BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 1377
                                                                  Page  1

          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1377 (Corbett)
          As Amended  August 20, 2012
          Majority vote.

           SENATE VOTE  :37-0  
          
           JUDICIARY           10-0        HUMAN SERVICES      6-0         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Feuer, Wagner, Atkins,    |Ayes:|Beall, Jones, Ammiano,    |
          |     |Dickinson, Gorell, Huber, |     |Grove, Hall, Portantino   |
          |     |Jones, Monning,           |     |                          |
          |     |Wieckowski, Chesbro       |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      17-0                                        
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey,          |     |                          |
          |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |     |                          |
          |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |     |                          |
          |     |Davis, Donnelly, Gatto,   |     |                          |
          |     |Hall, Hill, Lara,         |     |                          |
          |     |Mitchell, Nielsen, Norby, |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio, Wagner           |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Clarifies the role of and information available to the 
          state-designated protection and advocacy (P&A) agency.  
          Specifically,  this bill :

          1)Provides that the authority of the P&A agency shall include 
            access to the following unredacted records:  a citation 
            report, licensing report, survey report, plan of correction, 
            or statement of deficiency prepared by a department 
            responsible for issuing a license or certificate to a program, 
            facility, or service serving an individual with a disability, 
            and provides that the information obtained in those records is 
            subject to the confidentiality requirements of the Welfare and 
            Institutions (W&I) Code Section 4903(f).

          2)Adds to the enumerated exceptions of existing law that the 








                                                                  SB 1377
                                                                  Page  2

            information and records otherwise subject to certain 
            confidentiality requirements shall also be disclosed to the 
            P&A agency to the extent that the information is contained in 
            an unredacted version of any of the following: an unredacted 
            facility evaluation report form, an unredacted Department of 
            Social Services (DSS) complaint report form, a citation 
            report, licensing report, survey report, plan of correction, 
            or statement of deficiency prepared by an authorized licensing 
            personnel or authorized representatives described, as 
            specified.

          3)Deletes obsolete and inapplicable references.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, costs associated with this legislation should be 
          minor and absorbable within existing resources. 

           COMMENTS  :   

           Background regarding role of P&A agencies  :  The Protection and 
          Advocacy System comprises the nationwide network of 
          congressionally mandated, legally based disability rights 
          agencies.  A P&A agency exists in every U.S. state and 
          territory.  In 1978, Protection & Advocacy, Inc. (since renamed 
          Disability Rights California (DRC)) was designated as 
          California's P&A agency.  Initially, the P&As served people with 
          developmental disabilities, pursuant to the federal 
          Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act 
          (PADD Act).  Since then, the P&As' federal mandates have 
          expanded to include other people with disabilities, including 
          psychiatric, physical, sensory, and learning disabilities.

          The required authority of P&A agencies is set forth in various 
          federal statutes and regulations pertaining to the respective 
          disability populations served by the P&As and the various 
          programs under which they operate.  In 1991, the California 
          Legislature enacted SB 1088 (McCorquodale), Chapter 534, 
          Statutes of 1991, which added Division 4.7 to the W&I Code, and 
          amended other, related provisions, setting out the authority of 
          the state's P&A agency in accord with federal law.  These 
          statutes were amended in 2003 to conform to changes to federal 
          laws and regulations governing P&A agencies, including 
          amendments that expanded the availability of P&A services to 
          persons with all disabilities as defined in the federal 
          Americans with Disabilities Act and the state Fair Employment 








                                                                  SB 1377
                                                                  Page  3

          and Housing Act.  (SB 577 (Kuehl), Chapter 878, Statutes of 
          2003.)   

          Under federal law, the P&A agencies must have authority to 
          investigate incidents of abuse or neglect of people with 
          disabilities; pursue administrative, legal, and other remedies 
          and approaches on behalf of people with disabilities; provide 
          information and training on the legal and service rights of 
          people with disabilities; have access to facilities, programs, 
          services, and the individuals with disabilities receiving such 
          services in those facilities and programs; and, have access to 
          records pertaining to people with disabilities under specified 
          conditions.  All P&As maintain a presence in facilities that 
          care for people with disabilities, where they monitor, 
          investigate and attempt to remedy adverse conditions.  These 
          agencies also devote considerable resources to ensuring full 
          access to inclusive educational programs, financial 
          entitlements, healthcare, accessible housing and productive 
          employment opportunities.  State law likewise specifies that, in 
          order to fulfill its investigatory authority, the P&A agency 
          shall have access to relevant records, as specified.  See, e.g., 
          W&I Code Sections 4902(a)(1), 4903(b).  

           Need for this bill  :  According to the author, "SB 1377 would 
          clarify a protection and advocacy agency's right to review 
          reports of abuse and neglect of individuals with development and 
          mental health disabilities without having to make a separate 
          assertion of probable cause in each case."  The author further 
          explains the need for such clarification as follows: 

            Federally mandated protection and advocacy agencies such as 
            �DRC] are charged with protecting and advocating for the 
            rights of persons with disabilities. In order to fulfill this 
            function, federal law grants �P&A] agencies the right to 
            access reports prepared by state agencies that investigate 
            reports of abuse, neglect, injury or death of persons with 
            disabilities and perform certification or licensing reviews.  

            In the past, the Department of Public Health (DPH) provided 
            such reports to DRC in complete and unredacted form.  However, 
            in 2009 the DPH changed this policy for two special 
            populations of vulnerable individuals with disabilities-people 
            with developmental disabilities and people with mental health 
            disabilities.  Citing state privacy laws governing the records 
            of persons with developmental disabilities (W&I Code Section 








                                                                  SB 1377
                                                                  Page  4

            4514) and mental health disabilities (W&I Code Section 5328), 
            DPH began forwarding to DRC redacted records with all relevant 
            information about cases involving individuals with either a 
            developmental disability or mental health disability blacked 
            out.  Under DPH's policy, DRC upon receipt of the redacted 
            report must then submit an individual written request to 
            receive an unredacted record for the case.  For cases 
            involving people with all other disabilities, DRC continued to 
            receive reports from DPH in the usual unredacted form.  

          This extra step is unnecessary and unwarranted, supporters 
          state.  California law (W&I Code Section 4903) already requires 
          the P&A agencies to maintain the confidentiality of this 
          information and the right to P&As to access this information is 
          not in dispute.  Requiring this extra layer of bureaucratic 
          process creates a significant time lag that often extends months 
          before DRC receives the unredacted report.  In some cases the 
          wait has been almost a year.  This delay can jeopardize the 
          well-being of the individuals involved.  In addition, the 
          requirement creates more administrative work and unnecessary 
          costs for the state.

          This bill, sponsored by DRC, would specify that certain records, 
          including citation reports, licensing reports, survey reports, 
          plans of correction, and statements of deficiencies prepared, as 
          specified, shall be provided in unredacted form.  With respect 
          to persons with developmental disabilities or mental health 
          disabilities, specifically, where existing law would prohibit 
          the disclosure of certain confidential information or records 
          subject only to limited statutory exceptions, this bill would 
          add to those enumerated exceptions that such information and 
          records shall also be disclosed to the P&A agency to the extent 
          that the information is contained in an unredacted citation 
          report, unredacted licensing report, unredacted survey report, 
          unredacted plan of correction, or unredacted statement of 
          deficiency prepared by an authorized licensing personnel or 
          authorized representatives described, as specified.  This bill 
          would also specify that information obtained in those records 
          must be kept confidential by the P&A agency pursuant to existing 
          law.    

           Timely access to reports is integral to the intended functions 
          of P&A agencies.   Existing law provides for numerous types of 
          reports that the P&A agency shall have access to under W&I Code 
          Section 4903.  This bill would require that the P&A agency have 








                                                                  SB 1377
                                                                  Page  5

          access to the unredacted versions of the following records:  
          citation reports, licensing reports, survey reports, plans of 
          correction, and statements of deficiency prepared by a 
          department responsible for issuing a licensee or certificate to 
          a program, facility, or service serving an individual with a 
          disability.   

          As explained by the sponsor of this bill, California's P&A 
          agency, DRC:  "Federally mandated P&A's, such as �DRC] are 
          charged with protecting and advocating for the rights of persons 
          with disabilities.  In order to fulfill this function, federal 
          law grants P&A's the right to access reports prepared by state 
          agencies that investigate reports of abuse, neglect with 
          disabilities and perform certification or licensing reviews."  
          And yet, DRC and the author of this bill comment that in recent 
          years a DPH policy has created delay in DRC's timely access to 
          unredacted citation reports, licensing reports, survey reports, 
          plans of correction, and statements of deficiencies prepared by 
          the department.  Only after the P&A agency receives a redacted 
          version and submits a specific written request will the DPH 
          provide the unredacted version.  On average, DRC reports, it 
          takes 32 days to get reports back from the date of request to 
          date received.  Three reports took 305 days to reach DRC, while 
          another two took 215 days.  Those wait times have reportedly 
          shortened since the DRC began working with DPH to develop a 
          standard request form.  The last 10 records requested took an 
          average of 24 days, and five of these took 45 days. 

          By specifying that these specific types of records, in 
          unredacted form, are to be provided to the agency in statute, it 
          is hoped that this bill will eliminate this relatively recent 
          practice that has resulted in substantial delays of records, 
          which are vital to the P&A agency's ability to perform its 
          investigatory duty.  

          Existing law arguably gives the P&A agency the right to access 
          these reports (W&I Code Sections 4902(a), 4903(a)-(b)).  To the 
          extent that the P&A agency's access to full reports is 
          obstructed by redacting information and only providing the full, 
          unredacted version upon specific written request, the addition 
          of these types of unredacted records to the existing list of 
          records in Section 4903 would add useful clarity and expedite 
          the process in the interest of these persons with disabilities 
          who are affected by delays in access to records.  









                                                                  SB 1377
                                                                  Page  6

          Federal case law also cautions against the imposition of 
          restrictions on P&A access that would impair the P&A agency's 
          ability to conduct timely investigations.  In Iowa Protection 
          and Advocacy Services, Inc. v. Rasmussen, 206 F.R.D. 630, 2001 
          WL 1809404 (S.D. Iowa 2002), for example, the court held that 
          Congress, in enacting the Protection and Advocacy for 
          Individuals with Mental Illness (PAIMI) and PADD Acts, "occupied 
          the field" with respect to rules concerning disclosure of 
          investigatory information.  "Protection and advocacy systems are 
          established as independent checks on state care and regulation 
          of care of dependent adults.  That independent check would 
          become meaningless if a state was allowed to simply legislate 
          away a protection and advocacy system's power to investigate by 
          enacting restrictions." Id. at 639.

          With respect to persons with developmental disabilities or 
          mental health disabilities, this bill would specify that 
          permissible disclosures of confidential information or records 
          shall also include disclosure to the P&A agency to the extent 
          that the information is contained in specified unredacted 
          records.  This bill would provide that the confidentiality of 
          any information obtained in those reports must be maintained by 
          the P&A agency as specified under existing law.  


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chris Reefe / HUM. S. / (916) 319-2089 


                                                                FN: 0005081