BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 1558
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1558 (Roger Hernández)
          As Introduced January 28, 2014
          Majority vote 

           HEALTH              19-0        APPROPRIATIONS      16-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Pan, Maienschein,         |Ayes:|Gatto, Bigelow,           |
          |     |Ammiano, Chau, Bonilla,   |     |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian  |
          |     |Bonta, Chávez, Chesbro,   |     |Calderon, Campos, Eggman, |
          |     |Gomez, Gonzalez, Roger    |     |Gomez, Holden, Jones,     |
          |     |Hernández, Lowenthal,     |     |Linder, Pan, Quirk,       |
          |     |Waldron, Nazarian,        |     |Ridley-Thomas, Wagner,    |
          |     |Nestande, Patterson,      |     |Weber                     |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Wagner,    |     |                          |
          |     |Wieckowski                |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Creates the California Health Data Organization (CHDO)  
          within the University of California (UC) to organize data  
          provided by health plans and insurers (carriers) on a Web site  
          to allow consumers to compare the prices paid for procedures, as  
          specified.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Requests UC to establish CHDO.  Creates various requirements  
            for CHDO, including:

             a)   Establish a carrier claims database, as specified;

             b)   Collect and organize carrier data into the following  
               categories:  i) charges and total amounts paid by carriers  
               and patients; ii) type of health care service; and, iii)  
               information relating to risk adjustment; and,

             c)   Disseminate information collected to the public through  
               an easily searchable Web site that allows for the  
               comparison of prices paid by carriers per procedure.

          2)Prohibits the data made available to the public from  
            containing any individually identifiable information.

          3)Authorizes CHDO to contract with a qualified, nongovernmental,  
            independent third party to obtain a commercially available  








                                                                  AB 1558
                                                                  Page  2


            claims dataset until CHDO collects its first set of data  
            directly from carriers.

          4)Requests UC to seek federal and private funding to cover  
            planning, implementation, and administration costs.   
            Authorizes CHDO to explore alternative sources of funding, to  
            the extent permitted by law, to ensure the sustainability of  
            CHDO.  Authorizes CHDO to receive and accept gifts, grants, or  
            donations from federal, state, and local government agencies,  
            individuals, associations, private foundations, and  
            corporation, in compliance with conflict-of-interest  
            provisions adopted at a public meeting.

          5)Authorizes CHDO to charge a reasonable fee to each person or  
            entity requesting access to data stored in the database, not  
            to exceed the actual costs of providing that access.  

          6)Requires CHDO to use the data collected to produce  
            geographically-aggregated annual reports on the cost of  
            specific ambulatory care procedures and services and inpatient  
            physician services.
          7)Requires carriers, as specified, to provide a copy of  
            explanations of benefits or explanations of review, as  
            specified, to the CHDO.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:

          1)Based on costs incurred by a similar project implemented in  
            Colorado, and assuming California's system costs 2.5 times as  
            much, estimated costs to UC to support an all-payer claims  
            database (APCD) in the following range (all costs are assumed  
            General Fund; a portion may be offset by federal grant funds  
            or fee revenues):  a) planning costs:  $5 million; b)  
            development and implementation costs:  $15 million; and, c)  
            ongoing maintenance costs:  $7.5 million.

          2)Costs to support other functions, including the development of  
            a searchable public Web site and consumer assistance, as well  
            as data provided for purchasers, could vary greatly based on  
            the sophistication and level of detail provided, but would  
            probably exceed $1 million for development.  Ongoing staff and  
            consulting costs would likely be in a similar range.









                                                                  AB 1558
                                                                  Page  3


          3)A portion of ongoing costs may be offset by fees for sale of  
            data products.  Colorado, for example, offset about 20% of  
            operating costs through the sale of data products.  

          4)Potential ongoing, likely minor, workload costs to the  
            California Department of Insurance (CDI) and the Department of  
            Managed Health Care for technical assistance and coordination,  
            depending on how CHDO implements the law and its data  
            collection and reporting methodologies.

           COMMENTS  :  APCDs are large-scale databases that systematically  
          collect medical claims, pharmacy claims, dental claims  
          (typically, but not always), and eligibility and provider files  
          from private and public payers.  Possible benefits of APCDs  
          include:  filling critical information gaps for state agencies;  
          supporting health care and payment reform initiatives; and  
          creating transparency for consumers, purchasers, and state  
          agencies.  APCDs have been established in Maine, Kansas,  
          Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Tennessee,  
          Utah, and Vermont.  

          In September 2013, CDI received a $5.2 million federal grant to  
          contract with an academic institution or other nonprofit  
          organization to establish a database of medical claims data that  
          incorporates claims data from private issuers, public payers,  
          and potentially, self-funded plans.  These data will be analyzed  
          to determine average prices for common medical procedures and  
          geographic differences in medical pricing.  The funds will also  
          be used to design a consumer-friendly Web site that presents  
          health pricing and quality information in an integrated manner.

          Supporters, which include consumer and labor groups, write that  
          many people who are newly eligible for subsidized health  
          coverage through the Affordable Care Act are unfamiliar with  
          health plan billing practices, and that this bill will lead to  
          greater transparency for consumers, an important feature for  
          consumers who are faced with decisions about when and how to  
          access critical services under their new health insurance  
          coverage.  

          Opponents, which include the California Hospital Association  
          (CHA) and the California Optometric Association, argue that this  
          bill should include safeguards that allow providers to ensure  
          quality and accuracy of reported information.  CHA further  








                                                                  AB 1558
                                                                  Page  4


          argues that the establishment of CHDO should include a robust  
          stakeholder process that is not included in this bill. 

           
          Analysis Prepared by  : Ben Russell / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 


                                                                FN: 0003769