BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          AB 454 (Dickinson) - Workers' Compensation Benefits: Prevailing  
          Wages
          
          Amended: July 2, 2013           Policy Vote: L&IR 4-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: August 12, 2013                           
          Consultant: Robert Ingenito     
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.


          Bill Summary: AB 454 would require that if an employee is  
          employed on a project subject to a federal, state, city, or  
          local prevailing wage requirement, but is paid less than the  
          prevailing wage entitled to be paid, any disability benefits  
          (temporary or permanent) for injuries incurred on that job shall  
          be calculated using the applicable prevailing wage rate, instead  
          of the actual wages paid.

          Fiscal Impact: The Department of Industrial Relations indicates  
          that it would incur costs of $250,000 (special funds) to  
          implement the provisions of the bill.

          Background: DIR enforces prevailing wage law in the State.  
          Toward that end, DIR's Director makes public works coverage  
          determinations on request, issuing letter decisions stating  
          whether a given project or type of work is subject to prevailing  
          wages and often defends those decisions in court. 

          Current law requires the prevailing wage rate to be paid to  
          workers on public works projects over $1,000.  Statute defines  
          public works as construction, alteration, demolition,  
          installation, or repair work done under contract and paid for in  
          whole or in part out of public funds, except work done directly  
          by any public utility company, as specified.

          California's prevailing wage rate is the basic hourly rate paid  
          on public works projects to a majority of workers engaged in a  
          particular craft, classification or type of work within the  
          locality and in the nearest labor market area (if a majority of  
          such workers are paid at a single rate).  If there is no single  
          rate paid to a majority, the single or modal rate being paid to  








          AB 454 (Dickinson)
          Page 1


          the greater number of workers is prevailing.  The prevailing  
          wage is determined by DIR in written determinations issued  
          annually on February 22 and August 22.
          
          Current law requires California employers to provide workers'  
          compensation benefits to their employees. Employers must  
          purchase workers' compensation insurance from either a licensed  
          insurance company, or through the State Compensation Insurance  
          Fund (SCIF), or employers may choose to self-insure, which means  
          they use a pay-as-you-go model, paying benefits to and on behalf  
          of workers as the costs are incurred. 

          SCIF, created by the Legislature in 1914, is the insurer of last  
          resort in California's private insurance market and is now the  
          largest workers' compensation insurer in the country. However,  
          SCIF is not part of state government. It is a quasi-state agency  
          with a board of directors appointed by the governor and the  
          Legislature (11 total members, nine appointed by the governor  
          and two appointed by the Legislature).  SCIF is a non-profit,  
          independent organization funded by premiums paid by businesses  
          purchasing workers compensation insurance policies.

          Proposed Law: This bill would require that when temporary  
          disability benefits or permanent disability benefits are due to  
          an injured worker who earned less than the prevailing wage, but  
          the work performed was under a contract which was subject to a  
          federal, state, city, city and county, or county prevailing wage  
          requirement, the benefits shall be calculated using the  
          applicable prevailing wage, instead of the actual wages paid.

          Related Legislation: SB 377 (Lieu) would, among other things,  
          require DIR to issue a determination of whether a project is  
          deemed to be a "public work" within 60 days.  SB 377 is set to  
          be heard before the Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment.

          Staff Comments: An employee's wages are used to determine  
          temporary disability and permanent disability. When a worker is  
          unlawfully underpaid with respect to wages, such as with  
          prevailing wages, the worker and his or her representative is  
          forced to appear before the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board  
          (WCAB), frequently against the employer who underpaid the  
          worker's wages in the first place.

          This claim, under current law, is pursued through the Labor  








          AB 454 (Dickinson)
          Page 2


          Commissioner's office.  Once the Labor Commissioner has ruled,  
          this evidence can be presented to the WCAB, and if the worker  
          was inappropriately paid, his or her workers' compensation  
          benefit can be adjusted accordingly.  Getting a final ruling  
          from the Labor Commissioner's office can reportedly be lengthy.  
          AB 454 would allow WCAB to make a ruling on a worker's  
          eligibility for prevailing wages, and adjust the worker's  
          indemnity benefits accordingly.

          DIR's estimated costs of $250,000 to implement the current  
          version of the bill reflect (1) rulemaking requirements and (2)  
          increased workload requirements due to the expedited hearing  
          process, as provided.