BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          AB 1539 (Hagman) - Computer Science Content Standards
          
          Amended: As Proposed to be AmendedPolicy Vote: Education 6-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: August 14, 2014                                
          Consultant: Jacqueline Wong-Hernandez                       
          
          SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO AMENDED.
                     

          Bill Summary: AB 1539 requires the Instructional Quality  
          Commission (IQC) to consider developing and recommending to the  
          state board of education (SBE), on or before July 31, 2019,  
          computer science content standards for kindergarten - 12th  
          grade, as specified. This bill would further require the  
          Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI), in consultation with  
          the SBE, to consider convening a group of experts, as specified.

          Fiscal Impact (as approved on August 14, 2014): If a budget  
          appropriation is made for this purpose, the bill requires the  
          IQC to "consider" developing computer science content standards  
          and recommending them to the SBE. If the IQC decides to do so,  
          the costs and costs pressure are:
              Standards development: Significant costs to the California  
              Department of Education (CDE) to convene computer science  
              experts, contract for content writers, and staff the IQC  
              throughout the 2-year development of computer science  
              content standards for grades K-12. Costs over the 2-year  
              adoption period will total approximately $550,000 (General  
              Fund).
              Frameworks: Potentially substantial cost pressure to create  
              computer science curricular frameworks.
              Implementation: Offering computer science courses is  
              optional, and schools would be responsible for any costs  
              related to electing to offer them. 

          Background: Academic content standards define the knowledge,  
          concepts and skills that pupils should learn at each grade  
          level. Curricular frameworks serve as a blueprint for how to  
          implement the standards and provide guidance to publishers,  
          along with evaluation criteria, for the development of  
          instructional materials. The processes for the revision of  








          AB 1539 (Hagman)
          Page 1


          curricular frameworks and adoption of instructional materials  
          are suspended until the 2015-16 school year.  (EC � 60200.7)

          Existing law establishes the Academic Content Standards  
          Commission for the purpose of developing the Common Core  
          standards in English language arts and mathematics.  These  
          standards were adopted by the SBE on August 2, 2010. The SBE  
          adopted revised frameworks for Common Core mathematics on  
          November 6, 2013, and adopted revised frameworks for Common Core  
          English language arts on July 9, 2014.  (Education Code �  
          60605.8 and � 60207)

          Existing law requires the SPI to convene a group of science  
          experts to recommend science standards using the Next Generation  
          Science Standards. The SBE adopted these standards on September  
          4, 2013, and is required to consider the adoption of a revised  
          framework and evaluation criteria by January 31, 2016.  
          (EC � 60605.85 and � 60200.9)

          Proposed Law: This bill requires the IQC to consider developing  
          and recommending to the SBE computer science content standards  
          by July 31, 2019. To that end, this bill requires:

                    a)             The IQC to consider existing computer  
                    science content standards including the national K-12  
                    computer science content standards developed by the  
                    Computer Science Teachers Association.

                    b)             The IQC to consider content standards  
                    that include, but are not limited to, standards for  
                    teaching coding, as defined. 

                    c)             The SPI, in consultation with the SBE,  
                    to consider convening a group of experts in computer  
                    science, as specified.  

          This bill authorizes the computer science content standards to  
          be used by school districts to develop computer science programs  
          and course assessments, and specifies that the standards are not  
          mandatory.

          Related Legislation: AB 1530 (Chau) requires the SPI to consider  
          identifying, developing or revising model curriculum on computer  
          science for kindergarten - 6th grade. AB 1530 will also be heard  








          AB 1539 (Hagman)
          Page 2


          in this Committee on August 4, 2014.
          
          AB 2110 (Ting) requires the IQC to consider incorporating  
          computer science curriculum content into the mathematics,  
          science, history-social science, and English language arts  
          frameworks. AB 2110 will also be heard in this Committee on  
          August 4, 2014.

          Staff Comments: This bill requires the IQC to consider  
          developing and recommending to the SBE for adoption stand-alone  
          computer science content standards for grades K-12, including  
          coding standards. In order to develop content standards, the CDE  
          would contract with a writer to draft the standards, and then  
          would convene the group of computer science experts, required by  
          the bill, to revise the standards. The CDE estimates this would  
          result in contract costs of $140,000 (General Fund) over a  
          2-year period. Convening a large group of experts, as specified  
          in the bill, to revise the standards would incur additional  
          costs of approximately $54,000 (General Fund), primarily to  
          reimburse their travel costs.

          Staffing this process would require personnel specifically  
          assigned to this activity, to manage the contract and expert  
          work group, and to staff the IQC throughout the process. While  
          the exact costs will depend on CDE's interpretation of what it  
          must do, and how efficiently it completes that work, the  
          workload is sufficiently extensive as to expect approximately  
          $300,000 (General Fund) in costs for two .5 PYs over two years  
          and office technician support throughout the process. There will  
          likely be additional costs in the tens of thousands of dollars,  
          if the CDE publishes the new standards in hard copy.

          Committee Amendments would make this bill's requirements subject  
          to a Budget Act appropriation.