BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1563|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1563
          Author:   Cannella (R)
          Amended:  8/6/12
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIRE. COMM.  :  5-0, 04/18/12
          AYES:  Negrete McLeod, Walters, Gaines, Padilla, Vargas

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           SENATE FLOOR  :  38-0, 5/7/12
          AYES:  Alquist, Anderson, Berryhill, Blakeslee, Calderon, 
            Cannella, Corbett, Correa, De Le�n, DeSaulnier, Dutton, 
            Emmerson, Evans, Fuller, Gaines, Hancock, Harman, 
            Hernandez, Huff, Kehoe, La Malfa, Leno, Lieu, Liu, 
            Lowenthal, Negrete McLeod, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Rubio, 
            Simitian, Steinberg, Vargas, Walters, Wolk, Wright, 
            Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Runner, Strickland

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  79-0, 8/16/12 (Consent) - See last page 
            for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Civil service examinations:  veterans 
          preference points

           SOURCE  :     American Legion, Department of California
                      AMVETS, Department of California
                      Vietnam Veterans of America-California State 
          Council

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1563
                                                                Page 
          2


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires that a veteran who has 
          completed acceptable training in the United States Armed 
          Forces as a military law enforcement officer shall receive 
          15 preference points in an examination for an open peace 
          officer position in state employment and states legislative 
          intent with regard to veterans' abilities to become state 
          peace officers.

           Assembly Amendments  require the Commission on Peace Officer 
          Standards and Training (POST) to establish, by regulation, 
          what constitutes "acceptable training" for purposes of the 
          provision.  They also change terminating of a peace officer 
          to military law enforcement officer.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law:

          1.Establishes the state civil service system, which 
            requires a hiring process that is to be based on merit 
            ascertained by competitive examination.

          2.allows state employing agencies to hold open exams for 
            nonpromotional positions in civil service, in which 
            applicants receive points, and based on their scores are 
            placed on ranked hiring lists and are then eligible to be 
            hired into state civil service.

          3.Identifies certain groups of individuals who shall 
            receive additional points based on their status or prior 
            experience, after becoming eligible for a hiring list by 
            obtaining a passing score on an open, nonpromotional 
            exam.

          4.Establishes a number of provisions that provide 
            additional exam points for veterans, disabled veterans, 
            spouses of 100 percent disabled veterans, and widows and 
            widowers of veterans who obtain passing scores on state 
            civil service exams.

          5.Allows a veteran to have 10 points added, and allows a 
            disabled veteran to have 15 points added, to a passing 
            score on an open, nonpromotional exam.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1563
                                                                Page 
          3

          Local:  No

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:

           Absorbable special fund costs to POST to provide 
            guidelines on what constitutes acceptable training. 

           Negligible costs/savings to the extent state entities 
            that hire peace officers, such as the Department of 
            Corrections and Rehabilitation, CHP and Fish and Game opt 
            to hire former military police officers who may or may 
            not be more qualified than their non-military 
            competition. 

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/17/12)

          American Legion, Department of California (co-source) 
          AMVETS, Department of California (co-source) 
          Vietnam Veterans of America-California State Council 
          (co-source) 
          California Association of County Veterans Service Officers
          California State Commanders Veterans Council
          Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/17/12)

          Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (unless 
          amended)

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author, 
          "Returning veterans are at a disadvantage in finding 
          employment upon return from their military service, due to 
          the fact that many have not been able to receive training 
          and experience in any civilian career fields while they 
          were away.  Historically, much of the training that service 
          members receive while in military service does not 
          correlate with many civilian career fields.  Veterans often 
          have years of work experience, but have no way of putting 
          it to use for themselves.  The intent of this legislation 
          is to do just that. Military police training does correlate 
          to a civilian career field and this is an excellent 
          opportunity for veterans to utilize training that they 
          already received in order to gain employment.  It is the 
          duty of California's Legislature to take care of veterans 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1563
                                                                Page 
          4

          and their families.

          The sponsors state, "We support this effort to help some of 
          our returning veterans to utilize their military training 
          to help get civilian jobs, turning boots into badges and 
          giving our veterans credit for their training."

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The Commission on Peace Officer 
          Standards and Training states that they oppose this bill, 
          "?unless it is substantially amended.  Although the intent 
          of this bill is commendable regarding the enhancement of 
          veteran's preference points, it is severely lacking in 
          three fundamental areas:  (1) There is no nexus between 
          military and civilian law enforcement training 
          requirements, (2) SB 1563 creates a costly, new regulation 
          that violates existing POST regulations, under Title II, 
          �and] (3) SB 1563 does not resolve the Military Services 
          historical opposition to releasing training curriculum.

          "If POST were required to evaluate between military police 
          training as part of its basic course waiver process, it 
          would incur both one-time and ongoing costs.  One-time 
          costs are estimated in excess of $150,000 (General Fund) 
          for research, development, validation, and approval of an 
          equivalency process.  It is estimated that the matrix would 
          take 15-18 months to develop, as the disparity in training 
          and missions between the five branches of the armed forces 
          would require pilot testing of the courses to address 
          differences and bring the applicants to a common standard.  
          To support the process upon implementation, POST estimates 
          an annual cost of $206,000 (General Fund) to administer the 
          program."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  79-0, 8/16/12
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, 
            Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 
            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, 
            Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Davis, Dickinson, 
            Donnelly, Eng, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, 
            Beth Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gatto, Gordon, Gorell, 
            Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Roger 
            Hern�ndez, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, 
            Knight, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mansoor, Mendoza, 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1563
                                                                Page 
          5

            Miller, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, 
            Norby, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel P�rez, Portantino, 
            Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, Valadao, 
            Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. P�rez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Lara


          DLW:n   8/17/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****

































                                                           CONTINUED