BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 388
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 388 (Chesbro)
          As Amended  August 18, 2014
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |     |(May 6, 2013)   |SENATE: |34-0 |(August 19,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2014)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
               (vote not relevant)

          Original Committee Reference:    HIGHER ED.  

           SUMMARY  :  Specify that dependent wards of the juvenile court are  
          not unnecessarily subject to detention or other sanctions  
          because of that status.  

           The Senate amendments  delete the Assembly version of the bill,  
          and instead:  

          1)Provide additional specified protocols between probation and  
            child welfare services concerning minors who are subject to  
            both delinquency and dependency proceedings.

          2)Take into consideration the circumstances of conduct that  
            occurs in a group home in determining whether dependency or  
            delinquency status would best serve the interests of the minor  
            and society.

          3)Provide that detention decisions shall not be based on  
            dependency status or placement issues.

          4)Require that social services be ordered to ensure foster  
            parents or other caregivers for a dependent ward who is  
            ordered released take physical custody of the minor, or ensure  
            the minor is placed appropriately.

          5)Provide that if a minor is a dependent ward of the court, the  
            court's decision to detain shall not be based on the minor's  
            status as a dependent of the court or the child welfare  
            services department's inability to provide a placement for the  
            minor.

          6)Provide that a decision to detain a child cannot be based on  
            status as a dependent ward or the inability of welfare  








                                                                  AB 388
                                                                  Page  2

            services to provide a placement for the minor.

          7)Provide that the court's decision to detain a minor who is a  
            dependent ward of the court shall not be based on a finding  
            that continuance in the minor's current placement is contrary  
            to the minor's welfare, and if it is, require the court to  
            order the child welfare services department to place the minor  
            into another licensed or approved placement.

          8)Require the court to waive a restitution fine of a dependent  
            minor for conduct occurring under the supervision of a foster  
            home, group home, or other licensed facility that provides  
            residential care for minors, and additionally provide that if  
            the victim is a group home or licensed residential facility in  
            which the minor was placed, or an employee the facility,  
            restitution shall be limited to out-of-pocket expenses that  
            are not covered by insurance and are paid by the facility or  
            employee.  

          9)Additionally makes a number of changes relating to group homes  
            and licensed residential facilities which provide placements  
            for dependent children, as specified.
           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires county child welfare departments and county probation  
            departments to jointly develop a written protocol regarding  
            minors who appear to come within both dependency jurisdiction,  
            pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code Section (WIC) 300 et  
            seq., and delinquency jurisdiction, pursuant to WIC Section  
            600 et seq. (WIC Section 241.1)

          2)Requires the county welfare and county probation departments,  
            pursuant to the joint protocol, to make a recommendation to  
            the court regarding which initial status of a minor who  
            appears to come within both dependency and delinquency  
            jurisdiction would best serve the interests of the minor and  
            the protection of society. (WIC Section 241.1)

          3)Provides for the temporary custody and detention of minors in  
            specified circumstances, and provides for the court to make  
            its order releasing the minor from custody after hearing  
            relevant evidence, as specified.  (WIC Section 635.)

          4)Provides that if "the probation officer has reason to believe  
            that the minor is at-risk of entering foster care placement as  








                                                                  AB 388
                                                                  Page  3

            defined by [WIC] Section 11402, then the probation officer  
            shall submit a written report to the court containing all of  
            the following: the reasons why the minor has been removed from  
            the parent's custody; any prior referrals for abuse or neglect  
            of the minor or any prior filings regarding the minor pursuant  
            to [WIC] Section 300; the need, if any, for continued  
            detention; the available services that could facilitate the  
            return of the minor to the custody of the minor's parents or  
            guardians; and whether there are any relatives who are able  
            and willing to provide effective care and control over the  
            minor."  (WIC Section 635.)

          5)Provides the court with authority to make and order in certain  
            circumstances that a minor be detained in the juvenile hall or  
            other suitable place designated by the juvenile court for a  
            period not to exceed 15 judicial days, as specified.  (WIC  
            Section 636.)

          6)Provides that before detaining the minor, the court shall  
            determine whether continuance in the home is contrary to the  
            minor's welfare and whether there are available services that  
            would prevent the need for further detention. The court shall  
            make that determination on a case-by-case basis and shall make  
            reference to the documentation provided by the probation  
            officer or other evidence relied upon in reaching its  
            decision.  (WIC Section 636(d).)

          7)Provides for victim restitution and a victim restitution fine  
            from minors found to have committed a crime by the juvenile  
            court.  (WIC Section 730.6.)

          8)Provides for the licensure and regulation of community care  
            facilities, including group homes, by the California  
            Department of Social Services (CDSS) and requires that  
            licensed facilities be subject to unannounced inspections  
            under specified circumstances. (Health and Safety Code  
            Sections 1500 et seq, and 1534.)

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill clarified that nothing in  
          the Student Success and Support Program (created by SB 1456  
          (Lowenthal), Chapter 624, Statutes of 2012) at the California  
          Community Colleges (CCC) is intended to preclude CCCs from  
          providing courses and programs including, but not limited to,  
          professional development of language skills; and job services  
          for individuals with disabilities to the extent resources are  








                                                                  AB 388
                                                                  Page  4

          available for those purposes.
           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to Senate Appropriations Committee,  
          significant ongoing costs potentially in the hundreds of  
          thousands of dollars (General Fund) to DSS to conduct additional  
          visits to specified facilities triggered by the law enforcement  
          notification threshold established in the bill.  Potentially  
          significant one-time and ongoing local costs (Local) to county  
          child welfare services departments and county probation  
          departments to add components to the existing protocol to  
          address the situation when a minor who is a dependent of the  
          court then appears to come within delinquency jurisdiction.   
          Negligible impact on the Restitution Fund, as the amount of  
          restitution received from juvenile offenders is negligible and  
          not regularly imposed.  Minor ongoing costs to the DHCS to  
          review certifications upon notification of adverse licensing  
          actions taken by DSS.  Potential future cost pressure on [group  
          home] rates (General Fund) to the extent the workgroup develops  
          performance standards and outcome measures requiring group homes  
          to implement programs and services to minimize law enforcement  
          contacts that results in increased costs to the [group homes],  
          leading to pressure to increase rates to provide these  
          additional programs and services.  Potential future ongoing cost  
          savings (General Fund/Local) in the criminal justice system to  
          the extent earlier intervention in these cases precludes minors  
          from transitioning from dependency to delinquency jurisdiction. 

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, older children and teens who  
          are in foster care due to parental abuse or neglect are often  
          placed in group homes and other residential facilities, because  
          of a shortage of foster homes for older children, or because  
          they have special needs or mental health issues.  The author  
          states that group homes are licensed to provide safe and  
          supportive care, and to address these children's traumatic  
          history and special needs. 

          The author additionally states that some group homes are overly  
          reliant on law enforcement to address behavioral issues with  
          youth leading to the youth's arrest for minor incidents that  
          would not trigger justice system involvement for youth who live  
          with their own parents (e.g. fights between two youth, yelling  
          at staff, breaking or throwing objects).  Once arrested, the  
          author states that many foster youth are needlessly detained in  
          juvenile halls and other locked facilities.

           








                                                                 AB 388
                                                                  Page  5

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Gabe Caswell / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744  



                                                               FN: 0004998