Amended in Senate August 5, 2014

Amended in Senate June 18, 2014

Amended in Assembly March 25, 2014

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly Joint ResolutionNo. 36


Introduced by Assembly Member Gonzalez

(Coauthor: Senator Hueso)

February 19, 2014


Assembly Joint Resolution No. 36—Relative to wages.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AJR 36, as amended, Gonzalez. Special Minimum Wage Certificate Program.

This measure would urge the United States Congress to phase out the use of the Special Minimum Wage Certificate provision and eventually repeal Section 14(c) of the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, Meaningful employment, and the wages associated
2with it, can be an integral part of enabling human dignity and
3creating more meaningful lives for disabled persons who choose
4to work; and

5WHEREAS, The State of California has supported opportunities
6for employment for all disabled workers, specifically in the
7adoption of the Employment First Policy for the most vulnerable
8population of disabled workers, which states that “it is the policy
9of the state that opportunities for integrated, competitive
10employment shall be given the highest priority for working age
P2    1individuals with developmental disabilities, regardless of the
2severity of their disabilities”; and

3WHEREAS, The 1938 federal Fair Labor Standards Act sets
4out in Section 14(c) the ability for entities that employ disabled
5persons to obtain special minimum wage certificates from the
6United States Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division
7which entitle them to pay a disabled worker less than the legislated
8minimum wage rate; and

9WHEREAS, The 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act’s subminimum
10wage provisions were created in the era of the Great Depression
11with the intent of subsidizing sheltered workshops which could
12not afford to pay their workers full wages and, some may argue,
13incentivizing private companies to employ disabled persons; and

14WHEREAS, These special wage rates are calculated according
15to productivity with no specified wage floor; and

16WHEREAS, The productivity-based calculation of a special
17minimum wage is generally done by a complicated “time study”
18which entails an administrator comparing how fast a disabled
19worker is able to complete a certain task compared to nondisabled
20workers; and

21WHEREAS, There are differing work and equipment conditions
22beyond the worker’s control, a lack of oversight and enforcement
23by the Wage and Hour Division for the special minimum wage
24certificates, a lack of consistency in the time study tests done by
25employers, and a singling out of disabled workers given that the
26general workforce is not subjected to standards of timed
27productivity; and

28WHEREAS, Time study practices used to determine special
29wage rates are both inconsistent and unfair and the subminimum
30wages they produce have been described by disabled workers
31throughout the media as humiliating, degrading, and making them
32feel like “second-class citizens”; and

33WHEREAS, Some entities have claimed that the special
34minimum wage certificates are an essential stepping stone to
35permanent and fully paid employment in the general workforce.
36The Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal published empirical
37evidence in 2004 which suggested that sheltered workshops are
38generally ineffective at progressing the disabled workers, while
39for other employers the special minimum wage certificates serve
P3    1as an incentive to exploit disabled workers rather than integrate
2them into the mainstream economy; and

3WHEREAS, Some employers, such as the National Industries
4for the Blind, have already recognized the exploitive nature of
5paying disabled workers subminimum wage and have been able
6to transition to the payment of Federal minimum wage, or higher,
7to their disabled employees without a significant change in
8profitability or a reduction in their workforce; and

9WHEREAS, These employers have proven that there are
10workable alternative employment models to Section 14(c) of the
111938 Fair Labor Standards Act for disabled workers, such as
12Employment First, which allow for the successful development of
13individuals by providing quality training and supports for
14individuals with disabilities to obtain competitive integrated
15employment, as well as the successful operation of businesses and
16programs;begin delete now, therefore, be itend deletebegin insert andend insert

begin insert

17WHEREAS, The policy developments regarding disabled youth
18and the need for additional support services, individualized
19employment plans and training, and the prioritization of
20competitive integrated employment in the Workforce Innovation
21and Opportunity Act are consistent with the goals of this resolution
22and the intent to shift away from the use of subminimum wages
23and sheltered workshops for disabled individuals, for which the
24United States Congress should be applauded and encouraged to
25continue working on legislation to better fulfill these goals and
26policy direction; now, therefore, be it

end insert

27Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of
28California, jointly,
That the Legislature of California requests that
29the United States Congress should phase out the use of the Special
30Minimum Wage Certificate provision and eventually repeal Section
3114(c) of the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act to support the goal of
32competitive integrated employment of people with disabilities
33through the use of modern practices of vocational training,
34improved technology, and innovative rehabilitation and
35employment strategies; and be it further

36Resolved, That the Legislature of California requests that prior
37to and during the phasing out of Section 14(c) of the 1938 Fair
38Labor Standards Act the United States Congress (1) promote the
39continuation of existing employment and support models for
40disabled individuals other than Section 14(c) of the 1938 Fair
P4    1Labor Standards Act, as well as further identify and develop
2alternatives of access to a diverse range of employment
3opportunities, to be in place and widely available prior to the
4phasing out of Section 14(c) of the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act;
5(2) continue to collect comprehensive data that accurately reflects
6the number of disabled individuals working, the number of disabled
7individuals seeking employment, and the number of disabled
8individuals who have expressed an interest in working but who
9have not yet been successful in locating and securing gainful
10employment; and (3) continue to utilize strategies which identify
11the industries and types of work in demand in both the public and
12private sector, and the skills and abilities of potential workers with
13disabilities that either exist or need to be developed to move people
14into these positions; and be it further

15Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
16of this resolution to the Speaker of the House of Representatives,
17to the Majority Leader of the Senate, and to each Senator and
18Representative from California in the Congress of the United
19States.



O

    96