BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 1407
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 16, 2012
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
SB 1407 (Leno) - As Amended: June 20, 2012
Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:10
- 0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill prohibits a psychotherapist from releasing a child's
mental health records or information based on an authorization
signed by a parent or guardian from whom the child has been
removed in a dependency proceeding, unless a court finds that
such a release would not be detrimental to the child and orders
the disclosure.
FISCAL EFFECT
There are no significant costs associated with this legislation.
COMMENTS
Purpose . This bill provides that a therapist may only release
the mental health information of a dependent child to a parent
without physical custody of the child if there has been a court
order to release the information.
The author notes that California law allows parents whose
children have been removed from their care because of abuse,
abandonment, or neglect to access their children's mental health
information, subject to some discretion by the therapist. A
parent who has lost physical custody of a child as a result of a
court order may not be acting in their child's best interest
when authorizing use of the child's mental health treatment
information, and may use this confidential information to
further his or her own legal purposes, undermining the child's
stated wishes or best interests. The author argues that
treatment of a child who has experienced abuse or neglect
requires building a sense of trust, autonomy and personal
SB 1407
Page 2
boundaries. Children who lose trust in the confidentiality of
their communications may be unwilling to trust future
therapists, social workers or counselors.
Supporters argue that this bill protects the privacy rights of
children who are removed from their parents' care due to abuse
or neglect and protects against harm caused by the inappropriate
use of sensitive mental health information, unless a court
orders otherwise. The bill ensures that these children's best
interests are taken into consideration before sensitive mental
health records are released. The bill, supporters argue,
strikes the appropriate balance between parental autonomy and
the privacy and treatment needs of foster children.
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081