BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 179
Page 1
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 179 (Bocanegra and Levine)
As Amended April 24, 2013
Majority vote
TRANSPORTATION 16-0 APPROPRIATIONS 16-0
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Ayes:|Lowenthal, Linder, |Ayes:|Gatto, Harkey, Bigelow, |
| |Achadjian, Ammiano, | |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian |
| |Blumenfield, Bonta, | |Calderon, Campos, Eggman, |
| |Buchanan, Daly, Frazier, | |Gomez, Hall, Ammiano, |
| |Gatto, Holden, Logue, | |Linder, Pan, Quirk, |
| |Morrell, Nazarian, | |Wagner, Weber |
| |Patterson, Quirk-Silva | | |
|-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
| | | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Expands privacy protections currently afforded to
electronic toll collection subscribers to include users of
electronic transit fare collection systems. Specifically, this
bill :
1)Expands provisions of existing law related to ensuring the
privacy of electronic toll collection system subscribers to
include users of public transit systems that employ electronic
transit fare collections systems.
2)Specifically provides that, with respect to the prohibition
against sharing personally identifiable information, the
prohibition does not apply to the sharing of data between
transportation agencies for the sole purpose of providing
interoperability between the agencies.
3)Expands the definition of "transportation agency" to include
any transportation agency that administers an electronic
transit fare collection system and any transit operator
participating in that system.
4)Defines "electronic transit fare collection system" to mean a
system for issuing electronic transit passes that allow
passengers to use the transit systems of one or more transit
operators without having to pay individual fares.
AB 179
Page 2
EXISTING LAW :
1)Defines, for purposes of privacy provisions related to
electronic toll collections systems, "transportation agency"
as the Department of Transportation, the Bay Area Toll
Authority, any entity operating a toll bridge, toll lane, or
toll highway, or any entity operating under contract with such
an agency.
2)Prohibits transportation agencies from selling or
disseminating personally identifiable information about
persons who subscribe to an electronic toll collection system,
with limited exceptions.
3)Requires transportation agencies that use electronic toll
collection systems to establish privacy policies and to
provide those policies to subscribers.
4)Authorizes transportation agencies to store specific
account-related information such as an account holder's name,
credit card number, vehicle information, and billing address;
all other information must be discarded within four years and
six months after the closure date of the billing cycle and
after the bill has been paid and all toll violations, if
applicable, have been resolved.
5)Requires transportation agencies to make every effort to purge
data on closed accounts; in no case may data be stored longer
than four years and six months after an account has been
closed or terminated.
6)Allows transportation agencies to make personally identifiable
information available to law enforcement agencies pursuant to
a search warrant; generally requires a law enforcement agency
to notify, within five days, a person that their information
has been obtained from a transportation agency.
7)Allows peace officers conducting criminal or traffic collision
investigations to obtain personally identifiable information
of subscribers without a search warrant if the officer has
good cause to believe that a delay in obtaining the
information via a search warrant would cause an adverse
result, as defined.
AB 179
Page 3
8)Allows transportation agencies to provide aggregated traveler
information derived from collective data that relates to a
group or category of subscribers, provided that personally
identifiable information has been removed.
9)Allows data to be shared among transportation agencies, in
order to comply with state inter-operability requirements for
electronic toll collection systems.
10)Authorizes a transportation agency to impose an
administrative fee to cover costs associated with implementing
these privacy requirements.
11)Provides, generally, that video recordings made by security
systems on public transit systems must be retained for one
year.
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, any additional costs to local transit agencies will
not be state-reimbursable, because the agencies have existing
authority to recover their costs through administrative fees.
COMMENTS : The author introduced this bill to protect the
privacy of public transportation patrons who use an electronic
transit pass by limiting the use of personal information that is
collected every time the pass is swiped, or tapped. This bill's
introduction follows media accounts of privacy concerns related
to electronic fare collection systems.
One such system is the "Clipper" card system used in the San
Francisco Bay Area. The Clipper card allows a transit user to
pay fares on multiple transit systems using one card. Users can
add value to their card at any point or they can set up their
card to automatically reload whenever their pass expires or
their cash balance falls below $10. Users of the Clipper card
are not required to register their card, however. If a card is
unregistered, use of the system is linked to the card's serial
number only and the system has no personal information about the
cardholder.
The Clipper card privacy policy states that, for patrons who
choose to register their Clipper card, their personally
identifiable information may be disclosed to third-party service
providers (e.g., contractor personnel who operate and maintain
AB 179
Page 4
the Clipper card service) for the purpose of operating and
maintaining the Clipper system; otherwise, personal information
is not to be disclosed to third parties, except as required by
law, ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction, or where the
express written consent of the cardholder has been obtained.
The Transit Access Pass system in the Los Angeles area and the
Compass card system in the San Diego area operate similar to the
Clipper card system and both have nearly identical privacy
policies.
Writing in support of this bill, the American Civil Liberties
Union (ACLU) argues, "Location privacy issues are of serious
concern to the ACLU. [AB 179] extends the privacy protections
already in place to another transit system that creates and
stores digital records of people's movements. Divorce lawyers
and law enforcement agencies are very interested in obtaining
records of individual's movements. It's important to have clear
and consistent standards in place."
Opponents of this bill raise a number of concerns related to
safety, data retention, and interoperability. For example, both
the Orange County Transportation Authority and the Riverside
Transit Agency are opposing the bill, in part, because they
believe the bill will hinder their ability to share video
surveillance information captured on its buses with police
without a search warrant or good cause. Both agencies are
concerned that delaying the release of this information poses a
safety risk to the community by impeding successful apprehension
of criminals or successful recovery of missing persons.
Previous legislation : AB 839 (Salinas), Chapter 564, Statutes of
2003, provides that videotapes or recordings made by a security
camera system operated as part of a public transit system must
be retained for one year.
SB 1268 (Simitian), Chapter 489, Statutes of 2010, imposed
privacy protections on electronic toll collection systems.
Analysis Prepared by : Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093
FN: 0000460
AB 179
Page 5