BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �







                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY
                            Senator Loni Hancock, Chair              A
                             2013-2014 Regular Session               B

                                                                     7
                                                                     3
                                                                     9
          AB 739 (Salas)                                              
          As Amended June 17, 2014
          Hearing date:  June 24, 2014
          Government Code
          JRD:sl

                                       CORONERS  

                                       HISTORY

          Source:Kern County Sheriff Donny Youngblood 

          Prior Legislation: None known

          Support: California State Sheriffs' Association; Kings County  
          Sheriff's Office

          Opposition:Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training

          Assembly Floor Vote:  Ayes 74 - Noes 0

                                             
                                        KEY ISSUE
           
          SHOULD VOLUNTEER AND PART-TIME PERSONNEL BE ALLOWED TO SERVE AS  
          RESERVE DEPUTY CORONERS, AS SPECIFIED? 


                                       PURPOSE

          The purpose of this legislation is to specify who is a coroner's  
          appointed deputy or authorized deputy for the purpose of  
          performing inquests, as specified.




                                                                     (More)






                                                             AB 739 (Salas)
                                                                     Page 2




           Existing law  specifies that coroners and deputy coroners, who  
          are regularly employed and paid in that capacity, are peace  
          officers whose authority extends to any place in the state for  
          the purpose of performing their primary duties or when making an  
          arrest, as specified.   Existing law  authorizes these peace  
          officers to carry firearms only if authorized and under terms  
          and conditions specified by their employing agency.  (Penal Code  
          � 830.35.)

           Existing law  specifies that whenever any qualified person is  
          deputized or appointed by the proper authority as a reserve or  
          auxiliary sheriff or city police officer, a reserve deputy  
          sheriff, a reserve deputy marshal, a reserve police officer of a  
          regional park district or of a transit district, a reserve park  
          ranger, a reserve harbor or port police officer of a county,  
          city, or district as specified in Section 663.5 of the Harbors  
          and Navigation Code, a reserve deputy of the Department of Fish  
          and Game, a reserve special agent of the Department of Justice,  
          a reserve officer of a community service district which is  
          authorized under subdivision (h) of Section 61600 of the  
          Government Code to maintain a police department or other police  
          protection, a reserve officer of a school district police  
          department under Section 35021.5 of the Education Code, a  
          reserve officer of a community college police department under  
          Section 72330, a reserve officer of a police protection district  
          formed under Part 1 (commencing with Section 20000) of Division  
          14 of the Health and Safety Code, or a reserve housing authority  
          patrol officer employed by a housing authority defined in  
          subdivision (d) of Section 830.31,  and is assigned specific  
          police functions by that authority, the person is a peace  
          officer, if the person qualifies as set forth in Section 832.6.   
          The authority of a person designated as a peace officer pursuant  
          to this paragraph extends only for the duration of the person's  
          specific assignment.   (Penal Code � 830.6)

           Existing law  states that every person deputized or appointed, as  
          described in Section 830.6, shall have the powers of a peace  
          officer only when the person is a level I reserve officer  




                                                                     (More)






                                                             AB 739 (Salas)
                                                                     Page 3



          deputized or appointed under 830.6 and assigned to the  
          prevention and detection of crime and the general enforcement of  
          the laws of this state, whether or not working alone, and the  
          person has completed the basic training course for deputy  
          sheriffs and police officers prescribed by the Commission on  
          Peace Officer Standards and Training.  For level I reserve  
          officers appointed prior to January 1, 1997, the basic training  
          requirement shall be the course that was prescribed at the time  
          of their appointment.  Reserve officers appointed pursuant to  
          this paragraph are required to satisfy the continuing  
          professional training requirement prescribed by the commission.   
          (Penal Code � 832.6)

           Existing law  requires the coroner to discharge the duties of a  
          sheriff in any action or proceeding in which the sheriff is a  
          party.  (Government Code � 27469.)

           Existing law  requires the coroner to inquire into and determine  
          the circumstances, manner, and cause of all violent, sudden, or  
          unusual deaths; unattended deaths; deaths where the deceased has  
          not been attended by either a physician or a registered nurse,  
          who is a member of a hospice care interdisciplinary team, as  
          defined, in the 20 days before death; deaths related to or  
          following known or suspected self-induced or criminal abortion;  
          known or suspected homicide, suicide, or accidental poisoning;  
          deaths known or suspected as resulting in whole or in part from  
          or related to accident or injury either old or recent; deaths  
          due to drowning, fire, hanging, gunshot, stabbing, cutting,  
          exposure, starvation, acute alcoholism, drug addiction,  
          strangulation, aspiration, or where the suspected cause of death  
          is sudden infant death syndrome; death in whole or in part  
          occasioned by criminal means; deaths associated with a known or  
          alleged rape or crime against nature; deaths in prison or while  
          under sentence; deaths known or suspected as due to contagious  
          disease and constituting a public hazard; deaths from  
          occupational diseases or occupational hazards; deaths of  
          patients in state mental hospitals serving the mentally disabled  
          and operated by the State Department of State Hospitals; deaths  
          of patients in state hospitals serving the developmentally  




                                                                     (More)






                                                             AB 739 (Salas)
                                                                     Page 4



          disabled and operated by the State Department of Developmental  
          Services; deaths under such circumstances as to afford a  
          reasonable ground to suspect that the death was caused by the  
          criminal act of another; and any deaths reported by physicians  
          or other persons having knowledge of death for inquiry by  
          coroner.  (Government Code � 27491.)

           Existing law  requires the coroner or a deputy coroner to  
          personally sign the certificate of death in any case in which  
          the coroner conducts an inquiry described in the above  
          provision, except if inquiry determines that the physician of  
          record has sufficient knowledge to reasonably state the cause of  
          a death occurring under natural circumstances, the coroner may  
          authorize that physician to sign the certificate of death.   
          (Government Code � 27491.)

           Existing law  requires the coroner, in all cases in which a  
          person has died under circumstances that afford a reasonable  
          ground to suspect that the person's death has been occasioned by  
          the act of another by criminal means, upon determining that  
          those reasonable grounds exist, to immediately notify, by the  
          most direct communication available, the law enforcement agency  
          having jurisdiction over the criminal investigation.   
          (Government Code � 27491.1.)

           Existing law  authorizes the coroner or the coroner's appointed  
          deputy, on being informed of a death and finding it to fall into  
          the classification of deaths requiring his or her inquiry, to  
          proceed immediately to where the body lies, examine the body,  
          make identification, make inquiry into the circumstances,  
          manner, and means of death, and, as circumstances warrant,  
          either order its removal for further investigation or  
          disposition or release the body to the next of kin.  (Government  
          Code � 27491.2(a).)

           Existing law  requires the coroner, or the coroner's appointed  
          deputy, on being notified of a death occurring while the  
          deceased was driving or riding in a motor vehicle, or as a  
          result of the deceased being struck by a motor vehicle, to take  




                                                                     (More)






                                                             AB 739 (Salas)
                                                                     Page 5



          blood and urine samples from the body of the deceased before it  
          has been prepared for burial and make appropriate related  
          chemical tests to determine the alcoholic contents, if any, of  
          the body.  Authorizes the coroner to perform other chemical  
          tests including, but not limited to, barbituric acid and  
          amphetamine derivative as deemed appropriate.  (Government Code  
          � 27491.25.)

           Existing law  authorizes the coroner, in any death into which the  
          coroner is to inquire, to take charge of any and all personal  
          effects, valuables, and property of the deceased at the scene of  
          a death or related to the inquiry and hold or safeguard them  
          until lawful disposition of the items can be made.  Authorizes  
          the coroner to lock the premises and apply a seal to the door or  
          doors prohibiting entrance to the premises, pending arrival of a  
          legally-authorized representative of the deceased.  (Government  
          Code � 27491.3.)

           This bill  states that for the purpose of performing inquests, a  
          coroner's appointed deputy or authorized deputy is meant to  
          include the following:

             a)   Any deputy coroner who is regularly employed and paid in  
               that capacity.

             b)   Any part-time or volunteer personnel of a  
               sheriff-coroner's office who are level 1 Reserve Officers,  
               as described in section 832.6(a)(1) of the penal code. 

           This bill  states that POST shall not reimburse any individual  
          agency for training or certification of any part-time or  
          volunteer personnel.

                    RECEIVERSHIP/OVERCROWDING CRISIS AGGRAVATION

          For the last several years, severe overcrowding in California's  
          prisons has been the focus of evolving and expensive litigation  
          relating to conditions of confinement.  On May 23, 2011, the  
          United States Supreme Court ordered California to reduce its  




                                                                     (More)






                                                             AB 739 (Salas)
                                                                     Page 6



          prison population to 137.5 percent of design capacity within two  
          years from the date of its ruling, subject to the right of the  
          state to seek modifications in appropriate circumstances.   

          Beginning in early 2007, Senate leadership initiated a policy to  
          hold legislative proposals which could further aggravate the  
          prison overcrowding crisis through new or expanded felony  
          prosecutions.  Under the resulting policy, known as "ROCA"  
          (which stands for "Receivership/ Overcrowding Crisis  
          Aggravation"), the Committee held measures that created a new  
          felony, expanded the scope or penalty of an existing felony, or  
          otherwise increased the application of a felony in a manner  
          which could exacerbate the prison overcrowding crisis.  Under  
          these principles, ROCA was applied as a content-neutral,  
          provisional measure necessary to ensure that the Legislature did  
          not erode progress towards reducing prison overcrowding by  
          passing legislation, which would increase the prison population.  
            

          In January of 2013, just over a year after the enactment of the  
          historic Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011, the State of  
          California filed court documents seeking to vacate or modify the  
          federal court order requiring the state to reduce its prison  
          population to 137.5 percent of design capacity.  The State  
          submitted that the, ". . .  population in the State's 33 prisons  
          has been reduced by over 24,000 inmates since October 2011 when  
          public safety realignment went into effect, by more than 36,000  
          inmates compared to the 2008 population . . . , and by nearly  
          42,000 inmates since 2006 . . . ."  Plaintiffs opposed the  
          state's motion, arguing that, "California prisons, which  
          currently average 150% of capacity, and reach as high as 185% of  
          capacity at one prison, continue to deliver health care that is  
          constitutionally deficient."  In an order dated January 29,  
          2013, the federal court granted the state a six-month extension  
          to achieve the 137.5 % inmate population cap by December 31,  
          2013.  

          The Three-Judge Court then ordered, on April 11, 2013, the state  
          of California to "immediately take all steps necessary to comply  




                                                                     (More)






                                                             AB 739 (Salas)
                                                                     Page 7



          with this Court's . . . Order . . . requiring defendants to  
          reduce overall prison population to 137.5% design capacity by  
          December 31, 2013."  On September 16, 2013, the State asked the  
          Court to extend that deadline to December 31, 2016.  In  
          response, the Court extended the deadline first to January 27,  
          2014 and then February 24, 2014, and ordered the parties to  
          enter into a meet-and-confer process to "explore how defendants  
          can comply with this Court's June 20, 2013 Order, including  
          means and dates by which such compliance can be expedited or  
          accomplished and how this Court can ensure a durable solution to  
          the prison crowding problem."

          The parties were not able to reach an agreement during the  
          meet-and-confer process.  As a result, the Court ordered  
          briefing on the State's requested extension and, on February 10,  
          2014, issued an order extending the deadline to reduce the  
          in-state adult institution population to 137.5% design capacity  
          to February 28, 2016.  The order requires the state to meet the  
          following interim and final population reduction benchmarks:

                 143% of design bed capacity by June 30, 2014;
                 141.5% of design bed capacity by February 28, 2015; and
                 137.5% of design bed capacity by February 28, 2016. 

          If a benchmark is missed the Compliance Officer (a position  
          created by the February 10, 2016 order) can order the release of  
          inmates to bring the State into compliance with that benchmark.   


          In a status report to the Court dated May 15, 2014, the state  
          reported that as of May 14, 2014, 116,428 inmates were housed in  
          the State's 34 adult institutions, which amounts to 140.8% of  
          design bed capacity, and 8,650 inmates were housed in  
          out-of-state facilities.   

          The ongoing prison overcrowding litigation indicates that prison  
          capacity and related issues concerning conditions of confinement  
          remain unresolved.  While real gains in reducing the prison  
          population have been made, even greater reductions may be  




                                                                     (More)






                                                             AB 739 (Salas)
                                                                     Page 8



          required to meet the orders of the federal court.  Therefore,  
          the Committee's consideration of ROCA bills -bills that may  
          impact the prison population - will be informed by the following  
          questions:

                 Whether a measure erodes realignment and impacts the  
               prison population;
                 Whether a measure addresses a crime which is directly  
               dangerous to the physical safety of others for which there  
               is no other reasonably appropriate sanction; 
                 Whether a bill corrects a constitutional infirmity or  
               legislative drafting error; 
                 Whether a measure proposes penalties which are  
               proportionate, and cannot be achieved through any other  
               reasonably appropriate remedy; and,
                 Whether a bill addresses a major area of public safety  
               or criminal activity for which there is no other  
               reasonable, appropriate remedy.

























                                                                     (More)











                                      COMMENTS
           
           1.   Need for Legislation

           According to the author: 

            In large, rural counties like Kern, it can take hours for  
            staff to arrive at an accident scene, which results in  
            extraordinary costs for local law enforcement.  The use of  
            part-time or volunteer personnel with the appropriate training  
            and credentials would allow for greater efficiencies without  
            jeopardizing public safety.

            AB 739 will provide for volunteer and/or part time personnel  
            to serve as reserve deputy coroners.  These employees would be  
            required to abide by the established eligibility and training  
            standards (including PC 832 certification), currently required  
            of full time coroner personnel.  This language is permissive  
            and intended to help sheriffs in counties, like Kern, respond  
            to incidents in remote areas in a more time and cost effective  
            manner.  

          2.   Effect of Legislation

           In holding that deputy coroners are not "active law  
          enforcement," the Court of Appeal discussed the essential duties  
          that deputy coroners are tasked to perform.  (Riverside  
          Sheriffs'Association v. Board of Administration, California  
          Public Employees' Retirement System (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 1.)   
          As stated by the court:

            Deputy coroners conduct investigations into the causes of  
            death, as opposed to investigating crimes. While most  
            death scenes do not involve criminal conduct, some do,  
            and in such cases, the coroner's investigation supports  
            and parallels that of the appropriate law enforcement  
            agency. A deputy coroner's duties include: receiving  
            reports of death from physicians, law enforcement and  
            hospital personnel; initiating investigations at death  




                                                                     (More)






                                                             AB 739 (Salas)
                                                                     Page 10



            scenes to determine if death is due to homicide, suicide,  
            accident or nontraumatic causes; securing scientific and  
            pathological evidence such as clothing, weapons, drugs,  
            body fluids; fingerprinting and attempting to identify  
            the decedent; locating and notifying relatives of the  
            decedent; speaking with physicians about the decedent's  
            medical history and checking other medical records to  
            determine the cause of death; ordering autopsies or other  
            services from skilled technicians to aid in arriving at  
            an exact cause of death; testifying in court; and  
            preparing and signing death certificates. A deputy  
            coroner's determination about the cause of death may  
            initiate a criminal investigation.  (Id. at 6-7.)
          
          According to the California State Sheriffs' Association, "In  
          large, rural counties it can take hours for staff to arrive at  
          an accident scene, which results in extraordinary costs for  
          local law enforcement."   This legislation seeks to remedy this  
          issue by allowing any part-time or volunteer personnel of the  
          coroner's office, who meet the same background, training, and  
          certification requirements established by POST for deputy  
          coroners regularly-employed by the Sheriff's Department, to  
          respond to scenes and perform the appropriate inquiry.  


                                   ***************