BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1324
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 1324 (Skinner)
          As Amended  August 7, 2014
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |     |(May 16, 2013)  |SENATE: |22-12|(August 21,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2014)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
               (vote not relevant)

          Original Committee Reference:    TRANS.  

           SUMMARY :  Allows the City of El Cerrito to adopt an ordinance to  
          impose a transactions and use tax not to exceed 0.5% for general  
          purposes that would, in combination with other taxes, exceed the  
          statutory limit of 2%.  

           The Senate amendments  delete the Assembly version of this bill,  
          and instead:

          1)Allow the City of El Cerrito to impose a transactions and use  
            tax for general purposes at a rate of no more than 0.5% that  
            would, in combination with all other transaction and use  
            taxes, exceed the 2% limit established in existing law, if all  
            the following conditions are met:

             a)   The city adopts an ordinance proposing the transactions  
               and use tax by any applicable voting requirements;

             b)   The ordinance proposing the transactions and use tax is  
               approved by the voters voting on the ordinance in  
               accordance with California Constitution Article XIII C, and  
               the election on the ordinance proposing the tax may occur  
               on or after November 4, 2014; 

             c)   The transactions and use tax is imposed on or after  
               January 1, 2015; and,

             d)   The transactions and use tax conforms to the  
               Transactions and Use Tax Law, as specified.

          2)Provide, if the ordinance proposing the transactions and use  
            tax is not approved, that the provisions of the bill shall be  
            repealed as of January 1, 2022.  








                                                                  AB 1324
                                                                  Page  2


          3)Find and declare that a special law is necessary because of  
            the unique fiscal and public service pressures experienced in  
            the City of El Cerrito.  

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill authorized Alameda County  
          to increase the fee on vehicle registration to be used to fund  
          the prevention of vehicle theft crimes.

            FISCAL EFFECT  :  None

           COMMENTS  :  

          1)Purpose of this bill.  This bill provides an exemption to the  
            City of El Cerrito from the 2% transactions and use tax  
            combined rate cap that is currently in statute.  This bill  
            authorizes the City of El Cerrito to each adopt an ordinance  
            to propose the imposition of a transactions and use tax for  
            general purposes at a rate of no more than 0.5%, and with the  
            appropriate voter approval pursuant to the California  
            Constitution, which requires a majority vote for transaction  
            and use taxes for general purposes.  If the ordinance  
            proposing the transactions and use tax is not approved by  
            voters by January 1, 2022, the provisions of the bill would be  
            repealed as of that same date.  This bill is author-sponsored.  
             

          2)Author's statement.  According to the author, "The City of El  
            Cerrito was hit particularly hard by the recession and the  
            local economy is still struggling to recover.  As a result,  
            local property values have declined.  The sluggish economy,  
            diminished revenues from reduced property assessments, the  
            loss of redevelopment, store relocations, and other factors  
            are forcing the city to reduce services."  

          3)Background and prior legislation.  Prior to 2003, cities  
            lacked the ability to place transactions and use taxes before  
            their voters without first obtaining approval by the  
            Legislature to bring an ordinance before the city council,  
            and, if approved at the council level, to the voters.  This  
            was remedied by SB 566 (Scott), Chapter 709, Statutes of 2003.  
             SB 566 also contained provisions to increase a county's  
            transactions and use tax cap to 2% because of the possibility  
            that certain counties were going to run out of room under  
            their caps if cities within those counties approved  








                                                                  AB 1324
                                                                  Page  3

            transactions and use taxes.  

            The Legislature has previously granted exemptions to the 2%  
            statutory cap for transactions and use taxes to support  
            countywide transportation programs.  AB 1086 (Wieckowski),  
            Chapter 327, Statutes of 2011, allowed a one-time exemption  
            for Alameda County from the 2% transactions and use tax  
            combined rate cap.  AB 210 (Wieckowski), Chapter 194, Statutes  
            of 2013, extended the authority for Alameda County to adopt an  
            ordinance imposing a transactions and use tax from January 1,  
            2014, to December 31, 2020, and allowed Contra Costa County to  
            adopt an ordinance imposing a transactions and use tax in the  
            same manner as Alameda County.  

          4)Policy consideration.  The Legislature may wish to consider if  
            the financial difficulties experienced by the City of El  
            Cerrito are different than those experienced by other cities  
            in California.  In light of that consideration, the  
            Legislature may wish to discuss if the 2% transactions and use  
            tax combined rate cap needs to be raised statewide, instead of  
            having cities and counties come to the Legislature on a case  
            by case basis.  

          5)Arguments in support.  Supporters argue that this bill gives  
            the voters the opportunity to decide whether to approve an  
            additional half percent sales tax in order to maintain city  
            services and allows the people to choose their own priorities.  
             

          6)Arguments in opposition.  Opposition argues that the current  
            2% threshold should be more than sufficient to meet the  
            revenue needs of a local community and that California already  
            has the highest sales tax in the nation.  

          7)Substantially amended.  The subject matter of this bill has  
            not been heard in any Assembly policy committee this  
            legislative session.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Misa Yokoi-Shelton / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958 


                                                               FN: 0004508 









                                                                  AB 1324
                                                                  Page  4