California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly Joint ResolutionNo. 50


Introduced by Assembly Member Bloom

August 5, 2014


Assembly Joint Resolution No. 50—Relative to blood donation.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AJR 50, as introduced, Bloom. Blood donation.

This measure would request that the President of the United States encourage, and that the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services adopt, policies that repeal the current donor suitability policies of the federal Food and Drug Administration regarding the donation of blood by men who have had sex with another man.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, California law prohibits discrimination against
2individuals on the basis of actual or perceived sex, sexual
3orientation, gender identity, and gender-related appearance and
4behavior; and

5WHEREAS, The current federal Food and Drug Administration
6(FDA) donor deferral policy, first established in 1983 when the
7FDA had no way of testing blood or plasma for HIV, effectively
8prohibits blood donation by men who have had sex with another
9man even one time since 1977. The FDA essentially classifies all
10sexually active gay and bisexual men in the highest-risk blood
11donor category, the same category as IV drug users and people
12who have spent more than five years since 1980 in a country that
13has mad cow disease. Even with a clean bill of health, a gay man
P2    1is considered more of a threat to the blood supply than a straight
2man who was treated for chlamydia, syphilis, gonorrhea, venereal
3warts, and genital herpes within the past year. In 40 states, a man
4can even give blood immediately following a tattoo or 12 months
5after having sex with a prostitute; and

6WHEREAS, The American Red Cross (ARC) has joined the
7American Association for Blood Banks (AABB) and America’s
8Blood Centers (ABC) in asking for a reevaluation of current donor
9donation deferral policies; and

10WHEREAS, The American Medical Association (AMA) voted
11on June 18, 2013, to oppose the decades long ban by the FDA
12finding it is discriminatory and not based on sound science, and
13recommends that each donor be evaluated on an individual basis
14and not based on their sexual orientation alone; and

15WHEREAS, In May 2013, the nonprofit Canadian Blood
16Services, which manages that nation’s blood supply, announced
17the repeal of the policy banning men who have had sex with
18another man from donating blood and the replacement of that ban
19with a deferral policy; and

20WHEREAS, In February 2010, Sweden reduced its men who
21have sex with another man deferral from a permanent ban to a
2212-month deferral period, joining the nations of Argentina,
23Australia, Brazil, Hungary, Japan, and the United Kingdom. France,
24Spain, Italy, Russia, and Portugal have adopted blood donor
25policies that measure risk against a set of behaviors, sexual and
26otherwise, rather than the sex of a person’s sexual partner or
27partners; and

28WHEREAS, The AABB, ABC, and ARC, on March 9, 2006,
29at the Blood Products Advisory Committee of the FDA, at a
30workshop titled “Behavior-Based Blood Donors Deferrals in the
31Era of Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT),” issued a joint statement
32affirming that they believe that the current lifetime deferral for
33men who have had sex with other men is medically and
34scientifically unwarranted and recommended that the deferral
35criteria be modified and made comparable with criteria for other
36groups at increased risk for sexual transmission of
37transfusion-transmitted infections; and

38WHEREAS, It does not appear rational to broadly differentiate
39sexual transmission via responsible male-to-male sexual activity
40from transmission via responsible heterosexual activity on scientific
P3    1grounds. To many, this differentiation is unfair, creates stigma
2without any justifiable public health imperative, and results in
3negative attitudes to blood donor eligibility criteria and blood
4collection facilities; and

5WHEREAS, Blood banks in the United States routinely operate
6with a short blood supply. After significant disasters or national
7emergencies, the AABB, ABC, and ARC have each reported
8regions operating with less than two days supply of blood; and

9WHEREAS, Many men who have sex with men are healthy, do
10not present a risk of introducing a transfusion transmissible
11infection such as HIV into the nation’s blood supply, and wish to
12be donors without compromising the safety or reliability of the
13supply. These men wish to join their neighbors in expression of a
14common altruistic form of civic engagement; and

15WHEREAS, On July 11, a nationwide blood drive will take
16place to bring attention to the current FDA deferral policy and help
17save lives; and

18WHEREAS, Students and administrators have begun protesting
19the FDA policy, including one notable example from 2008 when
20San Jose State University president Don Kassing banned blood
21drives from the school’s campus, writing in a memo to the campus
22community that the “FDA’s lifetime blood donor deferral affecting
23gay men violates our nondiscrimination policy”; and

24WHEREAS, The AABB, ABC, AMA, HIVMA, and ARC
25acknowledge the concern that a hasty relaxation of deferral criteria
26may add uncertainty to protection of the blood supply unless
27reliable data is available to avoid that result. The blood collectors
28are willing to assist in collecting data regarding the actual impact
29of changes in the deferral, in order to allow for informed
30decisionmaking, and for the development of additional, appropriate
31interventions to ameliorate the impact; and

32WHEREAS, Technological advances such as individual NAT,
33pathogen inactivation, or added means of screening hold promise
34to substantially reduce the risk that transfusion transmissible
35infections from all donors, including men who have had sex with
36men, could be introduced into the blood supply, and federal
37advisory committees have encouraged the FDA to develop these
38technologies further. Within seven to 10 days, it can be said with
3999.9% accuracy whether or not a blood sample is HIV-positive
P4    1and the chance of an HIV-positive blood sample testing negative
2after the seven to 10-day window is about one in two million; and

3WHEREAS, If the current men who have sex with another man
4ban on donation were completely lifted, the Williams Institute
5estimates that an additional 130,150 men would likely donate
6219,200 additional pints of blood each year. That analysis also
7suggests that lifting the ban could increase the total annual United
8States blood supply by 0.6% to 1.4%, which may seem modest,
9but would occur in an environment where blood supply shortages
10are common; and

11WHEREAS, In summary, the AABB, ABC, AMA, HIVMA,
12and ARC believe that the deferral period for men who have had
13sex with other men should be modified and that this consideration
14should also be extended to donors of human cells, tissues, and
15cellular and tissue-based products; and

16WHEREAS, FDA guidelines followed by blood banks
17throughout the United States inadvertently create unjustified stigma
18directed towards gay, bisexual, transgender, and heterosexual males
19on the basis that they have had sex with another male since 1977;
20and

21WHEREAS, The AABB, ABC, and ARC are required to follow
22the FDA guidelines, which consequently are in conflict with state
23nondiscrimination policies; now, therefore, be it

24Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of
25California, jointly,
That the California State Legislature calls upon
26the President of the United States to encourage, and the Secretary
27of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
28to adopt, policies that repeal the current donor suitability policies
29of the FDA regarding blood donation by men who have had sex
30with another man and, instead, direct the FDA to develop
31science-based policies; and be it further

32Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
33of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
34States, to the Secretary of the United States Department of Health
35and Human Services, to the Speaker of the House of
36Representatives, to the Majority Leader of the Senate, and to each
37Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the
38United States.



O

    99