Amended in Senate June 16, 2014

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly Concurrent ResolutionNo. 101


Introduced by Assembly Member Jones-Sawyer

February 19, 2014


Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 101—Relative to pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

ACR 101, as amended, Jones-Sawyer. Pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers: Internet transactions.

This measure would request the Department of Justice to convene meetings in 2014 with representatives from law enforcement, prosecutors,begin delete andend delete the secondhand dealer and pawnbroker industrybegin insert, and interested members of the publicend insert to determine the changes to existing law that would (1) allow California pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers to fairly compete with out-of-state internet pawnbrokers, (2) keep available to law enforcement merchandise pawned over the Internet that would otherwise go out-of-state and not be reported or held for inspection, and (3) protect California consumers transacting pawn loans over the Internet from higher interest rates and fees than those permitted in California.

Fiscal committee: yes.

P1    1WHEREAS, In the past decade, a new business model has
2emerged in other states called “Internet pawn.” Operators in other
3less regulated states are aggressively and openly operating in
4California over the Internet, but are not in compliance with the
P1    1laws governing California pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers;
2and

3WHEREAS, Existing law requires that California pawnbrokers
4and secondhand dealers report transactions involving tangible
5personal property using a statewide, uniform electronic reporting
6system developed by the Department of Justice; and

7WHEREAS, Although pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers
8are required to make these electronic reports, existing law poses
9several barriers to electronic pawn loans in California; and

10WHEREAS, Existing law requires the report made by a
11pawnbroker or secondhand dealer to include a legible fingerprint
12taken from the intended seller or pledger. Existing law further
13requires a pawnbroker or secondhand dealer to retain the reported
14tangible personal property for 30 days for possible inspection by
15law enforcement. Out-of-state pawnbrokers are not required to
16collect a fingerprint, nor are they subject to a 30-day hold of the
17property; and

18WHEREAS, As a result, a significant amount of reportable
19merchandise pawned over the Internet that would otherwise be
20reported to the Department of Justice goes unreported and is not
21held for law enforcement; and

22WHEREAS, This puts California pawnbrokers and secondhand
23dealers at a competitive disadvantage. In addition, merchandise
24pawned over the Internet escapes detection by law enforcement
25and is physically absent from the state as soon as the transaction
26is completed; and

27WHEREAS, California has been a leader in consumer protection
28for decades; and

29WHEREAS, California pawnbrokersbegin delete and secondhand dealersend delete
30 provide loans at the lowest interest rates in the United States.
31California law caps interest rates and fees applicable to these
32transactions at very low levels. In other states, the interest rates
33are either capped at much higher levels or are completely
34unregulated; and

35WHEREAS, There are impediments to a licensed pawnbroker
36or secondhand dealer in California transacting business solely on
37the Internet. Unlike any other lending model in California, the
38physical presence of the borrower is required in order to obtain
39the legally required fingerprint; and

P3    1WHEREAS, The convenience of transacting a pawn loan over
2the Internet from one’s home is proving to be a powerful lure to
3Californians who would ordinarily transact that loan at a physical
4pawn shop. As the world becomes more dependent on the Internet,
5secondhand dealers and pawnbrokers in California will lose a
6greater market share to out-of-state Internet pawn; Californians
7who choose that form of pawn will also be subject to higher interest
8rates and fees. In addition, law enforcement will lose a greater
9percentage of tangible personal property reports and will lose the
10ability to inspect and seize property needed for criminal
11investigation and prosecution; and

12WHEREAS, Good public policy demands that the Legislature
13address this inequity that is so harmful to California business,
14California consumers, and law enforcement; now, therefore, be it

15Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate
16thereof concurring,
That the Legislature requests the Department
17of Justice to convene meetings in 2014 with representatives from
18law enforcement, prosecutors,begin delete andend delete the secondhand dealer and
19pawnbroker industrybegin insert, and interested members of the publicend insert to
20determine the changes to existing law that would (1) allow
21California pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers to fairly compete
22with out-of-state Internet pawnbrokers, (2) keep available to law
23enforcement merchandise pawned over the Internet that would
24otherwise go out-of-state and not be reported or held, and (3)
25protect California consumers transacting pawn loans over the
26Internet from higher interest rates and fees than those permitted
27in California; and be it further

28Resolved, The Department of Justice is requested to report its
29findings and recommendations for statutory change to the
30Legislature by January 1, 2015; and be it further

31Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
32of this resolution to the Department of Justice and to the author
33for appropriate distribution.



O

    98