BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 46
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 10, 2013
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
AB 46 (Pan) - As Amended: March 12, 2013
Policy Committee: Higher
EducationVote:9-3
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill allows a designee to attend meetings of the California
State University (CSU) Board of Trustees (BOT) and act on behalf
of an ex-officio board member. Specifically, this bill:
1)Allows an ex-officio member of the board, except the CSU
Chancellor, to designate a person to represent them at a
trustees' meeting in their absence. A designee cannot attend
closed sessions, and only one person may be designated by an
ex-officio member in any calendar year.
2)Requires the ex-officio member, pursuant to (1), to notify the
board secretary in writing (a) with the name and contact
information of a designee for that calendar year by January
10, and at least (b) 10 business days prior to a meeting if
the ex-officio member will be sending their designee to that
meeting.
3)Allows the student board member, during the first year of
their term, to vote at a board meeting if the other student
board member is absent.
FISCAL EFFECT
Negligible fiscal impact.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . The BOT includes the following ex-officio members:
the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Speaker of the Assembly,
Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the CSU Chancellor.
AB 46
Page 2
In addition, there are two student members appointed by the
Governor for overlapping two-year terms. While they can fully
participate in board discussion and debate, the student member
may only vote in the second year of their term.
According to the author, ex-officio trustees are often not
able to participate in board meetings due to scheduling
conflicts and the first-year student trustee is unable to vote
in the second-year student trustee's absence. The author
asserts that this bill, AB 1965, sponsored by the California
Faculty Association, will facilitate increased representation
of the public and constituents to ensure more responsive and
transparent decision-making by the board.
2)Opposition . CSU is opposed to the bill's provision regarding
ex-officio members, arguing that allowing the substitution of
designees would "negate the importance of having ex-officio
members serve on the BOT in the first place?and "?would seem
to directly contradict the reason they are statutorily named
as BOT members and would undermine the benefit of their unique
perspectives?"
3)Prior Legislation . In 2012, an identical bill (AB 1965, Pan)
passed the Assembly, but was amended in the Senate to address
an unrelated subject. AB 690 (Ammiano) of 2009, AB 1413
(Portantino) of 2007, and AB 2339 (McLeod) of 2004, which were
all substantially similar to this bill, were vetoed by
Governor Schwarzenegger, who argued that the bills created a
disincentive for ex officio members to attend trustee meetings
and diminished the value of an ex officio member's
contribution to the public discourse.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081