BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1594
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 28, 2014

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
                                Wesley Chesbro, Chair
                   AB 1594 (Williams) - As Amended:  April 21, 2014
           
          SUBJECT  :   Solid waste:  recycling:  diversion:  green material

           SUMMARY  :  Specifies that green material (i.e., yard trimmings  
          and untreated wood wastes) used as alternative daily cover (ADC)  
          at a landfill does not constitute diversion and shall instead be  
          considered disposal beginning in 2020.  

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Establishes the California Integrated Waste Management Act of  
            1989, which: 

             a)   Specifies a state policy goal that 75 percent of solid  
               waste generated be diverted from landfill disposal by 2020.  


             b)   Requires each local jurisdiction to divert 50 percent of  
               solid waste from landfill disposal.

             c)   Requires a commercial waste generator, including  
               multi-family dwellings, to arrange for recycling services  
               and requires local governments to implement commercial  
               solid waste recycling programs designed to divert solid  
               waste from businesses. 

             d)   Specifies that "the use of solid waste (including green  
               material) for beneficial reuse in the construction and  
               operation of a solid waste landfill," including use of ADC,  
               is counted as diversion from landfill disposal. 

          2)Establishes the California Global Warming Solutions Act of  
            2006 (AB 32), which requires the California Air Resources  
            Board (ARB) to: 

             a)   Adopt regulations requiring the reporting and  
               verification of statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

             b)   Adopt a statewide GHG emissions limit equivalent to 1990  
               emissions levels by 2020.








                                                                  AB 1594
                                                                  Page  2


           THIS BILL  :  

          1)Specifies that on and after January 1, 2020, the use of green  
            material as ADC does not constitute diversion and shall be  
            considered disposal.  

          2)Prior to January 1, 2020, permits a city or county that will  
            not be in compliance with its diversion requirement as a  
            result of the use of green material as ADC to apply to  
            CalRecycle for one two-year extension, as specified.  

          3)Authorizes CalRecycle to grant extensions for individual  
            cities or counties.  
                 
           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :    

           1)Landfill cover  .  Landfill operators are required to cover all  
            solid waste at the end of each day to control odors, vectors,  
            fires, litter, and scavenging.  Federal regulations require  
            that cover consist of six inches of earthen materials, but  
            also permit operators to use alternative measures, generally  
            referred to as ADC.  Specific types of ADC authorized in  
            California include: geosynthetic fabric (tarps); sewage  
            sludge; ash and cement kiln dust; treated auto shredder waste  
            (auto fluff); foam products; contaminated sediment, dredge  
            soils, foundry sands, and energy exploration and production  
            waste;  compost materials; processed construction and  
            demolition waste; shredded tires; "spray applied cementitious  
            products;" and, green materials.     

          2)Background on green materials as ADC  .  In December 1993, after  
            more than a year of public discussion and consideration, the  
            California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) adopted  
            an ADC policy that would have allowed a limited amount of ADC  
            to count toward a jurisdiction's diversion rate.  The  
            implementation regulations for this policy were rejected by  
            the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) on the grounds that the  
            CIWMB did not have the statutory authority to limit ADC  
            diversion credit.  This OAL disapproval prompted the CIWMB to  
            formulate a new ADC policy at its January 1995 meeting.  The  
            new policy considered use of ADC to be diversion so long as  
            that use was approved by CIWMB and "not excessive."  This new  








                                                                  AB 1594
                                                                  Page  3

            policy included limiting the ADC diversion credit to the  
            "functional equivalent" of the earthen material used as daily  
            cover.

            In February 1996, the Sacramento Superior Court ruled in  
            Natural Resources Defense Council vs. the California  
            Integrated Waste Management Board that the regulations were  
            inconsistent with the Public Resources Code Section 41780,  
            which requires local jurisdictions to "divert" solid waste  
            from landfills through source reduction, recycling, and  
            composting activities.  The court also ruled that no recycling  
            activity at a landfill, including material recovery and  
            composting could be counted as diversion. 

            AB 1647 (Bustamante), Chapter 978, Statutes of 1996  
            established that local jurisdictions may use ADC as a strategy  
            to achieve their waste diversion goals.  This bill also  
            specified that recycling activities conducted at a landfill  
            are considered diversion.  

            In October 2013, CalRecycle released the Update on AB 341  
            Legislative Report:  Statewide Strategies to Achieve the 75  
            Percent Goal by 2020. The report outlines a "new recycling  
            rate" to measure progress toward the 75 percent goal, which  
            will not include "beneficial use of waste-derived materials at  
            landfills," including green materials used as ADC.  The report  
            is clear that the new measurement system will not affect how  
            individual jurisdiction's diversion rates are calculated.  

            While a large number of jurisdictions use green materials as  
            ADC, only 11 of the state's 416 jurisdictions would drop below  
            their required diversion rate if green materials used as ADC  
            no longer counted as diversion.  In order for CalRecycle to  
            pursue enforcement action, it would have to determine that the  
            city or county was also failing to make a "good faith effort"  
            to meet the state's diversion requirements.  

            In 2012 (the most recent data available), approximately 1.6  
            million tons of green material was used as ADC.  Use has  
            gradually decreased since 2005, when it peaked at  
            approximately 3 million tons.  

           3)Managing organics  .  CalRecycle is tasked with diverting at  
            least 75 percent of solid waste statewide by 2020.  Currently,  
            organic materials, including green waste, make up one-third of  








                                                                  AB 1594
                                                                  Page  4

            the waste stream (approximately 11 million tons) and food  
            continues to be the highest single category of disposal at  
            over 15 percent.  CalRecycle is also charged with implementing  
            its Strategic Directive 6.1, which calls for reducing organic  
            waste disposal by 50 percent by 2020.  According to  
            CalRecycle, significant gains in organic waste diversion are  
            necessary to meet the 75 percent goal and to implement  
            Strategic Directive 6.1.  Recycling technologies for organic  
            waste include composting, anaerobic digestion, and other types  
            of processing that generate renewable fuels, energy, soil  
            amendments, and mulch.

            Recycling organic waste provides significant GHG reductions  
            over landfilling.  Composting and other organics processing  
            technologies, including anaerobic digestion, reduce GHGs by  
            avoiding the emissions that would be generated by the  
            material's decomposition in a landfill.  Landfill gas is  
            generated by the decomposition of organic materials such as  
            food, paper, wood, and green material.  Fifty percent of  
            landfill gas is methane, a GHG that is 21 times more efficient  
            at trapping heat than carbon dioxide.  While most modern  
            landfills have systems in place to capture methane,  
            significant amounts continue to escape into the atmosphere.   
            According to ARB's GHG inventory, approximately 7 million tons  
            of CO2 equivalent are released annually by landfills.  That  
            number is expected to increase to 8.5 million tons of CO2  
            equivalent by 2020.

           4)This bill.   According to the author, "California is one of the  
            only states to allow the use of green material as landfill  
            cover and the only state to count cover material as  
            diverted-nearly half the states in the country have banned the  
            landfilling of this material all together.  Eliminating this  
            wasteful practice will help the State meet its environmental  
            goals, support the growth of agriculture, and create jobs."

           5)Suggested amendments  .  The committee  may wish to make the  
            following technical and clarifying amendments  :  

              a)   Revise page 3, lines 1 to 9 to read: 
              
                 (2) Commencing January 1, 2020, the use of green material  
                as alternative daily cover  , not including materials left  
               over from the composting process,  as alternative daily  
               cover  does not constitute diversion through recycling and  








                                                                  AB 1594
                                                                  Page  5

               shall be considered disposal for purposes of this division.  
                
                  (3) (A) If  , after January 1, 2020,  a local jurisdiction  
               will no longer be in compliance with Section 41780  after  
               January 1, 2020  as a result of using green material as  
               alternative daily cover, that jurisdiction, pursuant to  
               subparagraph (B), may  , before that date,  apply to the  
               department for  up to a  one extension of up to two-years   
                 two-year   extension   before that date  .  



             b)   Revise page 3, lines 28 to  31 to read: 

                (C) Upon receipt of an application pursuant to this  
               paragraph, the department may, at its sole discretion,  
               grant  as to  a local jurisdiction  up to a two-year delay   of   
               one extension for up to two-years from   the requirements  of   
                imposed by  paragraph (2).  


           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Agromin
          Association of Compost Producers
          Breathe California
          Biodegradable Products Institute
          California Biomass Energy Alliance
          California Climate and Agriculture Network 
          California Coastal Protection Network 
          California Compost Coalition
          California League of Conservation Voters
          California Organics Recycling Council
          California Resource Recovery Association
          Californians Against Waste
          Center for Biological Diversity
          City and County of San Francisco
          City of Thousand Oaks
          Clean Power Campaign
          CleanWorld
          Coalition for Clean Air
          Costa Mesa Sanitary District
          CR&R Environmental Services








                                                                  AB 1594
                                                                  Page  6

          Ecology Center
          Environment California
          Frank M. Booth Design Build Company
          Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives
          Global Green USA
          GrassRoots Recycling Network
          Green Waste Recovery
          Greenaction for Health and Environmental Justice
          Integrated Waste Management Consulting
          Laane
          Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy
          Napa Recycling & Waste Services
          Napa Recycling Compost
          Natural Resources Defense Council 
          NatureWorks, LLC
          Northern California Compost
          Northern California Recycling Association
          Northern Recycling Compost
          Peabody Engineering
          Planning and Conservation League
          Quackenbush Mountain Compost
          Recology
          Sierra Club California
          Sonoma Compost
          Synergex International
          Tracy Delta Compost
          Upper Valley Recycling Compost
          US Composting Council
          Vasko Electric, Inc.  
          Z-Best Composting

           Opposition 
           
          Family Winemakers of California
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Elizabeth MacMillan / NAT. RES. / (916)  
          319-2092