BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 116
                                                                  Page  1

          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 116 (Bocanegra) 
          As Amended  May 16, 2013
          2/3 vote.  Urgency 

           LOCAL GOVERNMENT                 9-0                HOUSING      
          7-0                 
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Achadjian, Levine, Alejo, |Ayes:|Torres, Beth Gaines,      |
          |     |Bradford, Gordon,         |     |Atkins, Brown, Chau,      |
          |     |Melendez, Mullin,         |     |Maienschein, Mullin       |
          |     |Waldron, Bonta            |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          APPROPRIATIONS               17-0                               
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Gatto, Harkey, Bigelow,   |     |                          |
          |     |Bocanegra,                |     |                          |
          |     |Bradford, Ian Calderon,   |     |                          |
          |     |Campos, Donnelly, Eggman, |     |                          |
          |     |Gomez, Hall, Holden,      |     |                          |
          |     |Linder, Pan, Quirk,       |     |                          |
          |     |Wagner, Weber             |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY  :  Provides an automatic 24-month extension for  
          subdivision maps approved after January 1, 2000, that have not  
          yet expired, and specifies a process for the approval of the  
          extension of maps approved before January 1, 2000.   
          Specifically,  this bill :  

          1)Extends by 24 months the expiration date of any tentative map,  
            vesting tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative  
            map or vesting map that was approved on or after January 1,  
            2000, and that has not yet expired.

          2)Provides, for an approved or conditionally approved tentative  
            map or vesting tentative map, or a parcel map for which the  
            tentative map or vesting tentative map that was approved on or  
            before December 31, 1999, the following:

             a)   Allows the time at which the map expires to be extended  
               for a period of 24 months by the legislative body or by an  








                                                                  AB 116
                                                                  Page  2

               advisory agency authorized to approve or conditionally  
               approve tentative maps, upon a determination that the map  
               is consistent with the applicable zoning and general plan  
               requirements in effect when the application is filed, upon  
               application of the subdivider filed at least 90 days prior  
               to the expiration of the maps;

             b)   Allows, if the map is determined not to be consistent  
               with the applicable zoning and general plan requirements in  
               effect when the application is filed, the legislative body  
               or advisory agency to deny or conditionally approve an  
               extension for a period of 24 months;

             c)   Requires, prior to the expiration of an approved or  
               conditionally approved tentative map, upon an application  
               by the sudivider to extend the map, the map to be  
               automatically extended for 60 days or until the application  
               for the extension is approved, conditionally approved, or  
               denied, whichever occurs last; and,

             d)   Allows, if the advisory agency denies a subdivider's  
               application for an extension, the subdivider to appeal to  
               the legislative body within 15 days after the advisory  
               agency has denied the extension.

          3)Extends the expiration date by 24 months for any legislative,  
            administrative or other approval by a state agency relating to  
            a development project in a subdivision affected by this bill.

          4)Reduces the time limits that a city, county, or city and  
            county cannot add additional requirements on a building permit  
            after a final map is recorded, from five years to three years  
            after the recordation, if the map is extended under using the  
            provisions of this measure. 

          5)Specifies that maps extended under the provisions of this  
            measure are not prohibited from having a city, county, or city  
            and county impose a condition that requires the payment of a  
            fee in the amount in effect upon the issuance of a building  
            permit, as specified. 

          6)Provides that no reimbursement is required because a local  
            agency or school district has the authority to levy service  
            charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the  
            program or level of service mandated by the bill's provisions.








                                                                  AB 116
                                                                  Page  3


           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (Map Act), a  
            statewide regulatory framework for controlling the subdividing  
            of land, which generally requires a subdivider to submit, and  
            have approved by the city, county, or city and county in which  
            the land is situated, a tentative map.

          2)Provides for the expiration of tentative maps after specified  
            periods of time.

          3)Authorizes cities and counties to grant discretionary map  
            extensions as specified.

          4)Extends the expiration date by 24 months for specified  
            subdivision maps that will expire before January 1, 2014.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, there are no state costs.  Local costs for extending  
          expiration dates, if any, would not be reimbursable because  
          local agencies have authority to levy fees and charges to cover  
          their costs.

           COMMENTS  :  Cities and counties, pursuant to the Map Act, approve  
          tentative maps that must be consistent with their general plans,  
          attaching scores of conditions.  Once subdividers comply with  
          those conditions, local officials must issue final maps.  For  
          smaller subdivisions (lot splits) local officials usually use  
          parcel maps, but they can require tentative parcel maps followed  
          by final parcel maps.  These maps follow statutory expiration  
          dates.

          The housing industry saw a major decline in the early 1990s.   
          Because of the difficulty of securing financing, many projects  
          for which maps had already been approved were set to expire,  
          which would have required developers to go through the  
          entitlement process again. To aid in the recovery, SB 428  
          (Thompson), Chapter 407, Statutes of 1993, granted a one-time  
          24-month extension for tentative and parcel maps that had not  
          expired as of the enacting legislation's chaptering date of  
          September 13, 1993.  The Legislature has approved seven such map  
          extension bills since SB 428, the most recent of which was AB  
          208 (Fuentes), Chapter 88, Statutes of 2011.  









                                                                  AB 116
                                                                  Page  4

          Recent amendments address the issue of stale maps by placing a  
          limit on the 24-month automatic extension to only those maps  
          that were approved on or after January 1, 2000, and have not yet  
          expired.  

          The amendments also set up a process for maps approved before  
          January 1, 2000, in order to grant local agencies more  
          discretion.  The amendments require the subdivider, for an older  
          map, to file an application with the local agency at least 90  
          days prior to the expiration of the map.  Should the local  
          agency determine that the map is consistent with applicable  
          zoning and general plan requirements in effect when the  
          application is filed, then the expiration of the map can be  
          extended by 24 months.  If the local agency determines that the  
          map is not consistent with applicable zoning and general plan  
          requirements, the local agency can deny or conditionally approve  
          a 24-month extension.  The bill provides that upon application,  
          the map will be automatically extended for 60 days or until the  
          application for the extension is approved, conditionally  
          approved, or denied, whichever occurs last.  Finally, the bill's  
          provisions specify that if the local agency denies a  
          subdivider's application for an extension, the subdivider can  
          appeal to the legislative body within 15 days after the agency  
          has denied the extension.

          These amendments remove concerns raised by the League of Cities,  
          the California State Association of Counties, and the American  
          Planning Association, California Chapter.

          Support arguments:  Supporters argue that this bill captures and  
          extends the life of a significant portion of the nearly 3,000  
          approved tentative tract and parcel maps in the state, which  
          represents hundreds of construction projects, thousands of  
          construction jobs and billions of dollars directly to state and  
          local coffers.

          Opposition arguments:  None on file.

          This bill is an urgency measure and requires a two-thirds vote  
          of each house.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958 









                                                                  AB 116
                                                                  Page  5


                                                                FN: 0000604