BILL ANALYSIS � 1
SENATE ENERGY, UTILITIES AND COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE
ALEX PADILLA, CHAIR
AB 1409 - Utilities and Commerce Hearing
Date: June 18, 2013 A
As Introduced: March 13, 2013 FISCAL B
1
4
0
9
DESCRIPTION
Current law permits the California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC) to charge and collect an application fee of $ for a
certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN), or for
the mortgage, lease, transfer, or assignment of a certificate.
Public Utilities Code 1904)
This bill eliminates the $75 fee and instead permits the CPUC to
set fee and adjust at an amount no greater than inflation.
This bill corrects incorrect code references to code sections
that were moved or repealed as a result of other enacted
statutes.
BACKGROUND
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity - The CPCN is a
permit issued by the CPUC for a regulated entity to do something
or to establish itself as a regulated entity. For instance an
electrical corporation needs a CPCN to construct a transmission
line or a substation, a water corporation must have one to build
a water facility and a telephone corporation needs a CPCN to
provide telephone landline service.
COMMENTS
The $75 fee to file an application for a CPCN for telephone
corporations and other utilities except for passenger state
corporations, and for the mortgage, lease, transfer, or
assignment of a CPCN has been in statute since 1969. The cost
of the CPCN application has not adjusted for inflation.
According to the PUC, the Consumer Price Index has increased
530.5% since 1969. If the application fee had been adjusted for
inflation, using the CPI calculator, the fee would be
approximately $473. Currently, the PUC does not have the
authority to raise the fee unless there is a change in statute
through legislative action, thus the creating the need for AB
1409.
The current CPCN application fee does not reflect the current
cost of PUC resources required to process the application. The
application requires extensive review and evaluation by an
Administrative Law Judge, is assigned to the Communications
Division to review tariffs and other technical aspects of the
application. Hearings may be required due to protest filed by
other parties or by the PUC's Consumer Protection and Safety
Division due to regulatory issues in another district, or a
California Environmental Quality Act review if the applicant is
proposing to build facilities. Depending on the initial review,
PUC staff may require the applicant to submit additional
information. After all the necessary information is provided, a
draft decision is prepared which may be sent out for a 30-day
comment period. The PUC will subsequently vote on the matter
after comments are addressed.
ASSEMBLY VOTES
Assembly Floor (50-21)
Assembly Appropriations Committee (12-5)
Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee
(10-5)
POSITIONS
Sponsor:
Author
Support:
California Public Utilities Commission
Oppose:
None on file.
Kellie Smith
AB 1409 Analysis
Hearing Date: June 18, 2013