BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          AB 777 (Muratsuchi) - Taxes: Exemption: Space Flight Property
          
          Amended: February 19, 2014      Policy Vote: G&F 7-0
          Urgency: Yes                    Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: April 7, 2014                             
          Consultant: Robert Ingenito     
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.


          Bill Summary: AB 777 would exempt qualified property for use in  
          space flight, as defined, from property tax.

          Fiscal Impact: Currently, one county assessor is assessing tax  
          on space flight materials, and subsequent appeals and related  
          activity are pending. Consequently, under current law and  
          regulations, this bill is estimated to result in a reduction of  
          local property tax revenue of roughly $1 million annually. Under  
          Proposition 98, this reduction in local property tax revenues  
          would lead to an increase in state General Fund support for K-14  
          education of approximately 40 to 50 percent, or potentially  
          $500,000 annually. The exact amount would depend on the specific  
          factors which determine the annual Proposition 98 minimum  
          funding guarantee. 

          Background: The California Constitution, Article XIII, Section 1  
          states that all property is taxable unless otherwise exempted by  
          the Constitution or federal law. The Constitution limits the  
          maximum amount of any ad valorem tax on real property at 1  
          percent of full cash value, and precludes reassessment unless  
          the property is newly constructed or changes ownership. However,  
          county assessors value personal property annually.

          The Constitution specifically allows the Legislature to exempt  
          personal property from the property tax by two-thirds vote. In  
          1980, the Legislature exempted all business inventories from the  
          property tax, defined as items generally held for sale or lease  
          in the ordinary course of business.

          The Board of Equalization (BOE) was created to ensure consistent  
          tax rates and assessment practices among county assessors.  
          Consistent with its oversight role, BOE enacts rules and  








          AB 777 (Muratsuchi)
          Page 1


          regulations which generally bind county assessors; however,  
          assessors can disagree with BOE.  Assessors believing that BOE's  
          interpretation is invalid, may bring a so-called "538 action"  
          against BOE in court for declaratory relief instead of applying  
          BOE's rule or regulation.  Because BOE rules clarify current  
          law, they generally apply retroactively to any fiscal year  
          within the statute of limitations.

          Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (SpaceX) constructs  
          rockets that deliver satellites into space as well as spacecraft  
          that carry cargo to the International Space Station. In 2012,  
          the Los Angeles County Assessor audited SpaceX, and noted space  
          flight property in a site visit that wasn't listed on the form  
          taxpayers use to self-report personal property to the Assessor.   
          In February 2013, Los Angeles County issued SpaceX an assessment  
          for that property for all years within the statute of  
          limitations, back to the 2007-08 fiscal year. SpaceX appealed  
          the assessment to the Los Angeles County Assessment Appeals  
          Board; the appeal hearing has not yet been scheduled. 

          In December 2013, BOE issued an advisory, non-binding opinion  
          concluding that SpaceX's equipment qualifies for the business  
          inventory property tax exemption.  Additionally, in February  
          2014, BOE initiated a discussion of proposed revisions to Rule  
          133 to add specified space flight property to its list of items  
          explicitly defined as exempt business inventory.
            
          Proposed Law: This bill would exempt from the property tax  
          tangible personal property that has space flight capacity.  
          Property exempted by the bill includes raw materials, works in  
          progress, finished goods, and includes orbital space facilities,  
          space propulsion systems, space vehicles, launch vehicles,  
          satellites, or space stations of any kind.  Fuel sold and used  
          exclusively in space flight is also exempt if it is not  
          adaptable for use in ordinary motor vehicles.  The property need  
          not be returned to Earth to qualify for the exemption.

          The exemption applies to lien dates between January 1, 2014 and  
          January 1, 2024, and sunsets on July 1, 2025.  

          Staff Comments: As noted above, disagreement currently exists  
          regarding whether propulsion systems (rockets used for space  
          flight transportation) that are consumed as part of delivery are  
          either taxable business supplies or tax-exempt business  








          AB 777 (Muratsuchi)
          Page 2


          inventories. Also as noted above, BOE has issued a legal opinion  
          concluding that space materials are business inventory and thus  
          exempt from property tax, and has begun the process to revise  
          the related rule toward the same end. Consequently, the  
          determination of the revenue impact resulting from this bill  
          could depend on the baseline revenue scenario selected to which  
          this measure compares. Using a methodology that assumes the BOE  
          pending rule change has already occurred, this measure would  
          have no revenue impact.