BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1210|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1210
          Author:   Lieu (D)
          Amended:  8/20/12
          Vote:     27

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/17/12
          AYES:  Hancock, Anderson, Calderon, Harman, Liu, Price, 
            Steinberg

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 5/24/12
          AYES:  Kehoe, Walters, Alquist, Dutton, Lieu, Price, 
            Steinberg

           SENATE FLOOR  :  38-0, 5/31/12
          AYES:  Alquist, Anderson, Berryhill, Blakeslee, Calderon, 
            Cannella, Corbett, Correa, De Le�n, DeSaulnier, Dutton, 
            Emmerson, Evans, Fuller, Gaines, Hancock, Harman, 
            Hernandez, Huff, Kehoe, La Malfa, Leno, Lieu, Liu, 
            Lowenthal, Negrete McLeod, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Rubio, 
            Simitian, Steinberg, Vargas, Walters, Wolk, Wright, 
            Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Runner, Strickland

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  79-0, 8/22/12 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Collection of criminal fines and penalties

           SOURCE  :     California District Attorneys Association
                      Crime Victims Action Alliance 
                      Los Angeles County District Attorneys Office

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1210
                                                                Page 
          2


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the court to assess a 
          post-release community supervision (PRCS) or 
          mandatory-supervision revocation fine in the same amount as 
          that imposed for the restitution fine and authorizes local 
          agencies to collect them.  

           Assembly Amendments  (1) require the court to assess an 
          additional postrelease community supervision revocation 
          restitution fine or mandatory supervision restitution fine, 
          as specified; and (2) provide guidelines if the county 
          board of supervisors designates the county sheriff as the 
          collection agency.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing provisions in the California 
          Constitution state that all persons who suffer losses as a 
          result of criminal activity shall have the right to 
          restitution from the perpetrators of these crimes.  
          Restitution shall be ordered in every case unless 
          compelling and extraordinary reasons exist to the contrary. 
           The Legislature shall adopt provisions to implement this 
          section during the calendar year following adoption of this 
          section.  (California Constitution, Article 1, Section 
          28(b))

          Existing law states legislative intent that a victim of 
          crime who incurs any economic loss as a result of the 
          commission of a crime shall receive restitution directly 
          from any defendant convicted of that crime.  (Penal Code 
          (PEN) Section 1202.4, subd. (a)(1))

          Existing law provides that where a defendant is committed 
          to prison and subject to parole, the court shall impose a 
          separate parole restitution fine in the same amount as the 
          restitution fine itself.  This additional parole revocation 
          restitution fine is not subject to penalty assessments, as 
          specified, or a specified state surcharge, and shall be 
          suspended unless the person's parole is revoked.  Parole 
          revocation restitution fine moneys are deposited in the 
          Restitution Fund in the State Treasury.  (PEN Section 
          1202.45)

          Existing law generally provides for the enforcement of 
          fines, including restitution fines, as specified, and 







                                                               SB 1210
                                                                Page 
          3

          provides that any "portion of a restitution order that 
          remains unsatisfied after a defendant is no longer on 
          probation or parole is enforceable by the victim pursuant 
          to this section."  (PEN Section 1214)

          Existing law provides for the Secretary of the Department 
          of Corrections and Rehabilitation to make deductions from 
          an inmate's wages and trust account deposits and 
          transferred for deposit in the Restitution Fund where a 
          prisoner owes a restitution fine, as specified.  (PEN 
          Section 2085.5)

          This bill:  

          1. Requires the court to assess a PRCS-revocation fine or a 
             mandatory-supervision revocation fine in the same amount 
             as that imposed for the restitution fine.

          2. States that the PRCS-revocation fine and 
             mandatory-supervision revocation fines are suspended 
             unless the terms of PRCS or mandatory supervision are 
             violated and the defendant is incarcerated in the county 
             jail for that violation.

          3. Provides that the PRCS-revocation fine and the 
             mandatory-supervision revocation fine are not subject to 
             penalty assessments.

          4. Specifies that the fine money shall be deposited in the 
             restitution fund.

          5. Provides that any part of a restitution fine that 
             remains unsatisfied after a defendant is no longer on 
             PRCS or mandatory supervision is enforceable by the 
             California Victims Compensation and Government Claims 
             Board (VCGCB).

          6. Provides that any part of a restitution order that 
             remains unsatisfied after a defendant is no longer on 
             PRCS or mandatory supervision is enforceable by the 
             victim.

          7. States that local collection programs may continue to 
             enforce victim restitution orders once a defendant is no 







                                                               SB 1210
                                                                Page 
          4

             longer on probation, PRCS, or mandatory supervision.

          8. Specifies that the period for enforcement of judgments 
             found in Civil Procedure Code Sections 683.010 et seq. 
             does not apply to court-ordered fines, forfeitures, 
             penalties, fees, or assessments.

          9. Provides that if the board of supervisors chooses to 
             designate the county sheriff as the collecting agency, 
             it must first obtain the concurrence of the county 
             sheriff.

          10.Authorizes the agency designated by the board of 
             supervisors in the county of incarceration to deduct 20% 
             to 50% from the wages and trust account deposits of a 
             county-jail inmate serving a sentence under realignment 
             and owing a restitution fine, and to transfer that 
             amount to the VCGCB for deposit in the restitution fund. 
              

          11.Authorizes the agency designated by the board of 
             supervisors in the county of incarceration to deduct 20% 
             to 50% from the wages and trust account deposits of a 
             county-jail inmate serving a sentence under realignment 
             and owing a victim restitution order, and to transfer 
             that amount to the VCGCB for payment to the victim or to 
             pay the victim directly.  

          12.Requires that the sentencing court be provided a record 
             of payments made to the crime victim and to the 
             restitution fund.

          13.Allows the agency designated by the board of supervisors 
             in the county of incarceration to withhold an 
             administrative fee to be held in a special deposit 
             account for the purposes of reimbursing administrative 
             and support costs of the restitution program, as 
             specified.

          14.Directs the local agency designated by the board of 
             supervisors to collect the restitution order first when 
             a county-jail inmate serving a sentence under 
             realignment owes both a restitution fine and a 
             restitution order.







                                                               SB 1210
                                                                Page 
          5


          15.Allows the garnishment of any compensatory or punitive 
             damages awarded to an defendant placed on PRCS or on 
             mandatory supervision in connection with a civil action 
             brought against any federal, state, or local jail or 
             prison to satisfy outstanding restitution orders or 
             fines.

          16.Allows a victim who does not timely provide a current 
             address to the VCGCB to provide documentation to the 
             local agency designated by the board of supervisors 
             which in turn may verify that money was in fact 
             collected by VCGCB on the victim's behalf.  Upon receipt 
             of verified information, the VCGCB shall transmit 
             restitution revenues to the victim. 

          17.States that juvenile court orders regarding fines, 
             penalties, bail, forfeiture, and victim restitution, can 
             now be referred to the Franchise Tax Board for 
             collection.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:

          1. No state cost.

          2. Unknown significant increase, in the millions of 
             dollars, to the state Restitution Fund to the extent 
             local administration and collection efforts are 
             successful.  Assuming local administration and 
             collection efforts are moderately successful, 
             Restitution Fund revenue should remain relatively 
             consistent with recent levels.   

          3. Unknown, potentially significant, nonreimbursable costs 
             to local governments - likely county sheriff offices - 
             for additional workload to create and administer 
             collection efforts.  Several county sheriff offices have 
             expressed reservations regarding workload that may 
             exceed the allowed administrative deductions from inmate 
             funds.  While this bill only authorizes such collection 
             efforts, should county boards task sheriffs' offices 







                                                               SB 1210
                                                                Page 
          6

             with these responsibilities, sheriffs would presumably 
             bear any costs that exceed administrative deductions.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/22/12)

          California District Attorneys Association (co-source)
          Crime Victims Action Alliance (co-source)
          Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office (co-source)
          California Police Chiefs Association
          California State Association of Counties 
          Chief Probation Officers of California
          Crime Victims United of California
          Peace Officers Research Association of California

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author:

             Last year, AB 109 realigned public safety services in 
             California.  As part of the Realignment plan thousands 
             of convicted felons are no longer being sent to the 
             California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 
             (CDCR), instead they are being housed in local jails.  
             Unfortunately, the Realignment plan failed to give 
             counties the authority to collect restitution for 
             victims from these convicted felons.  

             SB 1210 corrects this oversight by providing counties 
             with the authority to collect restitution from these 
             offenders in order to help the victims of their crimes 
             receive the restitution they are rightfully due.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  79-0, 8/22/12
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, 
            Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 
            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, 
            Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Davis, Dickinson, 
            Donnelly, Eng, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, 
            Beth Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gatto, Gordon, Gorell, 
            Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hill, 
            Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Lara, 
            Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mansoor, Mendoza, Miller, 
            Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, Norby, 
            Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel P�rez, Portantino, Silva, 
            Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, Valadao, 







                                                               SB 1210
                                                                Page 
          7

            Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. P�rez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Roger Hern�ndez


          RJG:k  8/22/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****