BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                     SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE
                            Senator Lois Wolk, Chair
          

          BILL NO:  SB 1552                     HEARING:  5/9/12
          AUTHOR:  Gaines                       FISCAL:  Yes
          VERSION:  4/17/12                     TAX LEVY:  Yes
          CONSULTANT:  Grinnell                 

                  TAX CONFORMITY FOR LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE
          

            Conforms state law to federal law relating to specified 
                              insurance contracts.


                           Background and Existing Law  

          California law does not automatically conform to changes to 
          federal tax law, except under specified circumstances.  
          Instead, the Legislature must affirmatively conform to 
          federal changes.  Conformity legislation is introduced 
          either as individual tax bills to conform to specific 
          federal changes, like the Regulated Investment Company 
          Modernization Act (AB 1423, Perea, 2011), or as one omnibus 
          bill that provides that state law conforms to federal law 
          as of a specified date,  currently January 1, 2009 (SB 401, 
          Wolk, 2010).  However, the Legislature modifies or excludes 
          some federal changes due to fiscal or policy reasons during 
          the legislative process - the state neither conforms to 
          federal tax treatment of Health Savings Accounts, nor does 
          it allow the Franchise Tax Board to assess the erroneous 
          claims for refund penalty as the Internal Revenue Service 
          can.

          I.  Annuity Contracts.  Taxpayers can enter into deferred 
          annuity contracts with an insurance company where the 
          taxpayer buys the contract by paying periodic premium, in 
          exchange for a distribution later.  Currently, earnings and 
          profits on amounts invested in a deferred annuity contracts 
          are not subject to tax during the deferral period.  
          However, once the taxpayer starts receiving annuity amounts 
          under the contract, any earnings that exceed contributions 
          are generally subject to tax.  If the taxpayer withdraws 
          amounts before the annuity start date, the amounts are 
          generally included as ordinary income.

          II.  Life Insurance Contracts.  Tax law treats life 




          SB 1552 -- 4/17/12 -- Page 2



          insurance policies more favorably than annuities by 
          generally not taxing earnings.  However, policies must meet 
          either the cash accumulation test or the guidelines premium 
          tax and the corridor test.  Federal law applies a 
          "seven-pay" test on modified endowment contracts, which 
          limits contributions in the first seven years.  Failing to 
          meet the tests disqualifies the policy from the favorable 
          tax treatment.

          III.  Long-Term Care Insurance.  A long-term care insurance 
          contract is an insurance contract that only provides 
          coverage for specified services, such as rehabilitation and 
          personal care services required by a chronically ill 
          individual.  Generally, up to $300 per day may be 
          distributed for services from the policy tax-free.  
          Long-term care insurance may be included as a "rider" on or 
          part of a life insurance contract, allowing for the same 
          tax treatment for distributions made for long-term care 
          services.

          In 2006, Congress enacted the Pension Protection Act (PPA), 
          which changed the tax treatment of annuity and life 
          insurance contracts.  PPA's changes applied to contracts 
          entered into on or after January 1, 1996, but delayed 
          implementation until the 2009 taxable year.  SB 401 did not 
          include these changes, likely due to the fiscal impacts.


                                   Proposed Law  

          Senate Bill 1552 conforms state law to federal law relating 
          to annuity and life insurance contracts in six ways.  The 
          measure takes effect in the 2012 taxable year:
                 The measure excludes from income any charge made 
               against the cash value of an annuity contract or the 
               surrender value of an insurance policy.
                 The bill allows for like-kind exchange treatment 
               for exchanging a life insurance contract, an endowment 
               contract, an annuity contract, or a qualified 
               long-term care insurance contract for a qualified 
               long-term care contract by providing that no loss or 
               gain is realized when taxpayers change one policy for 
               one that provides for long-term care.
                 SB 1552 ensures that an annuity contract or a life 
               insurance policy doesn't lose its preferable tax 
               status simply because it provides for long-term care 





          SB 1552 -- 4/17/12 -- Page 3



               insurance.  
                 The measure disallows the medical expense deduction 
               for any payment made for coverage under a qualified 
               long-term care insurance contract if the payment is 
               made as a charge against the cash value of the annuity 
               contract or the surrender value of the insurance 
               contract.
                 The bill deems tax-exempt trust arrangements not to 
               be annuity contracts for the purposes of long-term 
               coverage.
                 SB 1552 excludes from the guideline premium test 
               any charges against the cash value of a life insurance 
               policy.


                               State Revenue Impact
           
          According to FTB, revenue losses from SB 1552 are estimated 
          to be $30 million in 2012-13, $30 million in 2013-14, and 
          $38 million in 2014-15.



                                     Comments  

          1.   Purpose of the bill  .  According to the author, "SB 1552 
          will bring state law into full conformity regarding long 
          term insurance coverage ensuring equal tax treatment for 
          Californians. Additionally, more people being covered under 
          long term care policies will help relieve the strain on 
          state and federal programs like MediCal and Social Security 
          which will increase efficiency and expediency for others 
          who utilize these programs. "

          2.   Fitting In  .  Conformity helps taxpayers and tax 
          enforcement authorities alike by reducing differences 
          between state and federal tax codes.  However, the process 
          for enacting conformity bills is difficult despite its 
          advantages and reduced tax compliance costs, because the 
          state may disagree with Congress's tax policy changes, and 
          conformity can also significantly impact state revenues - 
          the federal government can run large deficits and print 
          money if need be, but the state cannot.  While the policy 
          elements of SB 1552 aren't controversial except to the 
          extent that the principal beneficiaries will be taxpayers 
          with sufficient income to be able to purchase annuities, 





          SB 1552 -- 4/17/12 -- Page 4



          life insurance contracts, and long-term care policies, its 
          effect on revenue may be.  The Committee may wish to 
          consider whether SB 1552's conformity is worth the cost.  


                         Support and Opposition  (5/3/12)

           Support :  Association of California Life, Health, and 
          Insurance Companies, California Taxpayers' Association.

           Opposition  :  California Tax Reform Association.