California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly Concurrent ResolutionNo. 101


Introduced by Assembly Member Jones-Sawyer

February 19, 2014


Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 101—Relative to pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

ACR 101, as introduced, Jones-Sawyer. Pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers: Internet transactions.

This measure would request the Department of Justice to convene meetings in 2014 with representatives from law enforcement, prosecutors, and the secondhand dealer and pawnbroker industry to determine the changes to existing law that would (1) allow California pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers to fairly compete with out-of-state internet pawnbrokers, (2) keep available to law enforcement merchandise pawned over the Internet that would otherwise go out-of-state and not be reported or held for inspection, and (3) protect California consumers transacting pawn loans over the Internet from higher interest rates and fees than those permitted in California.

Fiscal committee: yes.

P1    1WHEREAS, In the past decade, a new business model has
2emerged in other states called “Internet pawn.” Operators in other
3less regulated states are aggressively and openly operating in
4California over the Internet, but are not in compliance with the
5laws governing California pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers;
6and

P2    1WHEREAS, Existing law requires that California pawnbrokers
2and secondhand dealers report transactions involving tangible
3personal property using a statewide, uniform electronic reporting
4system developed by the Department of Justice; and

5WHEREAS, Although pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers
6are required to make these electronic reports, existing law poses
7several barriers to electronic pawn loans in California; and

8WHEREAS, Existing law requires the report made by a
9pawnbroker or secondhand dealer to include a legible fingerprint
10taken from the intended seller or pledger. Existing law further
11requires a pawnbroker or secondhand dealer to retain the reported
12tangible personal property for 30 days for possible inspection by
13law enforcement. Out-of-state pawnbrokers are not required to
14collect a fingerprint, nor are they subject to a 30-day hold of the
15property; and

16WHEREAS, As a result, a significant amount of reportable
17merchandise pawned over the Internet that would otherwise be
18reported to the Department of Justice goes unreported and is not
19held for law enforcement; and

20WHEREAS, This puts California pawnbrokers and secondhand
21dealers at a competitive disadvantage. In addition, merchandise
22pawned over the Internet escapes detection by law enforcement
23and is physically absent from the state as soon as the transaction
24is completed; and

25WHEREAS, California has been a leader in consumer protection
26for decades; and

27WHEREAS, California pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers
28provide loans at the lowest interest rates in the United States.
29California law caps interest rates and fees applicable to these
30transactions at very low levels. In other states, the interest rates
31are either capped at much higher levels or are completely
32unregulated; and

33WHEREAS, There are impediments to a licensed pawnbroker
34or secondhand dealer in California transacting business solely on
35the Internet. Unlike any other lending model in California, the
36physical presence of the borrower is required in order to obtain
37the legally required fingerprint; and

38WHEREAS, The convenience of transacting a pawn loan over
39the Internet from one’s home is proving to be a powerful lure to
40Californians who would ordinarily transact that loan at a physical
P3    1pawn shop. As the world becomes more dependent on the Internet,
2secondhand dealers and pawnbrokers in California will lose a
3greater market share to out-of-state Internet pawn; Californians
4who choose that form of pawn will also be subject to higher interest
5rates and fees. In addition, law enforcement will lose a greater
6percentage of tangible personal property reports and will lose the
7ability to inspect and seize property needed for criminal
8investigation and prosecution; and

9WHEREAS, Good public policy demands that the Legislature
10address this inequity that is so harmful to California business,
11California consumers, and law enforcement; now, therefore, be it

12Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate
13thereof concurring,
That the Legislature requests the Department
14of Justice to convene meetings in 2014 with representatives from
15law enforcement, prosecutors, and the secondhand dealer and
16pawnbroker industry to determine the changes to existing law that
17would (1) allow California pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers
18to fairly compete with out-of-state Internet pawnbrokers, (2) keep
19available to law enforcement merchandise pawned over the Internet
20that would otherwise go out-of-state and not be reported or held,
21and (3) protect California consumers transacting pawn loans over
22the Internet from higher interest rates and fees than those permitted
23in California; and be it further

24Resolved, The Department of Justice is requested to report its
25findings and recommendations for statutory change to the
26Legislature by January 1, 2015; and be it further

27Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
28of this resolution to the Department of Justice and to the author
29for appropriate distribution.



O

    99