Amended in Assembly August 20, 2014

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly Joint ResolutionNo. 50


Introduced by Assembly Member Bloom

begin insert

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Ammiano, Eggman, and Ting)

end insert
begin insert

(Coauthor: Senator Leno)

end insert

August 5, 2014


Assembly Joint Resolution No. 50—Relative to blood donation.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AJR 50, as amended, Bloom. Blood donation.

This measure would request that the President of the United States encourage, and that the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services adopt, policies that repeal the current donor suitability policies of the federal Food and Drug Administration regarding the donation of blood by men who have had sex with another man.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, California law prohibits discrimination against
2individuals on the basis of actual or perceived sex, sexual
3orientation, gender identity, and gender-related appearance and
4behavior; and

5WHEREAS, The current federal Food and Drug Administration
6(FDA) donor deferral policy, first established in 1983 when the
7FDA had no way of testing blood or plasma for HIV, effectively
8prohibits blood donation by men who have had sex with another
9man even one time since 1977. The FDA essentially classifies all
10sexually active gay and bisexual men in the highest-risk blood
P2    1donor category, the same category as IV drug users and people
2who have spent more than five years since 1980 in a country that
3has mad cow disease. Even with a clean bill of health, a gay man
4is considered more of a threat to the blood supply than a straight
5man who was treated for chlamydia, syphilis, gonorrhea, venereal
6warts, and genital herpes within the past year. In 40 states, a man
7can even give blood immediately following a tattoo or 12 months
8after having sex with a prostitute; and

9WHEREAS, The American Red Cross (ARC) has joined the
10American Association for Blood Banks (AABB) and America’s
11Blood Centers (ABC) in asking for a reevaluation of current donor
12donation deferral policies; and

13WHEREAS, The American Medical Association (AMA) voted
14on June 18, 2013, to oppose the decades long ban by the FDA
15finding it is discriminatory and not based on sound science, and
16recommends that each donor be evaluated on an individual basis
17and not based on their sexual orientation alone; and

18WHEREAS, In May 2013, the nonprofit Canadian Blood
19Services, which manages that nation’s blood supply, announced
20the repeal of the policy banning men who have had sex with
21another man from donating blood and the replacement of that ban
22with a deferral policy; and

23WHEREAS,begin delete In February 2010, Sweden reduced its men who
24have sex with another man deferral from a permanent ban to a
2512-month deferral period, joining the nations of Argentina,
26Australia, Brazil, Hungary, Japan, and the United Kingdom.end delete
begin insert The
27nations of Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Hungary, Japan, Sweden,
28and the United Kingdom, among others, have adopted blood donor
29policies providing a 12-month deferral period for men who have
30had sex with another man. In addition,end insert
France, Spain, Italy, Russia,
31and Portugal have adopted blood donor policies that measure risk
32against a set of behaviors, sexual and otherwise, rather than the
33sex of a person’s sexual partner or partners; and

34WHEREAS, The AABB, ABC, and ARC, on March 9, 2006,
35at the Blood Products Advisory Committee of the FDA, at a
36workshop titled “Behavior-Based Blood Donors Deferrals in the
37Era of Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT),” issued a joint statement
38affirming that they believe that the current lifetime deferral for
39men who have had sex with other men is medically and
40scientifically unwarranted and recommended that the deferral
P3    1criteria be modified and made comparable with criteria for other
2groups at increased risk for sexual transmission of
3transfusion-transmitted infections; and

4WHEREAS, It does not appear rational to broadly differentiate
5sexual transmission via responsible male-to-male sexual activity
6from transmission via responsible heterosexual activity on scientific
7grounds. To many, this differentiation is unfair, creates stigma
8without any justifiable public health imperative, and results in
9negative attitudes to blood donor eligibility criteria and blood
10collection facilities; and

11WHEREAS, Blood banks in the United States routinely operate
12with a short blood supply. After significant disasters or national
13emergencies, the AABB, ABC, and ARC have each reported
14regions operating with less than two days supply of blood; and

15WHEREAS, Many men who have sex with men are healthy, do
16not present a risk of introducing a transfusion transmissible
17infection such as HIV into the nation’s blood supply, and wish to
18be donors without compromising the safety or reliability of the
19supply. These men wish to join their neighbors in expression of a
20common altruistic form of civic engagement; and

21WHEREAS, On July 11,begin insert 2014,end insert a nationwide blood drivebegin delete will
22take placeend delete
begin insert was heldend insert to bring attention to the current FDA deferral
23policy and help save lives; and

24WHEREAS, Students and administrators have begun protesting
25the FDA policy, including one notable example from 2008 when
26San Jose State University president Don Kassing banned blood
27drives from the school’s campus, writing in a memo to the campus
28community that the “FDA’s lifetime blood donor deferral affecting
29gay men violates our nondiscrimination policy”; and

30WHEREAS, The AABB, ABC, AMA,begin delete HIVMA, and ARCend deletebegin insert ARC,
31and the HIV Medicine Association (HIVMA)end insert
acknowledge the
32concern that a hasty relaxation of deferral criteria may add
33uncertainty to protection of the blood supply unless reliable data
34is available to avoid that result. The blood collectors are willing
35to assist in collecting data regarding the actual impact of changes
36in the deferral, in order to allow for informed decisionmaking, and
37for the development of additional, appropriate interventions to
38ameliorate the impact; and

39WHEREAS, Technological advances such as individual NAT,
40pathogen inactivation, or added means of screening hold promise
P4    1to substantially reduce the risk that transfusion transmissible
2infections from all donors, including men who have had sex with
3men, could be introduced into the blood supply, and federal
4advisory committees have encouraged the FDA to develop these
5technologies further. Within seven to 10 days, it can be said with
699.9% accuracy whether or not a blood sample is HIV-positive
7and the chance of an HIV-positive blood sample testing negative
8after the seven to 10-day window is about one in two million; and

9WHEREAS, If the current men who have sex with another man
10ban on donation were completely lifted, the Williams Institute
11estimates that an additional 130,150 men would likely donate
12219,200 additional pints of blood each year. That analysis also
13suggests that lifting the ban could increase the total annual United
14States blood supply by 0.6% to 1.4%, which may seem modest,
15but would occur in an environment where blood supply shortages
16are common; and

17WHEREAS, In summary, the AABB, ABC, AMA, HIVMA,
18and ARC believe that the deferral period for men who have had
19sex with other men should be modified and that this consideration
20should also be extended to donors of human cells, tissues, and
21cellular and tissue-based products; and

22WHEREAS, FDA guidelines followed by blood banks
23throughout the United States inadvertently create unjustified stigma
24directed towards gay, bisexual, transgender, and heterosexual males
25on the basis that they have had sex with another male since 1977;
26and

27WHEREAS, The AABB, ABC, and ARC are required to follow
28the FDA guidelines, which consequently are in conflict with state
29nondiscrimination policies; now, therefore, be it

30Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of
31California, jointly,
That the California State Legislature calls upon
32the President of the United States to encourage, and the Secretary
33of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
34to adopt, policies that repeal the current donor suitability policies
35of the FDA regarding blood donation by men who have had sex
36with another man and, instead, direct the FDA to develop
37science-based policies; and be it further

38Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
39of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
40States, to the Secretary of the United States Department of Health
P5    1and Human Services, to the Speaker of the House of
2Representatives, to the Majority Leader of the Senate, and to each
3Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the
4United States.



O

    98