BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






                         SENATE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
                                Carol Liu, Chair
                           2013-2014 Regular Session
                                        

          BILL NO:       AB 1548
          AUTHOR:        Mullin
          AMENDED:       June 18, 2014
          FISCAL COMM:   Yes            HEARING DATE:  June 25, 2014
          URGENCY:       No             CONSULTANT:Daniel Alvarez

           SUBJECT  :  Standardized tests: reports.
          
           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires, until January 1, 2017, any agency that  
          administers standardized college admission tests to report  
          annually to the Superintendent of Public Instruction and  
          the Legislature regarding the number of test scores for  
          each type of standardized test that were canceled or  
          invalidated, and the associated reasons for cancellation or  
          invalidation.  The report is not to include identifiable  
          information on the test subjects.

           BACKGROUND  

          Current law imposes a number of requirements on test  
          sponsors or test agencies (defined as any individual,  
          partnership, corporation, association, company, firm,  
          institution, society, trust, or joint stock company) that  
          develop, sponsor or administer standardized tests (defined  
          as any test administered in California at the expense of  
          the test subject and used for purposes of admission to, or  
          class placement in, postsecondary institutions or their  
          programs, or preliminary preparation for those tests).  

          Current law also specifies that whenever the test agency  
          determines that substantial evidence exists to support  
          cancellation or invalidation of a test score, the test  
          agency shall provide the test subject with a choice of the  
          following options:

             a)   A cancellation of the test scores in question, with  









                                                               AB 1548
                                                                Page 2


               full refund of all test fees.
             b)   Opportunity to take the test again privately and  
               without charge.
             c)   Opportunity to seek judicial review of the matter.

          However, these options are not applicable in instances of  
          inadequate or improper test conditions.  Finally, current  
          law also provides that a test sponsor who violates any of  
          these provisions is liable for a civil penalty not to  
          exceed $750 per violation.  (Education Code � 99150 et.  
          seq.)

           ANALYSIS
           
          This bill requires, until January 1, 2017, any agency that  
          administers standardized college admission tests to report  
          annually to the Superintendent of Public Instruction and  
          the Legislature regarding the number of test scores for  
          each type of standardized test that were canceled or  
          invalidated, and the associated reasons for cancellation or  
          invalidation. The report is not to include identifiable  
          information on the test subjects.

          In addition, this bill requires that reporting currently  
          required under law to be sent to the California  
          Postsecondary Education Commission, now also be sent to the  
          Superintendent of Public Instruction and the Legislature  
          for review.

           STAFF COMMENTS  

           1)   Need for the bill  .  According to the author's office,  
               this bill will provide an annual report to the  
               Superintendent of Public Instruction and the  
               Legislature detailing the number of tests that were  
               cancelled for each kind of test administered the  
               previous year and for what reason they were cancelled.  


           2)   Genesis of this measure is related to noncompliance by  
               Mills High School of tests protocols  .  In May 2013,  










                                                               AB 1548
                                                                Page 3


               over 640 Advanced Placement (AP) exams taken by 286  
               Mills high school (San Mateo Union High School  
               District) students were invalidated.  The invalidation  
               was the result of testing irregularities - some  
               students were seated at round tables and not facing  
               the same direction - in violation of testing  
               protocols.   In August 2013, the US District Court for  
               Northern California denied an application for a  
               temporary restraining order and a motion for a  
               preliminary injunction seeking the reinstatement of  
               the invalidated AP test scores.  Among other things,  
               court documents indicate the San Mateo Union High  
               School District failed to administer some of the AP  
               exams in a manner consistent with the seating  
               requirements specified in the AP Coordinator's Manual.

           3)   Investigation of complaints requires cooperation by  
               all  .  Underlying the court decision was that the San  
               Mateo Union High School District did not comply with  
               the requirements of the AP Coordinator's Manual.   
               However, in this instance, upon a student's complaint  
               directly to the Educational Testing Service (ETS),  
               regarding among other things, seating irregularities,  
               the ETS commenced an investigation. The final results  
               of the investigation were significantly delayed due to  
               an inability to obtain information from key Mills High  
               school administrators, consequently the decision to  
               invalidate the AP exam scores did not occur until  
               early July 2013. 
                
                The College Board attempted to provide for retesting  
               immediately following completion of its investigation.  
               However, a mutually agreeable date, with the school,  
               could not be quickly scheduled thereby delaying  
               possible retests until August 2013. 

           4)   Opponents argue  that this legislation is in response  
               to a singular incident in which the school test  
               coordinator violated the test administration protocols  
               by seating students facing each other.  To  
               successfully implement standardized assessments,  










                                                               AB 1548
                                                                Page 4


               common test administration procedures must be followed  
               at all test sites to ensure that each student has fair  
               and equal testing conditions.   Annual reporting of  
               such isolated incidents would not address improper  
               test administration.

           5)   Related legislation  .  SB 915 (Hill) requires a test  
               agency to initiate an investigation upon learning of a  
               compliant or a notice of inadequate or improper test  
               conditions relating to the administration of the  
               Advanced Placement (AP) test.  In addition, this bill  
               requires the creation and preserving of seating  
               charts, as specified.  SB 915 passed this Committee on  
               8-0 vote, and is awaiting action in the Assembly.

           6)   It is unclear why the Legislature would need  to  
               receive voluminous amounts of information contained  
               within the requirements of Education Code sections  
               99152 and 99153, rather than appropriate education  
               entities already prescribed in the measure for  
               analysis and referral when necessary, therefore, staff  
               recommends amendments that: 

                           On page 2, line 4, after "commission"  
                    insert: "or successor entity"
                           On page 2, line 5, and strike "and the  
                    Legislature"
                           On page 2, line 13, after "commission"  
                    insert: "or successor entity"
                           On page 2, lin3 14, strike "and the  
                    Legislature"

           SUPPORT  

          None on file.

           OPPOSITION

           The College Board












                                                               AB 1548
                                                                Page 5