Amended in Assembly January 16, 2014

Amended in Assembly January 6, 2014

Amended in Assembly September 11, 2013

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 646


Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley

February 21, 2013


An act to addbegin delete and repealend delete Chapter 1.3 (commencing with Section 10050)begin delete ofend deletebegin insert toend insert Part 7 of Division 1 of Title 1 ofbegin insert, and to add and repeal Section 10051 of,end insert the Education Code, relating to public education governance.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 646, as amended, Cooley. Public education governance: regional P-20 councils: advisory committee.

Existing law establishes a system of public elementary and secondary schools in this state, and authorizes local educational agencies throughout the state to operate schools and provide instruction to pupils in kindergarten and grades 1 to 12, inclusive (K-12). Existing law also establishes a system of public postsecondary education in the state that consists of 3 segments: the University of California, the California State University, and the California Community Colleges.

This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to affirm the employer-education partnership model of a regional P-20 council, as defined, as a desired structure in California to help align preschool, K-12, community college, 4-year college, and graduate and professional education programs and funding to advance strategic educational and economic outcomes.

begin delete

The

end delete

begin insertContingent upon the enactment of an appropriation for this purpose in the annual Budget Act or another statute, thisend insert bill would require the State Department of Education, in consultation with specified entities, including, but not limited to, the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development, to study best practices of state and regional P-20 councils in California and across the nation to identify key statewide policies and goals that P-20 councils may seek to further, and to report its findings and recommendations to the Legislature on or before July 1, 2015.begin insert These provisions would be repealed on July 1, 2020.end insert

begin delete

The provisions of the bill would be repealed on January 1, 2020.

end delete

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Chapter 1.3 (commencing with Section 10050)
2is added to Part 7 of Division 1 of Title 1 of the Education Code,
3to read:

4 

5Chapter  1.3. Regional P-20 Councils
6

 

7

10050.  

(a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the
8following:

9(1) The Federal Reserve has stated on its Internet Web site that
10“[m]ost policymakers estimate the longer-run normal rate of
11unemployment is between 5.2 and 6 percent.” The current rate of
12unemployment in the United States is 7.4 percent. The
13unemployment rates in both the County of Sacramento and
14California are higher than the national unemployment rate.
15According to a September 2013 brief by the California Budget
16Project, “[i]f California’s job market continues to grow as it has
17over the past year, the state will not recover the jobs lost due to
18the Great Recession until January 2016,” but that this also
19“understates how long it will actually take for the job market to
20reach pre-recession strength” due to California’s increased
21working-age population since 2007.

22(2) P-16 councils were first established in several states in the
231990s to convene state leaders representing early learning (the “P”
P3    1stands for preschool) through the first four years of college (the
2“16”). More recently, some states have extended the scope of these
3councils to include doctoral and professional schools (the “20”).

4(3) According to a 2008 report of the Education Commission
5of the States, 38 states had established a P-16 or P-20 council and
611 states had regional P-16 or P-20 councils.

7(4) It is increasingly recognized that regions are the units of
8economic competition and an essential ingredient of economic
9competitiveness is for regions to align educational assets to prepare
10students for critical careers within key economic clusters. The
11Sacramento region’s Next Economy initiative is one example of
12a regional economic development strategy advancing these
13objectives.

14(5) Recent research affirms that aligning regional assets is a key
15to advancing economic competitiveness; a Brookings Institution
16Metropolitan Policy Program study has noted that “[r]egional
17economies are differentiated, complex, and dynamic; improving
18their performance entails customized and integrated strategies.”
19An educated and suitably prepared workforce is a key element in
20private sector job creation and job-related capital investment.

21(6) Several examples of effective P-20 councils can be found
22in California, including the Alliance for Education in San
23Bernardino County, which is the Inland Empire’s premier
24partnership between the business and education communities. Its
25objective is “to achieve the goal of producing an educated and
26skilled workforce that ensures the economic well-being for San
27Bernardino County.”

28(7) Recent state policy and funding priorities are intended to
29promote the development and sustainability of pathways preparing
30students across the P-20 spectrum for critical careers in the 21st
31century economy.

32(8) During hearings of the Assembly Select Committee on
33Community and Neighborhood Development in July 2013,
34witnesses stated that California’s future economic growth would
35benefit from a concentrated effort aimed at establishing the
36preconditions that support growth in jobs and private sector
37investment in California communities. Such an approach would
38be analogous to the high degree of regional coordination that is
39typical for prioritizing and funding transportation improvements.
P4    1State and federal governments already require regional coordination
2among local governments to prioritize transportation funding.

3(9) California will benefit from a system of regional P-20
4councils, composed of both employers and educational leaders of
5educational entities that provide instruction for all levels from
6early childhood learning to doctoral and professional programs,
7to help align educational programs, policies, and funding to meet
8strategic educational and economic objectives.

9(b) Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature to affirm the
10employer-education partnership model of a regional P-20 council
11as a desired structure in California to help align preschool, K-12,
12community college, four-year college, and graduate and
13professional education programs and funding to advance strategic
14educational and economic outcomes.

15

10051.  

(a) begin deleteThe end deletebegin insertContingent upon the enactment of an
16appropriation for this purpose in the annual Budget Act or another
17statute, the end insert
department shall study best practices of state and
18regional P-20 councils in California and across the nation to
19identify key statewide policies and goals that P-20 councils may
20seek to further, and shall report its findings and recommendations
21to the Legislature on or before July 1, 2015. The department shall
22work in consultation with the Governor’s Office of Business and
23Economic Development, the office of the President of the
24University of California, the office of the Chancellor of the
25California State University, the office of the Chancellor of the
26California Community Colleges, the Employment Development
27Department, and the California Workforce Investment Board, as
28well as related state and regional interests.

29(b) (1) The report submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall
30be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government
31Code.

32(2) Pursuant to Section 10231.5 of the Government Code, this
33section is repealed on July 1, 2020.



O

    96