BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1162
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 1, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                    AB 1162 (Frazier) - As Amended:  May 1, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              Higher  
          EducationVote:9-3

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the Trustees of the California State  
          University (CSU) and Board of Governor's the California  
          Community Colleges (CCC), and requests the Regents of the  
          University of California (UC) and the governing bodies of  
          accredited private non-profit and for-profit postsecondary  
          institutions, to adopt policies for negotiating contracts  
          between their respective campuses and banks and other financial  
          institutions to disburse students' financial aid awards onto a  
          debit card, prepaid card, or preloaded card. 

          In adopting these policies, the bill encourages the institutions  
          to consider whether to include specified provisions, such as  
          providing students an unbiased choice of where to bank,  
          prohibiting certain types of fees, providing sufficient numbers  
          of fee-free ATMs, and providing the same level of consumer  
          protections as provided under federal law for debit cards linked  
          to traditional bank accounts.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Costs would be absorbable for the public postsecondary segments  
          to adopt the policies, including their consideration the  
          specified parameters. To the extent the inclusion of some of the  
          suggested contract provisions reduced the number of vendors  
          interested in providing debit card services, colleges' and  
          universities' cost for these services could increase. It is  
          presumed that the governing boards' policies will provide  
          sufficient flexibility to allow campuses to obtain theses  
          services in the most competitive manner possible.









                                                                  AB 1162
                                                                  Page  2

           COMMENTS  

           1)Background and Purpose  . When students receive financial aid,  
            whether as a scholarship, grant, or student loan, schools  
            apply that money to college costs then disburse the rest to  
            the student. Instead of disbursing aid refunds by check, many  
            campuses are funding financial aid awards through special  
            debit cards that sometimes double as student identification  
            cards.  

             According to the author, colleges and universities are  
            outsourcing their student financial aid distribution to banks  
            and financial firms in order to reduce costs. These banks and  
            financial firms then issue debit cards to the students so they  
            can access their financial aid. The federal government  
            requires that schools disburse financial aid refunds to  
            students free of charge, however, these debit cards carry fees  
            for other services that can take away from students' aid. As a  
            result students end up bearing some costs directly, including  
            per-swipe fees, inactivity fees, overdraft fees, ATM fees and  
            more. The author contends that other issues include aggressive  
            marketing strategies by partnering companies and weaker  
            consumer protections on certain cards.

           2)Opposition  . The California Bankers Association argues that  
            enactment of policies as contemplated in the bill could be an  
            infringement on a bank's freedom to price for services  
            rendered.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081