BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          AB 1597 (Assembly Agriculture Committee) - Food and Agriculture
          
          Amended: June 3, 2014           Policy Vote: Agriculture 5-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: June 30, 2014                             
          Consultant: Robert Ingenito     
          
          This bill does not meet the criteria for referral to the  
          Suspense File.


          Bill Summary: AB 1597 is an omnibus bill that would (1) extend  
          the sunset date to January 1, 2020 for standardization program  
          provisions for fruits, nuts and vegetables, and (2) conform  
          state law to a new federal regulation addressing required  
          medical documents for horses and other equines when crossing  
          state borders. 

          Fiscal Impact: The California Department of Food and Agriculture  
          (CDFA) indicates that its costs to administer the  
          standardization program total roughly $2 million annually, and  
          are funded by assessments on shipped packages of fruits, nuts  
          and vegetables. The bill's provisions related to horses would  
          also not impact CDFA's fiscal operations.

          Background: The fruit and vegetable standardization program is  
          designed to remove fruits and vegetables not complying with  
          minimum standards (such as quality, size, maturity, labeling,  
          and packing). The program protects consumers from immature  
          marketplace agricultural products and products that may  
          prematurely rot or spoil due to packing damage.

          In order to prevent the spread of infectious diseases, current  
          law requires verification that animals brought into the State do  
          not exhibit evidence of any communicable disease.  Currently,  
          horses and other equines brought into California must (1) obtain  
          a Certificate of Veterinary Inspection (CVI) issued within 30  
          days of entry, and (2) must verify, through tests performed by  
          an accredited veterinarian within the previous 12 months, that  
          the animal is free of equine infectious anemia.  

          Current a law provides an exemption from these requirements for  








          AB 1597 (Assembly Agriculture Committee)
          Page 1


          equines originating in California when traveling to other states  
          and returning within 14 days.  A recent federal regulation was  
          adopted that requires all equines, with specified exceptions, to  
          be accompanied by a CVI when crossing state lines (78 FR 2071,  
          January 9, 2013; 9 CFR �86.5 (f)).  Therefore, California's  
          exemption is not permissible and must be removed in order to  
          comply with federal regulations.

          Proposed Law: This bill would do the following:

                 Extend from January 1, 2015 to January 1, 2020 the  
               repeal date for provisions of the fruit, nut, and vegetable  
               standardization program.

                 Require horses and other equines traveling from  
               California to another state and returning within 14 days to  
               obtain a certificate of health and a negative test for  
               equine infectious anemia dated within the previous 12  
               months.
          

          Related Legislation:  AB 945 (Agriculture), Chapter 262,  
          Statutes of 2009.  Extended the repeal date for provisions of  
          the fruit, nut, and vegetable standardization program to January  
          1, 2015.
            
          Staff Comments: Any local government costs resulting from the  
          mandate in this measure are not state-reimbursable because the  
          mandate only involves the definition of a crime or the penalty  
          for conviction of a crime.