BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       ACR 101|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  ACR 101
          Author:   Jones-Sawyer (D)
          Amended:  6/16/14 in Senate
          Vote:     21


          SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  5-1, 6/10/14
          AYES:  Jackson, Anderson, Lara, Leno, Monning
          NOES:  Vidak
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Corbett

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 8/14/14
          AYES:  De Le�n, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters, Gaines

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  72-0, 5/5/14 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers:  Internet  
          transactions

           SOURCE  :     California Pawnbrokers Association


           DIGEST  :    This resolution requests the Department of Justice  
          (DOJ) to convene meetings in 2014 with representatives from law  
          enforcement, prosecutors, the secondhand dealer and pawnbroker  
          industries and interested members of the public to recommend  
          changes to existing law pertaining to Internet pawnbroking.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    ACR 101
                                                                     Page  
          2


          1.Includes a statement of legislative intent to curtail the  
            dissemination of stolen property, to facilitate the recovery  
            of stolen property and to detect possible sales tax evasion by  
            means of a uniform, statewide, state-administered program of  
            regulation of persons whose principal business is dealing in  
            tangible personal property, as specified.

          2.Includes legislative intent that reports of transactions in  
            pawned and second-hand property should be correlated with law  
            enforcement reports so as to trace and recover stolen  
            property.

          3.Defines a "second-hand dealer" to mean any person or entity  
            whose business includes buying, selling, trading, taking in  
            pawn, accepting for sale on consignment, accepting for  
            auctioning, or auctioning second-hand tangible personal  
            property.  Specifies that a "second-hand dealer" does not  
            include a "coin dealer" or participants at gun shows or  
            events, persons who perform the services of an auctioneer, or  
            persons whose business is limited to the reconditioning and  
            selling of major household appliances, as specified.

          4.Defines "tangible personal property" to mean:  (a) all  
            second-hand personal property that has a serial number or  
            personalized markings; (b) all tangible property, new or used,  
            taken by a pawnbroker as security for a loan; and (c) all  
            tangible personal property commonly sold by second-hand  
            dealers that constitutes a significant class of stolen  
            property.  Provides that tangible personal property does not  
            include coins, monetized bullion, or commercial grade ingots  
            of precious metals.

          5.Defines a "pawnbroker" to mean a person engaged in the  
            business of receiving goods in pledge for security for a  
            loan."

          6.Defines a "coin dealer" to mean any person, firm, partnership,  
            or corporation whose principal business is the buying,  
            selling, and trading of coins, monetized bullion, or  
            commercial grade ingots of gold, or silver, or other precious  
            metals.

          7.Requires every second-hand dealer and coin dealer to report  







                                                                    ACR 101
                                                                     Page  
          3

            daily to law enforcement, on forms or through an electronic  
            reporting system approved by DOJ, all second-hand tangible  
            personal property, except for firearms, which he/she has  
            purchased, taken in trade, taken in pawn, accepted for sale on  
            consignment, or accepted for auctioning, as specified.   
            Specifies that such reports shall include, among other things,  
            a complete and reasonably accurate description of the property  
            acquired, a certification by the intended seller or pledger  
            that he/she is the owner of the property or has the authority  
            of the owner to sell or pledge the property, and a legible  
            fingerprint taken from the intended seller or pledger, as  
            specified.

          8.Requires every second-hand dealer and coin dealer to retain in  
            his/her possession for a period of 30 days all tangible  
            personal property reported in a daily report.  Requires every  
            second-hand dealer and coin dealer to produce tangible  
            personal property reported in a daily report for inspection by  
            law enforcement.

          9.Provides that it is unlawful for any person to engage in the  
            business of a second-hand dealer without being licensed for  
            such activity.

          10.Provides that a district attorney or the Attorney General may  
            seek an injunction to stop or prevent a violation of the laws  
            governing transactions in pawned and second-hand goods.

          11.Provides that when a peace officer has probable cause to  
            believe that property, other than coins and precious metal  
            ingots, in the possession of a pawnbroker, second-hand dealer,  
            or coin dealer is stolen, the officer may place a hold on the  
            property for up to 90 days.  Prohibits the pawnbroker or  
            dealer from releasing or disposing of the property without a  
            court order or written receipt from an officer of the agency  
            that placed the hold.  Requires the pawnbroker or dealer to  
            produce and deliver the property to a peace officer for  
            purposes of a criminal investigation.

          12.Requires, if property reported as lost, stolen, or embezzled  
            is found in the possession of a pawnbroker, second-hand  
            dealer, or coin dealer, that the law enforcement agency shall  
            provide written notice to the person who reported the property  
            lost or stolen containing specified information or statements.







                                                                    ACR 101
                                                                     Page  
          4


          13.Provides that if a pledger of property (person using the  
            property as collateral for a loan) attempts to retrieve the  
            property during the holding period, the pawnbroker is required  
            to inform the pledger of the name of the peace officer and law  
            enforcement agency that placed the hold.  If the property is  
            no longer needed for an investigation, the hold must be  
            released.

          14.Requires that whenever property alleged to have been lost,  
            stolen, or embezzled is taken from a pawnbroker, the peace  
            officer, magistrate, court, clerk, or other person having  
            custody of the property shall not deliver the property to any  
            person claiming ownership unless:

             A.   The person making a claim of ownership files a written  
               statement, signed under penalty of perjury, stating the  
               factual basis upon which they claim ownership or an  
               interest in the property with the person having custody of  
               the property;

             B.   The person having custody of the property notifies the  
               pawnbroker of the claim by providing a true and correct  
               copy of the claim to the pawnbroker; and

             C.   The pawnbroker makes no claim with respect to the  
               property within 10 days of such notification.

          1.Requires, except as specified, that if the ownership of stolen  
            or embezzled property and address of the owner and security  
            can be ascertained, the peace officer in custody of the  
            property shall notify by mail the owner and security holder,  
            as specified.

          2.Requires, if law enforcement identifies serialized property or  
            other property reported stolen or lost that has been listed in  
            the electronic reporting system maintained by DOJ, the agency  
            shall notify the owner or person claiming to be entitled to  
            possession of the property within 15 days.  If a pawnbroker or  
            second-hand dealer reported his/her acquisition of the  
            property to law enforcement, the owner must be given the  
            contact information of the pawnbroker or dealer and be  
            informed of the law concerning retrieval of property from the  
            business.  If the property is no longer needed as evidence, it  







                                                                    ACR 101
                                                                     Page  
          5

            must be returned to the owner, as specified.

          3.Permits a pawnbroker to charge fees pursuant to a set schedule  
            of charges that are based upon the amount of the loan,  
            including a charge not exceeding $1 in any loan for not more  
            than 30 days which does not exceed $14.99.  Provides that  
            charges for the first 90 days of a loan shall be determined by  
            that schedule of charges.  Charges for any period of time  
            following the first 90 days of the loan shall be determined by  
            application of the schedule of maximum compensation.

          4.Limits the maximum compensation a pawnbroker may receive in  
            connection with a loan secured by pledged property to a rate  
            not exceeding 2.5% per month on the unpaid principal balance  
            of a loan after the first 90 days, as specified.

          5.Limits the amounts a pawnbroker may charge as a loan setup fee  
            and as a handling and storage fee.

          This resolution:

          1.Makes specific findings and declarations regarding a type of  
            out-of-state pawnbroking business called "Internet pawn,"  
            states that this type of business fails to comply with  
            existing law governing pawnbrokers and second-hand dealers,  
            and states that these unlawful "Internet pawn" businesses  
            place California pawnbrokers and second-hand dealers at a  
            competitive disadvantage.

          2.Calls upon DOJ to convene meetings in 2014 with  
            representatives from law enforcement, prosecutors, the  
            second-hand dealer and pawnbroker industry and interested  
            members of the public to determine the changes to existing law  
            that:  (a) allow California pawnbrokers and second-hand  
            dealers to fairly compete with out-of-state Internet  
            pawnbrokers; (b) keep available to law enforcement merchandise  
            pawned over the Internet that would otherwise go out-of-state  
            and not be reported or held; and (c) protect California  
            consumers transacting pawn loans over the Internet from higher  
            interest rates and fees than those permitted in California.   
            This resolution additionally requests DOJ to report its  
            findings and recommendations for statutory change to the  
            Legislature by January 1, 2015.








                                                                    ACR 101
                                                                     Page  
          6

           Background
           
          Until recently, second-hand goods merchants and pawnbrokers in  
          the United States have been confined to doing business out of  
          fixed storefronts with customers who visit their physical retail  
          locations.  This geographical limitation has historically  
          allowed each state to regulate the activities of second-hand  
          dealers and pawnbrokers doing business within their state as  
          they saw fit.  For second-hand goods merchants and pawnbrokers  
          doing business in California, existing law governs many aspects  
          of how these businesses operate.  The Legislature, for example,  
          has enacted various laws to both curtail the dissemination and  
          facilitate the recovery of stolen property, including property  
          acquired by pawnbrokers and second-hand dealers, knowing that  
          these merchants are often utilized by individuals attempting to  
          sell or pawn stolen or embezzled property.

          Generally, existing law requires all second-hand dealers,  
          including pawnbrokers, and coin dealers to report daily to law  
          enforcement every piece of tangible personal property that they  
          purchase, take in trade, take in pawn, accept for sale on  
          consignment, or accept for auctioning, using an electronic  
          reporting system maintained by DOJ.  Property so acquired by  
          second-hand dealers must be held for at least 30 days and must  
          be produced or surrendered to law enforcement when it is  
          reasonably thought that the property was lost, stolen, or  
          embezzled.  Existing law also regulates the terms by which  
          pawnbrokers may offer loans secured by tangible property to  
          consumers, including placing caps on loan setup fees, handling  
          and storage fees, and caps on maximum compensation.

          With the advent of the Internet, however, some out-of-state  
          pawnbrokers have taken to transacting business with California  
          residents online, using the Internet and express delivery  
          companies to accomplish what used to be done at retail  
          storefronts.  According to a recent article:

          For consumers, it means that instead of plopping a castoff  
          wedding ring, camera or china platter onto the counter of a  
          local pawnshop, you do the entire transaction online and by  
          mail. . . . The appeal:  Online pawning is relatively quick,  
          completely private, and there's no stigma of walking into a  
          public place with your personal possessions to hock.  And if you  
          default on your loan, nothing gets reported to a credit bureau.   







                                                                    ACR 101
                                                                     Page  
          7

          (Buck, Pawnshop has spread to the Internet (Mar. 19, 2012) The  
          Minneapolis Star Tribune  (as of May 26, 2014).

          Despite its convenience for consumers, the ability of  
          out-of-state pawnbrokers and second-hand goods merchants to  
          remotely offer services to Californians may, in effect, leave  
          California residents unprotected when these merchants transact  
          business in violation of existing California law.  According to  
          the same article, one California pawnshop owner argues that  
          these online pawn shops are "in direct competition with  
          California pawnbrokers," adding that "it's an uneven matchup,  
          since existing California law requires walk-in pawnshop  
          customers to provide I.D., fingerprints and a signature.  Local  
          shops also must report each item they receive to law enforcement  
          to thwart stolen goods.  They can't conduct any business  
          online."

           Prior Legislation
           
          SB 762 (Hill, Chapter 318, Statutes of 2013) clarified the  
          rights and interests of licensed pawnbrokers and second-hand  
          dealers in property seized from a pawnbroker where a criminal  
          investigation or case involving the property has been resolved  
          or terminated.  The bill also modified procedures for a law  
          enforcement agency to seize lost, stolen, or embezzled property  
          from a pawnbroker or second-hand dealer, including authorizing a  
          law enforcement officer to seize property, with or without a  
          warrant, if the pawnbroker or second-hand dealer in possession  
          of the property refuses to place a hold on the property.

          AB 391 (Pan, Chapter 172, Statutes of 2012) required second-hand  
          dealers and coin dealers to report specified transactions  
          involving tangible personal property using an electronic  
          reporting system administered by DOJ, and requires DOJ to charge  
          specified licensure and renewal fees for the purpose of funding  
          the electronic reporting system.

          AB 704 (Ma, 2011) would have required a person conducting  
          business as a second-hand dealer to provide a valid second-hand  
          dealer's license to any peace officer upon demand and would have  
          authorized a peace officer to impound all tangible personal  
          property found in the possession or control of the person if a  
          second-hand dealer's license is not provided, as specified.  The  







                                                                    ACR 101
                                                                     Page  
          8

          bill also would have authorized the imposition of storage  
          charges for impounded personal property and would have  
          authorized a nonprofit association composed of 50 or more  
          licensed second-hand dealers to bring an action to enjoin a  
          person from conducting business as a second-hand dealer without  
          being licensed.  The bill died in the Assembly Committee on  
          Judiciary.

          SB 1893 (Burton, 2004) would have required all second-hand  
          tangible personal property acquired by a second-hand dealer,  
          coin dealer, business machine dealer, and pawnbroker to be  
          reported electronically in an electronic data reporting system  
          to be developed by DOJ, and would have extended existing  
          licensure requirements to include coin dealers and business  
          machine dealers.  The bill died in the Assembly Committee on  
          Business and Professions.

          SB 1520 (Schiff, Chapter 994, Statutes of 2000) required DOJ to  
          develop an electronic reporting system for reporting all  
          tangible personal property purchased, taken in trade or pawn, or  
          accepted for sale on consignment or for auctioning, by  
          second-hand dealers and coin dealers.  The bill exempted from  
          the electronic reporting requirement a coin dealer who engages  
          in less than 10 transactions each week each consisting of not  
          more than one item.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Fiscal Com.:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, potential  
          one-time costs in the range of $50,000 to $100,000 (General  
          Fund) for DOJ to hold stakeholder meetings and to report to the  
          Legislature.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/15/14)

          California Pawnbrokers Association (source)
          National Federation of Independent Business

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/15/14)

          Antiques-by-the-bay
          Auctions-by-the-bay

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author writes:







                                                                    ACR 101
                                                                     Page  
          9


          Competition from out-of-state pawnbrokers using the internet has  
          become a significant problem for California pawnbrokers, as they  
          are unable to compete against the internet-based business model  
          due to the requirement to obtain a fingerprint from the  
          borrower.  The technology to transmit an electronic fingerprint,  
          and reliably link it to the borrower does not exist. . . . [It  
          is estimated] that approximately 9% of the pawn transactions  
          that originate in California are currently being done by  
          out-of-state pawnbrokers.  Logic suggests that this number will  
          exponentially increase each year as internet use increases.  Law  
          enforcement never gets a report on these items, and out-of-state  
          brokers are not subject to the 30-day hold requirement.   
          Therefore, by enabling California pawnbrokers to do internet  
          transactions, law enforcement would be getting daily reports of  
          these items and would be able to inspect them during the hold  
          period as they currently do with in-store transactions.

          This resolution requests that DOJ convene stakeholder meetings  
          in 2014 with representatives from law enforcement, prosecutors  
          and the second-hand dealer and pawnbroker industry to identify  
          changes in existing law which would allow second-hand dealers  
          and pawnbrokers to conduct Internet-based business.

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    Per the Senate Judiciary Committee  
          analysis, Antiques-by-the-bay and Auctions-by-the-bay, two  
          sister companies that promote antique shows and provide auction  
          services, respectively, oppose the inclusion of "second-hand  
          dealers" in this resolution.  They argue that "existing law has  
          long and incorrectly confused second-hand dealers with  
          pawnbrokers," and suggest that since the stakeholder meetings to  
          be held pursuant to the resolution will chiefly address problems  
          with Internet pawnbroking, second-hand dealers ought to be  
          removed from the resolution.

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  72-0, 5/5/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Bloom,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon,  
            Campos, Chau, Ch�vez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley, Dababneh, Daly,  
            Dickinson, Eggman, Fong, Fox, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia,  
            Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gorell, Gray, Grove, Hagman,  
            Hall, Harkey, Roger Hern�ndez, Holden, Jones, Jones-Sawyer,  
            Levine, Linder, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Medina, Mullin,  
            Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea,  







                                                                    ACR 101
                                                                     Page  
          10

            V. Manuel P�rez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas,  
            Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner, Waldron,  
            Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, John A. P�rez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bigelow, Bonta, Dahle, Donnelly, Logue,  
            Mansoor, Melendez, Vacancy


          AL:e  8/15/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****