BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                               SB 1427
                                                                       

                       SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
                         Senator S. Joseph Simitian, Chairman
                               2011-2012 Regular Session
                                            
           BILL NO:    SB 1427
           AUTHOR:     de León
           AMENDED:    April 17, 2012
           FISCAL:     Yes               HEARING DATE:   April 23, 2012
           URGENCY:    No                CONSULTANT:      Rebecca Newhouse
            
           SUBJECT  :    BID PREFERENCES:  REFURBISHED ELECTRONICS

            SUMMARY  :    
           
            Existing law  :

           1) Under the Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003 (Public 
              Resources Code §42460 et seq.):

              a)    Defines the following terms (§42463):

                 i)         "Refurbished," when describing a covered 
                      electronic device (CED), means a device that the 
                      manufacturer has tested and returned to a condition 
                      that meets factory specifications for the device, has 
                      repackaged and has labeled as refurbished.

                 ii)        "Covered electronic device" means a video 
                      display device containing a screen greater than four 
                      inches, measured diagonally, excluding certain 
                      specified electronic devices with video displays of 
                      the requisite length.

              b)    Requires a consumer to pay a Covered Electronic Waste 
                 (CEW) recycling fee upon the purchase of a new or 
                 refurbished CED and requires all fees collected pursuant 
                 to the Act to be deposited in the Electronic Waste and 
                 Recovery and Recycling Account, and authorizes those 
                 monies to be appropriated for specified purposes (§42464).

              c)    Requires the Department of Resources Recycling and 
                 Recovery (DRRR) to review payment claims made by CEW 
                 collectors and recyclers and determine if a payment is due 









                                                               SB 1427
                                                                 Page 2

                 under the Act.  DRRR may deny or adjust payment for an 
                 incomplete or deficient payment claim. 

              d)    Requires a person who exports CEW to a foreign country 
                 follow specific guidelines and reporting requirements.

              e)    Prohibits manufacturers from selling new or refurbished 
                 CEW unless the device is labeled with the name of the 
                 manufacturer or the manufacturer's brand label, so that it 
                 is readily visible.

              f)    Requires manufacturers of a CEW to submit a report to 
                 DRRR which includes an estimate of the number of covered 
                 electronic devices sold in the previous year, total 
                 estimated amount of recyclable materials used in the 
                 manufacturer of CEW, total estimated amounts of mercury, 
                 cadmium, lead, hexavalent chromium, and PBB's used in 
                 covered electronic devices manufactured in that year, 
                 efforts to design covered electronic devices for recycling 
                 and plans for further increasing design for recycling.

              g)    Requires manufacturers to make information available to 
                 consumers that describes where and how to return, recycle, 
                 and dispose of the CED and opportunities and locations for 
                 the collection or return of the device. 

              h)    Requires a manufacturer of a CED to provide a notice to 
                 the retailer that identifies the CED and informs the 
                 retailer that the CED is subject to a fee.

           2) Under the Recycled Product Procurement Mandates Pertaining to 
              Local Governments Law (Public Contracts Code §22151):

              a)    Requires local public entities to purchase recycled 
                 products when recycled products are available at the same 
                 or lesser total cost of nonrecycled products, if fitness 
                 and quality are equal. 

              b)    Authorizes local public entities to give a preference 
                 to suppliers of recycled products and specify the amount 
                 of the preference.











                                                               SB 1427
                                                                 Page 3



            This bill  :  

           1) Requires a state agency, when accepting bids or proposals for 
              a contract for electronic goods, give a preference to a 
              business that offers to fulfill a contract with refurbished 
              electronics.  Specifically, for contracts awarded to the 
              lowest responsible bidder meeting specifications, the 
              preference will be five percent of the bid price. For 
              contracts awarded to the highest scored bidder based on 
              evaluation factors in addition to price, the preference will 
              be five percent of the total score of the highest responsible 
              bidder. 

           2) Prohibits the above preference from being awarded to a 
              noncompliant bidder and from being used to satisfy any 
              applicable minimum requirements.

           3) Requires that a business, in order to be eligible for the 
              preference, submit all necessary substantiating documentation 
              and information required by the state agency to determine if 
              they are eligible for the preference.

           4) Requires the Department of General Services to establish a 
              process to verify that a business meets the criteria for the 
              preference.

           5) Prohibits the refurbished electronics preference from being 
              construed to require a state agency to compromise its 
              immediate mission or ability to function and carry out 
              existing responsibilities. 

            COMMENTS  :

            1) Purpose of Bill  .  According to the author, "SB 1427 will 
              require state agencies that accept bids or proposals for 
              electronic goods contracts to provide a preference of five 
              percent to a company that offers to fulfill the contract with 
              refurbished electronics.  The goal of SB 1427 is to increase 
              the state's use of refurbished electronics to help our local 
              economies by increasing the demand for electronics recycling, 
              reduce the amount of toxins in our environment and lessen the 









                                                               SB 1427
                                                                 Page 4

              demand for newly-mined conflict minerals which fuels violence 
              against women."

            2) Background  . Electronic waste (e-waste) refers to any unwanted 
              electronic device or cathode ray tube (CRT) and is an 
              ever-growing global problem; as technology continues to 
              become more affordable and widely adopted, the incredible 
              speed of development of more advanced technologies ensures 
              that previous electronic designs and models quickly become 
              obsolete.  A 2012 Pike Research report estimates that the 
              total volume of e-waste will grow from 6 million tons (the 
              2010 figure), to 14.9 million tons by 2025.

              According to CalRecycle, e-waste makes up 0.5 percent of the 
              total waste stream in California, which equates to over 
              200,000 tons that ends up in landfills.  It is currently 
              illegal to dispose of CRTs and many electronic devices with 
              ordinary wastes due to the fact they contain toxic materials, 
              such as mercury and lead, which can leach into the 
              environment when improperly discarded.

              The increasing demand for electronics has social as well as 
              environmental implications; newly-mined minerals including 
              columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, wolframite, and 
              gold, and used to manufacture many electronic devices has 
              fueled slave labor, mass rape and other atrocities in the 
              Democratic Republic of Congo, giving rise to the term 
              "conflict-minerals." 

              Policies encouraging or requiring the recycling and reuse of 
              e-waste, as well as laws requiring manufacturers to take 
              responsibility for end-of-life electronics (generally 
              referred to as extended producer responsibility or product 
              stewardship), are making significant progress in reducing the 
              impacts of end-of-life electronics.  In California, the 
              Hazardous Electronic Recycling Act (Act) of 2003 requires 
              that consumers pay a fee for covered electronic devices (see 
              comment #3 below), which is used to collect and recycle those 
              devices.  In June of 2011, the LA Times reported that the 
              state's electronic waste recycling program collected its 1 
              billionth pound of unwanted electronics.  The Act also 
              includes requirements for the exportation of covered 
              electronic devices for recycling or disposal, although there 









                                                               SB 1427
                                                                 Page 5

              is controversy over improper and unsafe recycling and 
              disposal practices in countries like China and India.

            3) Covered vs. non-covered electronic waste  .  Covered electronic 
              wastes are electronic devices that have a diagonal screen 
              length greater than four inches and include CRT containing 
              devices, such as televisions and computer monitors, laptop 
              computers and desktop monitors with liquid crystal displays 
              (LCD), certain mobile phones, electronic tablets and other 
              electronic devices.  Although the Act has increased recycling 
              and reuse efforts for these electronics, there are many 
              electronic goods that are not covered by the Act, including 
              computer towers, printers, fax machines, stereo equipment, 
              computer peripherals, calculators, microwaves, telephones and 
              many others.  This bill currently applies to CED and non CED, 
              but the definition of refurbished, when applied to 
              electronics, only refers to covered electronic devices. The 
              committee may wish to suggest that the definition of 
              "refurbished" be amended to include non-covered electronics 
              as well.

            4) What are the effects of increased use of refurbished 
              electronics  ?  For California, increasing the use of 
              refurbished electronics would ultimately mean that fewer 
              electronic devices end up in landfills or exported overseas.  
              On a global scale, using refurbished electronics ultimately 
              reduces the need to mine and process new materials, including 
              conflict minerals, for electronic devices which in turn helps 
              conserve natural resources, avoid air and water pollution and 
              reduce greenhouse gas emissions.  Some governments have 
              already taken action to address the use of conflict minerals 
              in new electronic devices.  Both California, with the 
              California Supply Chain Transparency Act, passed in 2010, and 
              the federal government, as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street 
              Reform and Consumer Protection Act, are requiring new 
              reporting requirements and supply chain transparency for 
              companies that use conflict minerals for product 
              manufacturing.  In California, SB 861 (Corbett) Chapter 715, 
              Statutes of 2011, prohibits companies that fail to comply 
              with the Dodd-Frank Act regarding conflict mineral reporting, 
              from bidding on California state contracts for goods or 
              services.










                                                               SB 1427
                                                                 Page 6

            5) What is the effect of a five percent preference  ?  By granting 
              a preference for businesses that fulfill electronic goods 
              contracts with refurbished electronics, the bill seeks to 
              improve the large scale competitiveness of refurbished goods, 
              which are typically less expensive on the individual scale, 
              but may be more expensive in bulk than new electronics.  It 
              is unclear how many, if any, businesses are bidding for state 
              agency electronic goods contracts that supply refurbished 
              electronics.  If there are businesses bidding for state 
              agency electronic goods contracts with refurbished 
              electronics, it is unclear whether a five percent preference 
              would currently help those businesses compete in a 
              significant way with companies supplying new electronics. 

              Even so, providing preferences for refurbished goods for 
              state contracts may encourage businesses and manufacturers to 
              develop the necessary infrastructure to refurbish their 
              electronic devices on the bulk scale.  As manufacturing 
              processes are streamlined, costs will come down, and in the 
              future, it is feasible that a five percent preference could 
              make a substantial difference in determining whether 
              businesses supplying refurbished electronics are granted 
              state contracts.  Also, lower costs would mean better 
              penetration of refurbished electronics into the private 
              sector, which could have a much more significant effect in 
              the long term on mitigating environmental and social impacts 
              of end-of-life electronics. 

            6) Related Legislation  .  The following legislation relates to 
              electronic device reuse and recycling, or conflict minerals:
               
              a)    SB 657 (Steinberg) Chapter 556, Statutes of 2010, 
                 requires retail sellers and manufacturers doing business 
                 in the state and with more than $1 million in annual 
                 worldwide gross receipts, to disclose their efforts to 
                 eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their direct 
                 supply chains for tangible goods offered for sale.

              b)    SB 861 (Corbett) Chapter 715, Statutes of 2011, prohibits 
                 a scrutinized company, as defined, that uses conflict 
                 minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, from 
                 bidding on a state contract for goods or            
                 services. 









                                                               SB 1427
                                                                 Page 7


              c)    AB 549 (Carter) of 2011 seeks to require, as a 
                 condition of making e-waste recycling or recovery payments 
                 by DRRR, that the covered electronic device for which the 
                 payment is claimed was used in California.  AB 549 is 
                 currently in the Environmental Quality Committee. 

              d)    AB 583 (Knight) of 2011 would transfer the duties, 
                 powers, and authority of the DTSC under the Electronic 
                 Waste Recycling Act to DRRR.  A hearing in the Assembly 
                 Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee was 
                 canceled at the author's request.

              e)    AB 960 (Lowenthal) of 2011 requires a person who 
                 exports non-covered electronic waste to a foreign country 
                 to comply with the same requirements imposed on an 
                 exporter of covered electronic waste (CEW) under the 
                 provisions of the Hazardous Electronic Recycling Act. AB 
                 960 is currently on the Senate Appropriations Committee 
                 Suspense file.

            SOURCE  :        Global Green  

           SUPPORT  :       ecoATM, Inc.
                          California National Organization for Women
                          One Individual
           
            OPPOSITION  :    None on file