BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair


          SB 1537 (Kehoe) - Energy: rates: net energy metering.
          
          Amended: May 1, 2012            Policy Vote: EU&C 10-1
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: May 14, 2012      Consultant: Marie Liu
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
          
          
          Bill Summary: This bill would prohibit the California Public 
          Utilities Commission (PUC) from adopting any new charges that 
          only apply to customers with a net metering contract until 
          January 1, 2014.

          Fiscal Impact: Likely one-time costs of hundreds of thousands of 
          dollars to the General Fund and special funds to offset the 
          costs of net energy meeting until 2014.

          Background: Existing law requires electric utilities to credit 
          all electricity generated by a customer-owned renewable energy 
          system against the customer's usage of electricity sold by the 
          utility, a procedure known as "net energy metering" (NEM). Under 
          the California Solar Initiative (CSI), customers who install 
          solar system receive "full retail NEM" where the customer is 
          exempt from paying transmission and distribution costs on 
          electricity provided by the utility (the electricity from the 
          grid that the customer uses when his or her solar panels are not 
          producing, like at night).

          As transmission and distribution costs are typically one-half to 
          two-thirds of a residential customer's billing, full retail NEM 
          offers a substantial subsidy to NEM customers with the costs 
          being shifted to non-NEM customers. Given that rooftop solar now 
          generates 1,173MW in the IOU territories, the cost of full 
          retail NEM comes at a cost of approximately $60 million to 
          non-NEM customers across the state. The Legislature has in the 
          past justified this subsidy as it stimulates the solar industry, 
          helps the state reach its renewable energy goals, and provides 
          other external benefits. 

          The PUC currently is considering a proposed decision that is 
          estimated to drastically increase the MW of rooftop solar 








          SB 1537 (Kehoe)
          Page 1


          eligible under the CSI. At the same time, San Diego Gas & 
          Electric applied to the PUC for a new rate element, called a 
          Network Use Charge, which would in effect charge NEM customers 
          electric distribution costs for energy that the customer 
          receives from the grid. This rate element has been dismissed by 
          the PUC.

          Proposed Law: This bill would create a one-year moratorium on 
          the PUC adopting any new demand charge, standby charge, customer 
          charge, minimum monthly charge, interconnected charge, or other 
          fixed charge that only applies to NEM customers.

          Staff Comments: This bill offers a temporary moratorium on new 
          changes to give the Legislature and the PUC an opportunity to 
          determine what subsidies are still necessary to support the 
          solar market. The PUC estimates that there no fiscal impacts to 
          the agency from this bill. However, the state itself is a 
          substantial electricity consumer using approximately 1.4% of the 
          of the state's electricity. Recognizing that the state is both 
          as a NEM and a non-NEM customer, the state likely pays hundreds 
          of thousands of dollars in subsidies for the CSI program. As 
          this bill prohibits this subsidy from being reduced by charging 
          NEM customers a fee, this bill continues a cost to the state in 
          the hundreds of thousands of dollars.