BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1559
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 9, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                     AB 1559 (Pan) - As Amended:  March 19, 2014 

          Policy Committee:                              HealthVote:19-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the Department of Public Health (DPH) to  
          expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for  
          adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD).

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Annual estimated screening costs to the DPH Newborn Screening  
            (NBS) Program statewide of $4.5 million (Genetic Disease  
            Testing Fund).  This test is estimated to cost $9 per child. 

          2)Annual estimated costs to the Medi-Cal program of $2.3 million  
            (45% General Fund (GF), remainder federal funds). Medi-Cal  
            pays for approximately 50% of the births in the state, and  
            reimburses the NBS Program for screening costs associated with  
            Medi-Cal births.  

          3)Because ALD is a condition covered by the California  
            Children's Services (CCS) program, care costs for the majority  
            of children diagnosed with ALD are expected to be borne by the  
            state.  About 15 boys per year will be diagnosed and  
            monitored, and of these, about 5 would likely receive bone  
            marrow transplants at some point during their childhood.   

            Extremely small numbers make it difficult to predict any state  
            cost impacts with certainty.  However, given that boys who  
            manifest severe symptoms are likely to be covered by CCS, the  
            fiscal question is the costs of treating these boys earlier  
            versus later.  Early identification through NBS allows for  
            monitoring and treatment when the disease has barely  
            progressed.  Later identification does not impose monitoring  
            costs, but imposes greater treatment costs, as the disease has  








                                                                  AB 1559
                                                                  Page  2

            progressed further and medical risks are greater.   
            Furthermore, children treated after symptoms manifest are  
            likely to be experience permanent physical and cognitive  
            disability, which may make impose costs for other state  
            services, such as services provided through regional centers  
            or long-term care facilities. 

            It appears likely that with the imposition of the screening  
            test, monitoring of ALD-diagnosed children who otherwise would  
            not have been monitored will increase costs by a small amount,  
            likely less than $100,000 (GF/ federal) annually.  Treatment  
            costs in CCS associated with ALD would likely be similar to or  
            somewhat less than what CCS pays currently, with treatment  
            being provided to slightly more children, but with lower  
            costs, fewer risks, and better outcomes.  

            To the extent successful treatment avoids permanent disability  
            and reduces the number of children receiving services the  
            state would otherwise pay for, such as regional center or  
            long-term care services, unknown but potentially significant  
            annual GF cost savings are possible. 

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  . According to the author, the purpose of this bill is  
            to add ALD to the NBS Program.  The author contends that  
            although a federal advisory panel has not yet recommended all  
            states add ALD to their NBS panels, data from an ongoing pilot  
            study appears to support newborn screening as a mechanism for  
            early identification of ALD. ALD is a rare disease that causes  
            damage to the myelin sheath, an insulating membrane that  
            surrounds nerve cells in the brain.  The most severe symptoms  
            primarily affect males, and prevalence is estimated at 1 in  
            17,000 males.  

           2)Newborn Screening  . All states have newborn screening programs  
            for congenital diseases that benefit from early detection and  
            treatment. California began its NBS Program in 1966 with  
            testing for phenylketonuria (PKU).  Since then, numerous  
            conditions have been added to the programs as advancements in  
            medical science have produced screening and treatment options  
            for more diseases.  Screening tests have been added through  
            the budget process as well as through legislation directing  
            the department to add a specific disorder.  DPH is also  
            authorized to add conditions to the panel.  








                                                                  AB 1559
                                                                  Page  3


           3)Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP).  The RUSP is a list  
            of conditions every state is advised to include in their NBS  
            programs, including core conditions and secondary conditions.   
            The list is generated by the Discretionary Advisory Committee  
            on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children, a federal  
            expert advisory body that evaluates and makes recommendations  
            on the application of universal genetic screening tests.  This  
            federal committee conducts comprehensive evidence-based  
            assessments of conditions nominated to the RUSP.  For each  
            condition nominated, the committee reviews the available  
            evidence and data regarding the benefits and harms of  
            screening for the nominated condition.  The committee makes a  
            determination about the addition of the condition to the RUSP  
            on the basis of the magnitude and certainty of net benefit to  
            the population of screened newborns that could result from  
            testing and treatment. 

            California currently screens for all of 31 core conditions on  
            the RUSP.  Legislation in both 2011 and 2012 has added  
            conditions that are on the RUSP (see Prior Legislation).    

            ALD has been nominated for addition to the RUSP, but the  
            committee has not added it, citing insufficiency of data and  
            evidence.  However, the committee indicates ALD is "a  
            medically important disorder that deserves serious  
            consideration, possessing a well-established case definition  
            as well as screening, diagnostic, and treatment protocols."  
            The committee indicates it wishes to conduct an expedited  
            review once a large screening trial is complete, meaning the  
            disease may be added to the RUSP in the coming years if the  
            committee finds the results of the trial support the addition  
            of ALD. 
           
            4)Prior Legislation  .  AB 1731 (Block), Chapter 336, Statutes of  
            2012 required birthing hospitals to develop a screening  
            program for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) and to  
            offer parents of a newborn a test for CCHD prior to the  
            newborn's discharge.

            AB 395 (Pan), Chapter 461, Statutes of 2011 required DPH to  
            expand screening of newborns to include screening for severe  
            combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and, insofar as it does not  
            require additional costs, other T-cell lymphopenias detectable  
            as a result of screening for SCID.








                                                                  AB 1559
                                                                  Page  4


           Analysis Prepared by :    Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081