, Wagner           |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Jones                     |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY :  Limits passport application for children during 
          dissolution proceedings and allows a court to order the freezing 
          of certain assets when it issues a protective custody warrant 
          for a child.  Specifically,  this bill  : 

          1)Provides that, in a dissolution proceeding, parents are 
            restricted from applying for a passport or replacement 
            passport for any minor child without written consent from the 
            other parent or a court order.  
             
           2)Provides that a protective custody warrant issued by a court 
            to secure the recovery of an unlawfully detained or concealed 
            child may also contain an order to freeze the California 
            assets, defined as funds held in a California financial 
            institution, of the party alleged to be in possession of the 
            child.  Provides that any order to freeze assets may, upon a 
            noticed motion, be terminated, modified or vacated by a court.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires, upon application for dissolution or legal 
            separation, that the summons contain a temporary restraining 








                                                                  SB 1206
                                                                  Page  2


            order (TRO) restraining both parties from removing the minor 
            child from the state without the prior written consent of the 
            other party or an order of the court.  

          2)Requires, under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and 
            Enforcement Act, state courts to respect and assist in the 
            enforcement of valid custody orders of other states and 
            countries, including assisting in the recovery of children 
            abducted by noncustodial parents.  
           
           3)Implements, under the federal International Child Abduction 
            Remedies Act, the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of 
            International Child Abduction, which requires signatory 
            countries, including the U.S., to return abducted children to 
            the state or country of lawful custody.  

          4)Requires a court, in cases which the court becomes aware of 
            facts indicating a possible risk of abduction, to determine 
            whether measures are needed to prevent the abduction of a 
            child.  In determining whether a risk of abduction exists, 
            requires the court to consider, among other things, whether a 
            party: 

             a)   Has previously committed or threatened certain actions, 
               including taking or concealing a child in violation of 
               another person's custody rights;

             b)   Lacks strong ties to this state;

             c)   Has strong ties to another state or country, including 
               foreign citizenship;

             d)   Has no financial reason to remain in this state;

             e)   Has engaged in planning activities that would facilitate 
               a child's removal from the state;

             f)   Has a history of lack of parental cooperation, domestic 
               violence, or child abuse; and,

             g)   Has a criminal record.  

          5)Provides, if the court makes a finding that there is a need 
            for preventative measures after considering the factors in 4) 








                                                                  SB 1206
                                                                  Page  3


            above, the court must consider taking one or more of the 
            following measures to prevent abduction of the child:

             a)   Ordering supervised visitation;

             b)   Requiring a parent to post a bond;

             c)   Restricting either parent's right to remove the child 
               from the county, the state or the country;

             d)   Restricting the custodial parent's right to relocate 
               with the child, as specified;

             e)   Requiring the surrender of passports and prohibiting a 
               parent from applying for a new passport for the child;

             f)   Requiring a party to register a California order in 
               another state as a prerequisite to allowing a child to 
               travel to that state;

             g)   Requiring a party taking a child on a foreign visit to 
               provide the child's travel itinerary, copies of round-trip 
               airplane tickets, a list of addresses and telephone numbers 
               where the child can be reached at all times, and an open 
               air ticket for the left-behind parent in case the child is 
               not returned; and,

             h)   Authorizing law enforcement assistance.  

          6)Provides that upon request of the district attorney, the court 
            may issue a protective custody warrant to secure the recovery 
            of an unlawfully detained or concealed child.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, costs associated with this legislation would be minor 
          and absorbable within existing resources. 
           
          COMMENTS  :  The Synclair-Cannon Act, passed by the Legislature in 
          2002 in response to child abductions by parents, takes a 
          preventive approach to preventing abductions, requiring courts 
          in custody or visitation proceedings to consider specified 
          factors indicating a risk of abduction and implement specified 
          preventive measures.  (AB 2441 (Bates), Chapter 856, Statutes of 
          2002.)  Over the past decade, these provisions have dictated the 








                                                                  SB 1206
                                                                  Page  4


          standard California courts use to determine and impose necessary 
          restrictions when a risk of parental child abduction exists.

          International child abductions are challenging to prevent with 
          state law alone.  Accordingly, federal law and international 
          agreements have attempted to address this problem.  Despite 
          lawmakers' efforts, parental child abductions to foreign 
          countries have almost doubled since 2006.  This bill seeks to 
          add protections to existing law to further prevent international 
          parental child abduction. 

          Under existing law, parties in dissolution or custody 
          proceedings must obtain consent from the opposing party or an 
          order from the court before taking a child out of state.  This 
          bill restrains parents from applying for a new or replacement 
          passport for a minor child without either the prior written 
          consent of the other parent or a court order authorizing the 
          application.  This provision adds a layer of protection against 
          international child abduction without burdening the family law 
          courts.   
           
          Current law provides that a court, at the request of a district 
          attorney, may issue a protective custody warrant for a child who 
          has been abducted.  This bill authorizes the court to include in 
          the protective custody warrant an order to freeze the assets of 
          the party alleged to be in possession of the child.  The 
          author's intent is to prevent a party alleged to be in unlawful 
          possession of a child from having immediate access to money, 
          thereby making continued concealment of the child more 
          difficult.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :  Leora Gershenzon / JUD. / (916) 319-2334


                                                                FN: 0004629