BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1586|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1586
          Author:   Holden (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/18/14 in Senate
          Vote:     21


           SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE  :  6-2, 6/10/14
          AYES:  Correa, De Le�n, Galgiani, Hernandez, Padilla, Torres
          NOES:  Cannella, Vidak
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Berryhill, Lieu, Vacancy

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 8/14/14
          AYES:  De Le�n, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters, Gaines

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  52-23, 5/27/14 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Public contracts:  hiring:  priority consideration

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill expands a hiring preference program for  
          specified state contracts that requires the contractor to give  
          "priority consideration," as defined, to specified individuals  
          when filling position vacancies funded by the contract.

           ANALYSIS :    Existing law requires that specified contracts, in  
          an amount that exceeds $200,000, entered into by any state  
          agency for services contain a provision requiring the contractor  
          to give priority consideration in filling vacancies in positions  
          funded by the contract to qualified recipients of California  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1586
                                                                     Page  
          2

          Work Opportunity and Responsibility for Kids (CalWORKs) program  
          aid.

          This bill:

          1.Expands a hiring preference program for specified state  
            contracts greater than $200,000 that require the contractor to  
            give priority consideration to the following individuals when  
            filling position vacancies funded by the contract:

             A.   Individuals receiving or who have exhausted unemployment  
               insurance benefits.

             B.   Individuals living in a targeted employment area (TEA),  
               where unemployment is at least 150% of the national  
               average.

          1.Defines "priority consideration" to mean that the contractor  
            shall consider a qualified job applicant, as determined by the  
            employer, who meets one or more of the criteria specified  
            above - or who meets the existing hiring criteria for  
            qualified participants in the CalWORKS program - and who apply  
            within five working days from the date on which the job  
            opening is listed with the Employment Development Department  
            (EDD). 

           Background

           Existing law authorizes individuals who are currently unemployed  
          or working part-time to apply to EDD for unemployment insurance  
          benefits.  An unemployment claim is effective for one year and  
          claimants can receive 12-26 weeks of full benefits.  During  
          periods of high unemployment, additional benefits may be granted  
          by Congress or the Legislature.  According to EDD statistics  
          from June 2014, there are more than 557,000 individuals  
          certifying for benefits on a regular unemployment claim in  
          California, and there are nearly 1,275,000 unemployed workers  
          who have exhausted benefits.

          Recently repealed statutes, the Enterprise Zone Act, defined a  
          "targeted employment area" as an area within a city or county  
          that is composed of census tracts designated by the U.S.  
          Department of Housing and Urban Development as having at least  
          51% of its residents of low- or moderate-income levels.  It is  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1586
                                                                     Page  
          3

          unknown how many Californians are residents of a TEA under the  
          former Enterprise Zone Act, but the San Francisco TEA alone  
          accounted for nearly 375,000 residents as of the 2010 census, so  
          it is likely that the statewide figure could be in the low  
          millions.

          This bill expands upon a current preference that gives priority  
          consideration to participants in the CalWORKS program for  
          vacancies in positions funded by state contracts in excess of  
          $200,000.  This bill includes two new categories for priority  
          consideration:  individuals who have exhausted unemployment  
          benefits; and individuals in TEAs.

          The original preference, established in 1984, sought to provide  
          a pathway for individuals receiving state welfare aid to  
          employment with contractors providing state services.  It was  
          intended to increase employment opportunities for those on  
          welfare while reducing the cost of the state's welfare  
          assistance.  EDD is unable to provide any data with which to  
          evaluate the success of the current program.

           Comments

           According to the author's office, the problem under existing law  
          is that people who are long-term unemployed may be discriminated  
          against when looking for work for various reasons.  Currently,  
          California faces an 8.3% unemployment rate meaning 3,154,000  
          Californians do not have jobs.

          This bill intends to help individuals who are on unemployment or  
          who have exhausted their unemployment benefits to obtain gainful  
          employment.  According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics  
          those who are considered to be long-term unemployed are  
          individuals that have been unemployed for more than 27 weeks.   
          Those who are long-term unemployed may face discrimination to  
          find employment because it is perceived by some employers that  
          if they have not been in the workforce for a certain amount of  
          time then they no longer obtain the skills to do work.  The U.S.  
          Bureau of Labor Statistics states that as of January 2014, there  
          are currently 3.6 million people that currently can be defined  
          as long-term unemployed.  The longer an individual stays  
          unemployed the less likely they are hired past 52 weeks.

          The author's office states that, in order to assist those facing  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1586
                                                                     Page  
          4

          discrimination because of a tough economy, this bill will help  
          qualified people who have been long-term unemployed to find  
          work.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

           Unknown, likely minor impact on state contracting costs.   
            There may be increased costs to the extent that a contractor's  
            costs to vet employment qualifications and determine  
            eligibility for priority consideration are built into bid  
            prices.  (General and special funds)

           There could be reduced costs to the state (Unemployment Fund)  
            if the bill results in the hiring of persons currently  
            receiving unemployment benefits who are not also currently  
            recipients of aid under the CalWORKs program.

           Likely minimal cost impacts on EDD because, unlike the current  
            requirements to notify CalWORKs recipients of available jobs,  
            this bill does not require EDD to notify persons residing in  
            TEAs, or those who receive or have exhausted unemployment  
            insurance benefits of available jobs related to a state  
            contract.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/13/14)

          Legal Services for Prisoners with Children
          National Association of Social Workers, California Chapter

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Legal Services for Prisoners with  
          Children notes that, despite the importance of access to  
          employment in preventing recidivism and promoting public safety,  
          qualified job applicants in California are often plagued by old  
          criminal records and discouraged from applying because of  
          discrimination by employers.  This bill ameliorates this  
          problem, they say, and California benefits when people with  
          criminal records are no longer shut out of jobs and can  
          financially support their families.

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  52-23, 5/27/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Ammiano, Bloom, Bocanegra, Bonilla,  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1586
                                                                     Page  
          5

            Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon, Campos, Chau,  
            Chesbro, Cooley, Dababneh, Dickinson, Eggman, Fong, Frazier,  
            Garcia, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Hall, Roger Hern�ndez,  
            Holden, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Lowenthal, Medina, Mullin,  
            Nazarian, Olsen, Pan, Perea, John A. P�rez, V. Manuel P�rez,  
            Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner,  
            Stone, Ting, Weber, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, Atkins
          NOES:  Allen, Bigelow, Ch�vez, Conway, Dahle, Donnelly, Beth  
            Gaines, Gatto, Gorell, Grove, Hagman, Harkey, Jones, Linder,  
            Logue, Maienschein, Mansoor, Melendez, Muratsuchi, Nestande,  
            Wagner, Waldron, Wilk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Daly, Fox, Patterson, Quirk-Silva, Vacancy


          MW:e  8/16/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****


























                                                                CONTINUED