BILL ANALYSIS �
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
SB 1513 (Negrete McLeod) - State Compensation Insurance Fund:
investments
Amended: April 16, 2012 Policy Vote: Insurance 8-0
Urgency: No Mandate: No
Hearing Date: May 14, 2012 Consultant: Bob Franzoia
This bill may meet the criteria for referral to the Suspense
File.
Bill Summary: SB 1513 would authorize the board of directors of
the State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) to invest or
reinvest, an aggregated maximum of 20 percent of the moneys that
are in excess of the admitted assets over the liabilities and
required reserves, in specified investments.
Fiscal Impact: Increased investment risk
>
Background: A financial review of SCIF, as well as other
insurers, included assessing such aspects of their investment
portfolio as liquidity, diversification and quality. This bill
would have permitted SCIF to expand its investment portfolio in
riskier products without any limitations. While the expansion
would help with diversification, there were significant concerns
with the resulting additional risks. The current version of the
bill reflects efforts to limit this risk to an acceptable level
by providing a 20 percent cap on specified investments.
The 20 percent limit was calculated as follows:
* Total liabilities were deducted from total assets. (SCIF
is required to support all of its policy-related liabilities
with currently authorized investments).
* Deduction for various assets and accounts (real estate,
surplus enhancements for reinsurance, additional capital SCIF
will need to set aside for higher risk investments) that need to
be supported by the surplus.
* Deduction of a 10 percent cushion for market fluctuation of
assets supporting the liabilities.
* Deduction of an additional cushion for operational risk.
SB 1513 (Negrete McLeod)
Page 1
* The remaining balance equated to approximately 20 percent
of surplus.
Proposed Law: State Fund Prohibited Excess Funds Investments
this bill would allow:
(1) Insurance Code 1191 (a North American company's stock).
(2) Insurance Code 1192.4 (10 percent maximum of capital and
surplus in Canadian corporate stock).
(3) Insurance Code 1192.6 (mortgage, mortgage-backed bond,
mortgage participation, pass-through, conventional pass-though,
trust or participation certificate secured with real property or
pool of real property).
(4) Insurance Code 1192.10 (securities with undivided interest
in, right to receive payments from or payable primarily from
distributions on pools of financial assets other than those
permitted by Insurance Code 1192.6, as specified).
(5) Insurance Code 1194.7 (federal home loan bank stock).
(6) Insurance Code 1198 (maximum investment limit on corporate
capital stock of 10 percent of insurer's admitted assets
exceeding liabilities & reserves).
Staff Comments: Existing law authorizes SCIF to invest primarily
in bonds. While this minimizes risk, it can also limit
investment earnings.
By way of comparison, the State Teachers' Retirement System has
similar investments with the exception of Insurance Code 1194.7
(federal home loan bank stock). STRS invests in Insurance Code
1192.4 (Canadian corporate stock) but without a ten percent
limit.
Clearly, the biggest risk is investment in Insurance Code 1191
(North American company stock). Both PERS and STRS have had
losses in this investment.
Recommended Amendments: In order to provide legislative
oversight of the expanded investment options, staff recommends
the bill be amended to require SCIF to report on these
investments in its 2018 annual report. For example,
- Have the new investments reduced the volatility in market
price of the investment portfolio. In other words, when bonds
prices fall (interest rates go up), did the market value of the
SCIF equities increase or fall less than the fixed income
portfolio.
SB 1513 (Negrete McLeod)
Page 2
- Over longer periods of time (3 years, 5 years, and 10 years)
did the equity portfolio outperform the bond portfolio on a
total return basis (income plus appreciation)?
- Have the SCIF investment managers outperformed the S&P 500
index? Have the SCIF investment managers outperformed strategy
specific benchmarks, for example, the Russell 1000 for a
dividend growth strategy.