BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1164
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1164 (Lowenthal)
          As Amended January 23, 2014
          Majority vote 

           JUDICIARY           6-3         LABOR & EMPLOYMENT           4-2
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Wieckowski, Alejo, Chau,  |Ayes:|Roger Hern�ndez, Chau,    |
          |     |Dickinson, Muratsuchi,    |     |Gomez, Holden             |
          |     |Stone                     |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Wagner, Gorell,           |     |                          |
          |     |Maienschein               |Nays:|Morrell, Gorell           |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           APPROPRIATIONS      12-4                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Gatto, Bocanegra,         |     |                          |
          |     |Bradford,                 |     |                          |
          |     |Ian Calderon, Campos,     |     |                          |
          |     |Eggman, Gomez, Holden,    |     |                          |
          |     |Pan, Quirk,               |     |                          |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Weber      |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Bigelow, Allen, Linder,   |     |                          |
          |     |Wagner                    |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes an employee to record and enforce a wage  
          lien upon an employer's property, as specified.  Specifically,  
           this bill  :  

          1)Provides that an employee shall have a lien for the full  
            amount of any wages, other compensation, and related penalties  
            and damages owed to the employee on the following property:

             a)   All property of the employer, except that if the  
               employer is a natural person, a lien shall apply to the  
               employer's personal residence only to the extent that the  








                                                                  AB 1164
                                                                  Page  2


               employee provided labor to the benefit of that household or  
               residence.

             b)   The property upon which the employee bestowed labor for  
               the benefit of the property owner, except as specified. 

          2)Provides that the wage lien shall be permanently extinguished  
            unless a notice of lien is recorded and served within 180 days  
            of the date that the employee ceased working for the employer.  
             Requires the employee to commence action to enforce the lien  
            within 90 days of filing or recording notice of the lien. 

          3)Requires, with regard to a lien on real property, the employee  
            to record notice of the lien with the county recorder in the  
            county in which the property is located, and further requires  
            the lien to be executed under penalty of perjury and include  
            specified information. 

          4)Requires, with regard to a lien on personal property, the  
            employee to file a notice of lien with the Secretary of State  
            (SOS), as specified, and further requires the notice to be  
            executed under penalty of perjury and include specified  
            information.  Delays implementation of this provision until  
            the SOS system is operational, but not later than July 1,  
            2016. 

          5)Specifies that in order to enforce a lien authorized by this  
            bill, the employee shall demonstrate in a civil action or in  
            an administrative proceeding before the Labor Commissioner,  
            that he or she is owed wages, compensation, or penalties and  
            damages. 

          6)Provides that the employee is entitled to court costs and  
            reasonable attorneys' fees for filing a successful action to  
            enforce the lien. 

          7)Authorizes an award of attorney's fees to a property owner if  
            the court determines that an employee's claim contained false  
            information with an intent to defraud. 

          8)Authorizes a court to provide for the recovery of employer's  
            attorney's fees if the employee fails to file a release of the  
            lien. 









                                                                  AB 1164
                                                                  Page  3


          9)Specifies that a wage lien shall not attach to the extent that  
            the employer has a surety bond or insurance to cover the  
            employee's claim. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:

          1)The Department of Industrial Relations' Division of Labor  
            Standards Enforcement (DLSE) has processed more than 33,000  
            wage claims annually in recent years.  The number of such  
            cases that will involve wage liens is unknown.  The department  
            estimates ongoing special fund costs (Labor Enforcement and  
            Compliance Fund) of about $1.6 million for 16 additional  
            positions related to increased workload involving:

             a)   Determining whether specific property on which an  
               employee bestowed labor implicates rights of property  
               owners, other than employers, who would have to be an  
               additional party in an administrative proceeding involving  
               the Labor Commissioner. 

             b)   Additional prehearing investigation of wage claims to  
               confirm the appropriateness of a lien's contents, including  
               whether an employee claimant is likely not eligible to  
               obtain a lien for being exempt from the protections of  
               Industrial Welfare Commission wage orders, and performing  
               actions necessary to record the lien with either the  
               recorder's office or the SOS.

             c)   Performing additional administrative functions,  
               including preparing the lien form, providing notices to  
               parties, and service of documents.

            The Department of Industrial Relations also may incur one-time  
            costs should a rulemaking or regulations be required to  
            implement the bill's provisions.  The above costs could be  
            partially offset to the extent authorization for wage liens  
            has a deterrent impact on incidents of wage theft, which  
            reduces the DLSE's base workload.

          2)The SOS will incur minor one-time costs to incorporate the  
            lien filing requirement into the new business filing system  
            and minor ongoing costs, offset to some extent by fees,  
            associated with filing the liens. 








                                                                  AB 1164
                                                                  Page  4



          3)Unknown, potentially significant court costs associated with  
            additional proceedings regarding wage claims.
           COMMENTS  :  Under existing law, when an employer fails to pay  
          wages due, the employee has the right to file a claim against  
          his or her employer (or former employer) with the DLSE, which is  
          directed by the State Labor Commissioner.  The Labor  
          Commissioner has jurisdiction over most private sector  
          employees, except those that are bona fide independent  
          contractors.  After conducting an investigation, the Labor  
          Commissioner may hold an administrative conference or hearing,  
          or both.  If a party is unhappy with the Labor Commissioner's  
          decision, it may appeal to the appropriate civil court.   
          However, the author contends that even where a worker wins a  
          favorable decision, the process of collecting the award is often  
          difficult and ineffective.  Giving employees a "wage lien"  
          would, the author contends, provide an additional and arguably  
          more effective tool for an employee to recover unpaid wages. 

          This bill would, subject to certain exemptions, permit a worker  
          who has not been paid his or her wages to file a lien against  
          the employer's real or personal property, or a property upon  
          which the employee bestowed labor, for the amount of wages or  
          other compensation owed.  The bill also sets forth procedures  
          and timelines for filing, enforcing, and extinguishing liens.   
          The wage lien bears some resemblance - both in form and intent -  
          to the more familiar "mechanics lien," the general right to  
          which is guaranteed by the California Constitution.  As this  
          state constitutional right has been implemented in statutes,  
          however, the mechanic's lien is usually only available to  
          workers on construction projects and a few others specifically  
          provided for in statute. 

          This bill is supported by labor and employee rights  
          organizations who argue that the wage liens provided by this  
          bill will give employees a more effective tool for collecting  
          unpaid wages from irresponsible employers than is the case under  
          existing law.

          Several business associations and employer groups oppose this  
          bill, arguing that employees should not be allowed to interfere  
          with an employer's business or property by filing liens without  
          first having to prove the merit of their allegations. 
           








                                                                 AB 1164
                                                                  Page  5



          Analysis Prepared by  :    Thomas Clark / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 


                                                                FN: 0002998