BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �





           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO: sb 1396
          SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN              AUTHOR:  Dutton
                                                         VERSION: 4/11/12
          Analysis by:  Carrie Cornwell                  FISCAL:  yes
          Hearing date:  May 8, 2012                         URGENCY:  YES



          SUBJECT:

          Gasoline and diesel fuel taxes

          DESCRIPTION:

          This bill lowers taxes on gasoline and diesel by exempting from 
          sales tax the amount charged for gasoline in excess of $3.88 per 
          gallon and for diesel in excess of $3.52 per gallon, capping 
          gasoline and diesel excise taxes, and allowing these excise 
          taxes to adjust down but not up under the cap.

          ANALYSIS:

          The state imposes a sales tax of 7.25 percent on taxable goods, 
          of which the state portion is 5 percent and the local portion is 
          2.25 percent.  In addition, local jurisdictions impose their own 
          optional, voter-approved sales taxes, which vary from 
          jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but on average equal 0.86 percent.

          State gasoline taxes

          Existing law imposes an 18-cent per gallon excise tax on each 
          gallon of gasoline sold in the state of California.  State law, 
          known as the "gas tax swap," imposes an additional excise tax on 
          gasoline that the Board of Equalization (BOE) adjusts annually 
          to equal the amount of sales tax that the state would charge on 
          gasoline sales if they were subject to the state portion of the 
          sales tax.  Currently, the total excise tax paid on a gallon of 
          gasoline is 35.7 cents per gallon, and on July1 of this year it 
          will be 36 cents.

          State diesel taxes

          Similarly, for diesel fuel California historically imposed both 
          sales tax and an 18-cent per gallon excise tax on each gallon of 
          diesel sold in the state.  The gas tax swap legislation reduced 
          this excise tax to 13 cents per gallon and imposed an additional 





          SB 1396 (DUTTON)
                                                                 Page 2
                                                                       

          1.75 percent sales tax beginning on July 1, 2010, and then 
          varies this additional sales tax on diesel as follows:

                 1.87 percent for the 2011-12 fiscal year; 
                 2.17 percent for the 2012-13 fiscal year; 
                 1.94 percent for the 2013-14 fiscal year.

          The gas tax swap requires BOE to adjust the diesel excise tax 
          annually to ensure that the total amount of tax collected does 
          not vary from what it would have been if the 18-cent excise tax 
          and the sales tax rate had been left in place.
           This bill  : 

           Excludes, for purposes of the sales tax, amounts over $3.88 
            per gallon for retail sales of gasoline, including federal and 
            state excise taxes.  (This price with local sales tax equates 
            to about $4 per gallon.)

           Excludes, for purposes of the sales tax, amounts over $3.52 
            per gallon for retail sales of diesel, including federal 
            excise tax but excluding the state gasoline excise tax.  (This 
            price with the sales tax and state excise tax equates to about 
            $4 per gallon.)

           Caps the excise tax on gasoline so it can never exceed the 
            current 35.7 cents per gallon.

           Directs, BOE within the gas tax swap provisions, to adjust the 
            amount of state excise tax charged per gallon on gasoline to 
            reflect price drops that would have lowered the sales tax, but 
            not price increases that would have raised the sales tax.

           Caps the excise tax on diesel at 13 cents per gallon.

           Directs BOE, within the gas tax swap provisions, to decrease 
            the amount of excise tax charged per gallon on diesel to 
            reflect increased revenues from the additional sales tax 
            resulting from price increases, but not to adjust the excise 
            tax up when lower prices result in decreased revenues.

           Is an urgency measure.
          
          COMMENTS:

           1.Purpose  .  The author notes that California consumers are 
            paying an average of $4.38 per gallon of regular unleaded 





          SB 1396 (DUTTON)
                                                                 Page 3
                                                                       

            fuel, the highest in the continental United States.  He 
            asserts that because of the way that taxes are calculated on 
            fuel, state coffers see a windfall of cash as gas prices rise 
            and Californians struggle to fill their gas tanks.  For 
            example, in the second quarter of 2011, he states that the 
            state collected an additional $61 million in fuel tax revenue 
            despite the fact that fuel consumption fell by 127 million 
            gallons.  By capping fuel taxes as this bill proposes, it will 
            save taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars; money that can 
            be put towards food for their families, sending their children 
            to college, or saving for retirement.  Additionally, he 
            introduced this bill to help create jobs in California, 
            because nearly every industry in the state uses fuel for 
            producing or transporting goods.  With decreased taxes on 
            fuel, companies will have additional cash flow which could be 
            used for a variety of purposes.

           2.Lower taxes, lower prices  ?  Decreasing the taxes a seller of a 
            good pays on that good does not necessarily result in a 
            decreased retail price to consumers.  This is particularly 
            true for gasoline and diesel for which worldwide demand and 
            the world price of crude oil are the most significant 
            influences on the price.  That is why, despite persistent 
            decreases in demand in California, the price of gasoline has 
            increased significantly in recent years.  It is unlikely, 
            therefore, that this bill would result in price decreases, and 
            in any case, the bill makes no requirement on sellers that 
            they pass its tax savings through to consumers.
           
          3.Revenue neutrality  .  Legislators crafted the gas tax swap of 
            2010 to remove transportation from the state's General Fund 
            and thus to ensure stable state-level revenue streams for 
            transportation.  To achieve these ends, the gas tax swap 
            eliminated the state sales tax on gasoline and replaced it 
            with an increase in the gasoline excise tax designed to 
            generate an equivalent amount of revenue.  To ensure 
            continuing revenue neutrality in the swap, each year the Board 
            of Equalization must adjust the gasoline excise tax such that 
            over time the new excise tax generates the same revenue as the 
            old sales tax on gasoline would have generated.
          
            By eliminating the sales tax on gasoline, the gas tax swap 
            decreased the amount of revenue dedicated to transit.  To 
            partially make up for this loss in transit funding, the gas 
            tax swap legislation also provided for a revenue-neutral swap 
            of (increased) sales tax on diesel and (reduced) diesel excise 





          SB 1396 (DUTTON)
                                                                 Page 4
                                                                       

            tax. 

            This bill undoes major portions of the 2010 gas tax swap, and 
            thus would decrease transportation revenues beginning on July 
            1, when it would stop the BOE from adjusting the gasoline 
            excise tax rate from 35.7 cents per gallon to 36 cents per 
            gallon.  The bill would also limit BOE's ability to adjust the 
            excise tax rates over coming years to "true up" transportation 
            revenues to reflect how much revenue would have resulted if 
            the swap had never occurred.  Over time, as the price of 
            gasoline increases, the 35.7-cent cap that this bill imposes 
            would ratchet transportation revenues down, limiting funds 
            available to state and local governments for street and road 
            maintenance and improvements.
          
           4.2012-13 transportation funding loss  .  BOE staff estimates that 
            the revenue loss from the gasoline tax provisions of this bill 
            would be $439 million in fiscal year 2012-13.  The vast 
            majority of this $439 million would be 
            constitutionally-protected dedicated transportation revenues.  
            Of this $439 million, $91 million would be lower local sales 
            tax revenues, some of which would be from voter-enacted 
            transportation sales tax measures, and $348 million would be 
            in state excise tax revenues.  Article XIX of the California 
            Constitution dedicates excise tax revenues to the research, 
            planning, construction, improvement, maintenance, and 
            operation of public streets and highways and mass transit 
            guideways. 

            BOE estimates that the revenue loss from the diesel tax 
            provisions, which limit the sales tax on diesel, of this bill 
            would be $107 million in fiscal year 2012-13, $75 million of 
            which would come from state funding for transit.

           5.Double-referral  . The Rules Committee referred this bill to 
            both the Transportation and Housing Committee and to the 
            Governance and Finance Committee.  Therefore, if this bill 
            passes this committee, it will be referred to the Committee on 
            Governance and Finance.
           
           POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the committee before noon on 
          Wednesday, May 2, 2012)

               SUPPORT:  Hon. George Runner, Member, State Board of 
          Equalization (sponsor)
                         Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association





          SB 1396 (DUTTON)
                                                                 Page 5
                                                                       

          
               OPPOSED:  Associated General Contractors
                         California State Association of Counties
                         League of California Cities
                         Transportation California
                         United Contractors