BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1556
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 9, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                    AB 1556 (Perea) - As Amended:  March 17, 2014 

          Policy Committee:                              InsuranceVote:8-2

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill codifies several changes to policies and practices of  
          the Employment Development Department (EDD) related to  
          unemployment and disability claims.  Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Requires EDD to translate webpages and key documents in  
            additional languages.

          2)Prohibits EDD from automatically halting the payment of  
            unemployment insurance (UI) benefits and requiring a  
            redetermination of eligibility when a claimant begins a  
            training or education program.

          3)Prohibits EDD from automatically halting the payment of UI  
            benefits and requiring a redetermination of eligibility until  
            a claim certification form is more than 21 days late.

          4)Requires the EDD director to periodically review the UI  
            program to identify policies and practices that delay benefit  
            payments, increase EDD workload, and provide little or no  
            value in identifying or preventing fraud in the UI program.   
            Requires EDD to provide the first review to the Legislature by  
            July 1, 2015.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Overall, this bill reflects current practice and has negligible  
          additional state costs.  

          Aside from the periodic review required in (4) above, the  
          changes in business practices codified by this bill are already  
          in various stages of implementation by EDD, as documented in two  








                                                                  AB 1556
                                                                  Page  2

          letters to the Assembly Insurance Committee dated January 7 and  
          March 25, 2014.  As the costs of these changes are already being  
          absorbed by EDD under their current administrative budget, no  
          additional fiscal impact is expected.  

          EDD may incur some additional costs to conduct the periodic  
          review and report as specified in the bill; however, as EDD  
          performs reviews of efficiency and effectiveness in the UI  
          program on an ongoing basis, these costs should also be minor  
          and absorbable within EDD's current administrative budget.  

          COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  . This bill ensures that policy changes implemented by  
            EDD as a result of a November 6, 2013 oversight hearing of the  
            Assembly Insurance Committee are reflected in statute, and  
            requires that EDD work to increase the efficiency of the UI  
            program on an ongoing basis.  The oversight hearing focused on  
            severe performance and customer service issues encountered in  
            September 2013 after EDD deployed a new computer system.  EDD  
            has since implemented numerous changes in order to improve the  
            UI system, and the department maintains it is committed to  
            continuous assessment and improvement. 
           
            2)Continuous Appropriation  . The Legislative Counsel digest  
            states this bill would "make changes to existing eligibility  
            requirements for unemployment compensation benefits that would  
            result in additional amounts being payable from the  
            Unemployment Fund." Since the UI fund is continuously  
            appropriated, the bill is tagged as making an appropriation.   
            However, this bill does not appear to actually change  
            eligibility criteria.  Instead, it codifies a current EDD  
            business practice related to eligibility redetermination when  
            an individual has enrolled in a training program.  Previously,  
            benefits for a claimant who stated he or she began a training  
            program were automatically terminated and the claimant was  
            forced into a redetermination process.  Existing law already  
            prohibits an unemployed individual from being disqualified for  
            benefits solely on the basis that he or she is a student.   
            Consistent with existing law, the new process used by EDD only  
            flags a claimant for redetermination if they indicate they  
            were not able to accept full-time work in connection with  
            beginning a training program.  This change, which is codified  
            in general terms by this bill, has reduced the number of cases  
            for which an eligibility determination is automatically  








                                                                  AB 1556
                                                                  Page  3

            triggered.  It does not, however, appear to change eligibility  
            rules. In practical terms, it may reduce inappropriate  
            terminations of benefits and result in some administrative  
            cost savings from fewer unnecessary redeterminations.   

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081