BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair


          SB 1251 (Evans) - Ocean Protection Council: Aquatic Invasive 
          Species Working Group.
          
          Amended: May 1, 2012            Policy Vote: NR&W 7-2
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: May 24, 2012      Consultant: Marie Liu
          
          SUSPENSE FILE.  AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.

          
          Bill Summary: SB 1251 would require the Ocean Protection Council 
          (OPC) and the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) to jointly 
          establish the Aquatic Invasive Species Working Group, which will 
          be responsible for developing a well-funded, comprehensive, 
          statewide approach to the management and control of aquatic 
          invasive species by January 1, 2014.

          Fiscal Impact: 
              Ongoing costs of approximately $70,000 from the General 
              Fund (or possibly the California Environmental License Plate 
              Fund) beginning in 2013-14 for facilitating and staffing the 
              working group.
              One-time cost pressures of approximately $20,000 from bond 
              funds (General Fund) in 2013-14 for a grant to cover working 
              group members' travel and expenses.

          Background: Aquatic invasive species (AIS) are currently managed 
          by a myriad of state agencies under multiple statutes and 
          regulations. A report from the California Research Bureau titled 
          "Managing Coastal Aquatic Invasive Species in California" found 
          that the management of coastal AIS includes seven state laws 
          encompassing 230 code sections and 50 sections in the California 
          Code of Regulations.

          There also have been multiple efforts to create a statewide 
          coordinated approach to the prevention and control of AIS, 
          including the development of the California Aquatic Invasive 
          Species Management Plan in 2008 by the Department of Fish and 
          Game in conjunction with many other state agencies. This plan 
          included a recommendation to establish the California Agencies 
          Aquatic Invasive Species Team (CAAIST) which consists of the AIS 
          mangers of each of the member state agencies. In 2009, several 








          SB 1251 (Evans)
          Page 1


          state agencies created the Invasive Species Council of 
          California to focus on interagency coordination. One of the 
          recommendations of this council is to establish an interagency 
          and private sector working group. The council itself has an 
          advisory committee of 24 stakeholder members which has 
          identified 1700 species (terrestrial and aquatic) for which 
          various strategies could apply including exclusion, detection, 
          eradication, control, or management action by the state.

          Proposed Law: This bill would require the OPC and WCB to jointly 
          establish the Aquatic Invasive Species Working group which 
          consists of a total of 29 members selected by the Secretary of 
          the Natural Resources Agency representing perspectives including 
          agricultural commissioners, the aquarium trade, aquaculture, 
          water marinas, commercial shipping interests, recreational 
          boating, counties, public water agencies, and commercial and 
          sport fishing interests. The working group, by January 1, 2014, 
          shall develop a comprehensive, statewide approach to the 
          management and control of AIS that facilities collaboration and 
          coordination among state departments, local governments, and 
          various stakeholders. The working group would be required to 
          recommend actions and priorities intended to control AIS, 
          recommend legislation, recommend top AIS threats, recommend 
          funding sources, and increase agency cooperation. The working 
          group would be required to collaborate with the CAAIST and a 
          science panel of three to six members and to have at least one 
          public hearing per year. A report including some of the working 
          group's recommendations would be required to be submitted to the 
          Legislature by January 1, 2014. 

          This bill would allow the OPC to provide a grant to the working 
          group to cover travel and related expenses. 

          Staff Comments: The direct and indirect economic impacts of AIS 
          are significant. Millions of dollars are spent annually in 
          response to individual species including water hyacinth, 
          Caulerpa taxifolia, and quagga mussels, just to name a few. AIS 
          can affect water distribution systems, industrial cooling 
          systems, boat maintenance, marina facilities, navigational 
          equipment, and threats to commercial and recreational fishing. 
          Additionally, AIS can impact biodiversity, food webs, water 
          quality, and recreational values. 

          While there have been numerous councils/working groups/teams 








          SB 1251 (Evans)
          Page 2


          formed regarding invasive species (aquatic, terrestrial, or 
          both), it seems that the resulting recommendations always 
          include the creation of another council/working group/team. That 
          said, such a recommendation seems reasonable given that 
          California's statutory and regulatory response to invasive 
          species remains convoluted.  

          This bill creates a working group that comprised of non-state 
          stakeholders dealing with AIS, whose participation is needed in 
          conjunction with any state efforts to be successful. That said, 
          staff notes that this working group is quite large, which may 
          ultimately improve the comprehensiveness of its work product, 
          but it may also increase the time and effort needed to reach 
          conclusions and recommendations. For example, the report to the 
          Legislature due on January 1, 2014, must contain recommendations 
          for future legislation. Developing these recommendations alone 
          will most certainly require multiple meetings of the group. The 
          Natural Resources Agency, as chair of the working group will 
          incur costs associated with, staffing, advising, and directing 
          the group for a likely ongoing cost of approximately $70,000.

          This bill does not provide a funding source for the group, but 
          does allow the OPC to provide a grant to cover travel and 
          related expenses. This provision imposes a cost pressure on the 
          OPC of approximately $20,000. Staff notes that the OPC is 
          largely funded by bond dollars, which generally should be spent 
          on capital projects with an expected life of at least 30 years 
          (the life of the bond), not operational costs.


          Proposed Author Amendments: Reduce the number of members to 19, 
          require that the council request funding from the OPC and the 
          WCB, specify that a travel cost grant may not be offered for 
          more than one year, and add a sunset date of January 1, 2015.