AB 815,
as amended, begin deleteChávezend delete begin insertConwayend insert. begin deleteCareer technical education: linked learning programs. end deletebegin insertSchool intervention: parent empowerment.end insert
Existing law requires a local educational agency to implement one of several specified interventions for a school not identified as a persistently lowest-achieving school that, after one full school year, is subject to corrective action, as specified, and fails to meet specified criteria and has a specified percentage of parents and legal guardians of pupils sign a petition requesting the local educational agency to implement at least one of 5 specified interventions. Existing law requires a local educational agency to implement the intervention option requested by the petition unless the agency makes a specified finding in a regularly scheduled public hearing.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would delete the provision excluding schools identified as persistently lowest-achieving schools, and would also make the provisions applicable to schools ranked in deciles 1 to 3, inclusive, of the Academic Performance Index. The bill would make technical changes by updating cross-references. By imposing additional duties on school districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
end insertbegin insertThe California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
end insertExisting law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to submit a report to the Legislature and the Governor no later than December 1, 2009, that explores the feasibility of expanding and establishing linked learning programs, as defined, in California.
end deleteThis bill would make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
end deleteVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
State-mandated local program: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertSection 53300 of the end insertbegin insertEducation Codeend insertbegin insert is amended to read:end insert
For any schoolbegin delete not identified as a persistently lowest-achieving school under Section 53201 which,end deletebegin insert that,end insert after one full school year, is subject to corrective action pursuant tobegin delete paragraph (7) ofend delete Sectionbegin delete 1116(b)end deletebegin insert 6316(b)(7)end insert of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301 et seq.) and continues to fail to make adequate yearly progress, and has an Academic
Performance Indexbegin insert
(API)end insert score of less than 800,begin insert or any school ranked in any of deciles 1 to 3, inclusive, of the APIend insert and where at least one-half of the parents or legal guardians of pupils attending the school, or a combination of at least one-half of the parents or legal guardians of pupils attending the school and the elementary or middle schools that normally matriculate into a middle or high school, as applicable, sign a petition requesting the local educational agency to implement one or more of the four interventions identified pursuant to paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive of subdivision (a) of Section 53202 or the federally mandated alternative governance arrangement pursuant to Sectionbegin delete 1116(b)(8)(B)(v)end deletebegin insert
6316(b)(8)(B)(v)end insert
of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301 et seq.), the local educational agency shall implement the option requested by the parents unless, in a regularly scheduled public hearing, the local educational agency makes a finding in writing stating the reason it cannot implement the specific recommended option and instead designates in writing which of the other options described in this section it will implement in the subsequent school year consistent with requirements specified in federal regulations and guidelines for schools subject to restructuring under Sectionbegin delete 1116(b)(8)end deletebegin insert 6316(b)(8)end insert of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301 et seq.) and regulations and guidelines for the four interventions.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
12this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
13local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
14pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
154 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
Section 52372.5 of the Education Code is
17amended to read:
(a) For purposes of this section, a “linked learning
19program” is a program that is all of the following:
20(1) A multiyear, comprehensive high school program of
21integrated academic and technical study that is organized around
22a broad theme, interest area, or industry sector, including, but not
23necessarily limited to, the industry sectors identified in the model
24standards adopted by the state board pursuant to Section 51226.
25(2) A program that ensures that all pupils have curriculum
26choices that will prepare them for career entry and a full range of
27postsecondary options, including two- and four-year college,
28apprenticeship, and formal employment training.
29(3) A program that is comprised, at a minimum, of the following
30components:
31(A) An integrated core curriculum that meets the eligibility
32requirements for admission to the University of California and the
33California State University and is delivered through project-based
34learning and other engaging instructional strategies that
35intentionally bring real-world context and relevance to the
36curriculum where broad themes, interest areas, and career technical
37education are emphasized.
38(B) An integrated technical core of a sequence of at least four
39related courses, that may reflect career technical education
40standards-based courses, that provide pupils with career skills, that
P4 1are aligned to and underscore academic principles, and to the extent
2possible fulfill the academic core requirements listed in
3subparagraph (A).
4(C) A series of work-based learning opportunities that begin
5with mentoring and job shadowing and evolve into intensive
6internships, school-based enterprises, or virtual apprenticeships.
7(D) Support services, including supplemental instruction in
8reading and mathematics, that help pupils master the advanced
9academic and technical content that is necessary for success in
10college and career.
11(b) The Superintendent, in conjunction with the Office of the
12Secretary for Education, the California Community Colleges, the
13University of California, the California State University, the
14Employment Development Department, both houses of the
15California Legislature, teachers, chamber organizations, industry
16representatives, research centers, parents, school administrators,
17representatives of regional occupational centers and programs,
18
community-based organizations, labor organizations, and others
19deemed appropriate by the Superintendent, shall develop a report
20that explores the feasibility of establishing and expanding
21additional linked learning programs in California, including the
22costs and merits associated with expansion of these programs.
23Linked learning programs created for high schools may include,
24but are not limited to, California partnership academies, regional
25occupational centers and programs, charter schools, academies,
26small learning communities, and other career-themed small schools.
27(c) The report described in subdivision (b) shall do all of the
28following:
29(1) Identify regulations, policies, and practices that need to be
30added, deleted, or amended in order to promote the development
31and expansion of linked learning programs.
32(2) Set forth a reasonable timeline for the development and
33expansion of linked learning programs.
34(3) Include all of the following components, at a minimum:
35(A) Assessment of the current capacity of the department for
36the purpose of maximizing the development of these programs.
37(B) Identification of the possible roles and responsibilities of
38other departments or agencies to assist in developing or
expanding
39linked learning programs.
P5 1(C) An assessment of the appropriateness of school districts
2fulfilling the requirements set forth in subdivisions (a) and (b) of
3Section 51228 by developing industry-focused linked learning
4programs, including those described in this section.
5(D) Methods for developing and sharing models of integrated
6curriculum and instruction.
7(E) Strategies for increasing the course options and instructional
8time for pupils in high school.
9(F) Plans for increasing opportunities for high-quality learning
10based on real-world applications in industry and careers.
11(G) Methods for improving alignment of curriculum between
12middle schools and high schools with career
instruction,
13exploration, and counseling for middle school pupils.
14(H) Methods for improving coordination and articulation
15between high schools and postsecondary institutions, including,
16but not limited to, California Community Colleges, the California
17State University, and the University of California.
18(I) Recommendations for increasing the supply of teachers who
19can teach effectively in a linked learning setting that aims to
20prepare pupils for a full range of postsecondary options. Necessary
21specialized skills include, but are not limited to, the abilities to
22design interdisciplinary projects and use project-based learning as
23an instructional strategy, work with other teachers in a
24team-teaching arrangement, develop curriculum that effectively
25integrates academic and technical content, design and utilize
26high-quality work-based learning to reinforce lessons in both
27academic and
technical courses, and develop authentic pupil
28assessments.
29(J) Recommendations for increasing the supply of schoolsite
30and district administrators who can effectively create and manage
31schools that are implementing one or more industry-focused linked
32learning programs. Necessary specialized skills include, but are
33not limited to, the abilities to develop and sustain partnerships with
34industry partners, recruit and retain uniquely qualified teachers,
35guide development of integrated curriculum, understand needs for
36and provide teacher professional development, guide development
37of comprehensive guidance systems that integrate college advising
38and career counseling, guide development of a coordinated and
39sequenced work-based learning component, and utilize data to
40assess pupil readiness for college and career.
P6 1(K) Recommendations for supporting regional coalitions in
2planning and
developing programs.
3(L) Evaluation of current linked learning programs, including
4partnership academies, regional occupational centers or programs,
5and postsecondary linked learning programs, including middle
6colleges and early college models.
7(M) Recommendations for increasing and improving in-school
8support services.
9(N) Recommendations for incorporating new measures into the
10state’s accountability system to better assess the results of these
11linked learning programs.
12(O) Assessment of the budgetary implications of offering all
13pupils access to these linked learning programs.
14(d) For purposes of completing the report described in
15subdivision (b), the Superintendent is authorized to use existing
16state resources and federal funds. If state or federal funds are not
17available or sufficient, the Superintendent may apply for and accept
18grants and receive donations, and other financial support from
19public or private sources for purposes of this section.
20(e) In developing the report, the Superintendent may accept
21support including, but not necessarily limited to, financial and
22technical support, from high school reform advocates, teachers,
23chamber organizations, industry representatives, research centers,
24parents, and pupils.
25(f) The Superintendent shall report to the Legislature as to the
26status of completing the report and any preliminary
27recommendations no later than July 1, 2009.
28(g) The Superintendent shall submit a final report with
29recommendations to the Legislature and the Governor no later than
30December 1, 2009.
O
98