BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1271
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1271 (Bonta and Jones-Sawyer)
          As Amended  January 23, 2014
          Majority vote 

           HIGHER EDUCATION    12-1        APPROPRIATIONS      16-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Williams, Ch�vez, Bloom,  |Ayes:|Gatto, Bigelow, Allen,    |
          |     |Fong, Jones-Sawyer,       |     |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian  |
          |     |Levine, Linder,           |     |Calderon, Campos, Eggman, |
          |     |Dickinson, Olsen,         |     |Gomez, Holden, Linder,    |
          |     |Quirk-Silva, Weber, Wilk  |     |Pan, Quirk,               |
          |     |                          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Wagner,    |
          |     |                          |     |Weber                     |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Fox                       |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Allows California Community Colleges (CCC) to receive  
          full funding for courses offered in correctional institutions.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Waives open course provisions for CCC courses offered in state  
            correctional facilities.

          2)Provides that attendance hours generated by CCC credit  
            instruction in state, city, county or federal correctional  
            facilities shall be funded at the credit rate, hours generated  
            by non-credit instruction be funded at the non-credit rate,  
            and hours generated by instruction in career development and  
            college preparation funded at the established rate. 

          3)Prohibits CCC from receiving state funding for attendance  
            hours generated in any inmate education class for which the  
            CCC receives full compensation from another agency or private  
            source, and requires the offset of state aid for partial  
            compensation received from any such source.  

          4)Prohibits use of state funding for CCC inmate education to  
            supplant costs incurred by the California Department of  
            Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). 









                                                                  AB 1271
                                                                  Page  2


           EXISTING LAW  prohibits CCCs from claiming state funding for  
          classes that are not open to the public; however an exemption is  
          allowed for inmate education in city, county and federal  
          correctional facilities.  Such courses are funded at non-credit  
          rates.  Under the exemption, funding is not allowed for CCC  
          classes in state correctional facilities.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:

          1)Ongoing General Fund (GF) (Proposition 98) cost pressure for  
            converting qualified existing courses to the full credit rate  
            at local and federal institutions.  Currently, credit funding  
            per full time equivalent student (FTES) is $4,636, career  
            development and college preparation course funding is $3,283,  
            and non-credit funding is $2,788.  According to the CCC  
            Chancellor's Office, in 2006-07 (most recent data available)  
            districts provided credit courses for 1,769 FTES in local and  
            federal correctional facilities.  The majority (1,588 FTES)  
            already received full credit funding as distance education  
            courses open to the public.  Under this bill, the remaining  
            FTES (181) would have received full credit apportionment at a  
            cost of $335,000. 

          2)In addition to the above costs for existing courses, the  
            higher funding rates could result in increased course  
            offerings at local and federal facilities, with resulting  
            state costs.  Additional costs would depend on the number of  
            FTES taking classes in state correctional facilities. For  
            every 100 for-credit FTES, annual GF (Proposition 98) costs  
            would increase by $464,000.  Community colleges are limited to  
            enrollment caps that arguably would make this a zero sum  
            change, but not all colleges are at their caps, thus expanding  
            access and funding rates creates enrollment and funding  
            pressure.

          3)To the extent this bill leads to increased education  
            programming for inmates, the state and local governments could  
            realize unquantifiable savings associated with decreased  
            recidivism.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, CDCR data from 2006 showed  
          28,000 paroled felons returned to prison within one year after  
          release.  The UCLA School of Public Policy and Social Research  








                                                                  AB 1271
                                                                  Page  3


          suggest that recidivism may be reduced by 10% to 20% with  
          educational programs at correctional facilities.  Inmates who  
          participate in education programs are two times more likely to  
          be employed after release than those who do not.  This can  
          enhance local entities ability to assist parolees in  
          reintegrating into the community, as required under realignment,  
          by releasing inmates to county supervision having obtained  
          skills necessary for employment.  

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916)  
          319-3960 


                                                                FN: 0002983