BILL ANALYSIS �
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
SB 1378 (Hancock) - Emergency medical services personnel.
Amended: May 1, 2012 Policy Vote: Health 9-0
Urgency: No Mandate: Yes
Hearing Date: May 24, 2012 Consultant: Brendan McCarthy
SUSPENSE FILE.
Bill Summary: SB 1378 would require the medical director of a
local emergency medical services agency to evaluate the good
character and rehabilitation of an emergency medical technician
who has a prior conviction before denying certification.
Fiscal Impact:
One-time costs up to $55,000 (General Fund or Emergency
Medical Technician Certification Fund) to revise existing
regulations.
Unknown costs from local mandate claims (General Fund).
Background: Under existing law, local emergency medical services
agencies are responsible for certifying emergency medical
technicians (class I and II). Existing law and regulation
authorizes local emergency medical services agencies to deny,
suspend, or revoke certificates for specified activities,
including prior criminal convictions.
Proposed Law: SB 1378 would require the medical director of a
local emergency services agency to evaluate the good character
and rehabilitation of an applicant for a certificate who has a
prior criminal conviction before determining whether to issue
the certificate. The bill specifies several criteria to be
evaluated by the medical director. The bill also requires the
medical director to only consider convictions for which the
applicant was prosecuted as an adult when considering whether to
deny a certificate.
Related Legislation:
AB 2917 (Torrico) Chapter 274 of 2007 required the state
Emergency Medical Services Agency to develop standards and
guidelines for certification of emergency medical
SB 1378 (Hancock)
Page 1
technicians.
AB 1944 (Gatto) would revise the process for disciplining
emergency medical technician - paramedics (who are certified
at the state level). That bill is on the Assembly
Appropriations Committee's suspense file.
Staff Comments: This bill essentially codifies existing
regulations and practice. The current regulations governing the
certification process require medical directors to consider the
rehabilitation of an applicant with a prior conviction. In
addition, the regulations generally require medical officers to
only consider adult convictions when considering whether to deny
a certificate.
However, because the provisions of this bill do not exactly
conform to existing regulations, the state Emergency Medical
Services Authority will likely have to revise the existing
regulations to conform to this bill.
The bill requires costs that local agencies may incur under the
bill to be reimbursed by the state. While the bill codifies
existing regulations, putting these requirements explicitly in
statute may make some costs reimbursable by the state.