BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 1525
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 8, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   SB 1525 (Padilla) - As Amended:  August 6, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                              Arts Vote:5-1
                        Higher Education                      6-2

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill enacts a Student Athlete Bill of Rights and places 
          specified requirements on collegiate athletic programs 
          commencing with the 2013-14 academic year and ending January 1, 
          2021,  Specifically, this bill:

          1)Applies all of the following requirements only to a higher 
            education institution receiving income of more than $10 
            million annually through media rights (contracts with 
            television networks), and requires the institution to rely 
            exclusively on this revenue to cover the costs of these 
            requirements.

          2)Requires the postsecondary education institution, if a student 
            athlete's athletic scholarship is not renewed due to 
            incapacitating injury or illness result from participation in 
            the athletic program, to provide an equivalent scholarship, 
            that when combined with the previous athletic scholarship, 
            provides the student with up to five academic years or until 
            the student completes his academic degree, whichever comes 
            first. A student's temporary leave of absence shall not count 
            against the five-year limit.

          3)Requires an athletic program with a six-year graduation 
            success rate, disaggregated by team, of less than 60%, to 
            provide a student athlete in good standing who has exhausted 
            their athletic scholarship with an equivalent scholarship for 
            up to one year.

          4)Requires each athletic program to conduct a financial and life 
            skills workshop, as specified, for all first-year and 








                                                                  SB 1525
                                                                  Page  2

            third-year student athletes.

          5)Requires an athletic program to respond within seven business 
            days to a student athlete's written request to transfer.

          6)Stipulates that an athletic program, unless the student 
            athlete declines, is responsible for paying the health 
            insurance premiums of a student athlete whose household income 
            does not exceed the level of Cal Grant A recipients, for 
            insurance covering claims resulting from the student's 
            participation in the athletic program.

          7)Stipulates that an athletic program is responsible for paying 
            the insurance deductible amount applicable to a student who 
            suffers injury resulting from participation in the athletic 
            program, and if the student requires ongoing medical 
            treatment, the program is to provide, for at least two years 
            after the student's graduation or separate from the 
            institution, either necessary medical treatment or health 
            insurance covering the injury and resulting deductibles.

          8)Requires the athletic program to adopt and implement 
            guidelines to prevent, assess and treat sports-related 
            concussions and dehydration.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Based on their annual revenue from media rights, this bill 
            will initially only apply to four schools-the University of 
            California's (UC's) Berkeley and Los Angeles campuses, 
            Stanford University, and the University of Southern 
            California. There will be no additional costs to UC, as the 
            university indicates the bill's requirements are consistent 
            with current policies and practices.

          2)The California State University (CSU) indicates that its San 
            Diego campus will meet the media revenue threshold for this 
            bill in the near future, and estimates that annual costs for 
            additional scholarships could be up to $500,000, covered by 
            non-state sources.

          3)To the extent former student-athletes, upon losing an athletic 
            scholarship, receive extended scholarships paid for media 
            rights revenues, instead of being entitled to state and 
            institutional aid, there will be minor savings to these 








                                                                  SB 1525
                                                                  Page  3

            programs.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  . According to the author, "Current law only requires 
            that institutions of higher education post information related 
            to athletic financial aid, cost of attendance, the cost of 
            medical expenses, who holds the responsibility to pay for 
            medical expenses and transfer policies.  NCAA regulations 
            provide universities with a significant amount of discretion 
            in how they protect student-athletes.  Universities choose not 
            to renew a scholarship annually from year to year at will.  
            Similarly, university and NCAA medical insurance only kicks in 
            after the student-athlete's insurance is exhausted.  Lastly, 
            there is little governing the due process and transfer rights 
            for student-athletes, allowing universities to give 
            student-athletes fewer rights than the student general body."

           2)Opposition  . While recent amendments have removed the 
            opposition of UC and USC, Stanford opposes the bill being 
            applied only to four institutions based on their level media 
            revenue. Stanford argues that, at a minimum, provisions of the 
            bill that in their view would have little or no cost impact 
            should be applied to all institutions with Division I or II 
            programs.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081