BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          AB 1602 (Patterson) - Vending machines: business enterprises for  
          the blind.
          
          Amended: March 13, 2014         Policy Vote: T&H 11-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: June 30, 2014                             
          Consultant: Mark McKenzie       
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. 

          
          Bill Summary: AB 1602 would require the Department of  
          Transportation (Caltrans) to pay for all utility costs  
          associated with vending machines at roadside rest areas  
          operating under the Business Enterprise Program for the Blind  
          (BEP). 

          Fiscal Impact: Estimated ongoing costs of approximately $200,000  
          to $250,000 annually for Caltrans to pay vending machine utility  
          costs at all roadside rest areas (State Highway Account).

          Background: Existing law requires Caltrans to authorize the  
          placement of vending machines at roadside rest areas and to give  
          preference for vending facilities to vendors operating under the  
          BEP.  Existing law requires vendors to reimburse Caltrans from  
          vending machine revenues for the costs of maintenance,  
          operations, design review, and other activities related to the  
          operation of the machines.   

          According to a 2013 Department of Rehabilitation (DOR) annual  
          report on the BEP, 17 blind vendors operated vending facilities  
          at 30 locations along interstate highways in California, selling  
          sell items such as refrigerated soft drinks, snacks, ice cream,  
          and hot beverages from these machines.  The vending machine  
          receipts at these sights totaled over $850,000 in 2013.  

          Proposed Law: AB 1602 would prohibit Caltrans from being  
          reimbursed for utility costs incurred by vendors operating under  
          the BEP and instead require Caltrans to pay for those utility  
          costs using state funds.  Utility costs include fees incurred  
          for providing electricity, water, sewage, and other similar  
          services.








          AB 1602 (Patterson)
          Page 1



          Staff Comments:  The current interagency agreement between DOR  
          and Caltrans requires vendors to pay for utility costs at  
          roadside rest areas.  Monthly utility costs depend primarily on  
          the number and type of vending machine, whether the machines  
          require refrigeration or heating, whether the machines are  
          indoor or outdoor, utility rates at each site, the season, and  
          the climate of the region in which the rest area is located.   
          According to the author, electricity costs can range from about  
          $350 to $900 per month, depending on these factors.  

          Caltrans has completed installation of electric meters at 10 of  
          the sites at a cost of about $600,000, and the vendors operating  
          at these locations pay utility costs directly to the electricity  
          provider. At the remaining sites, the interagency agreement  
          requires vendors to pay $200 per month per vending site and DOR  
          reimburses Caltrans for the balance of electricity costs. Plans  
          to convert all vending locations to independent meters are in  
          process.  Under this bill, Caltrans would be required to pay  
          utility costs associated with vending machines at all roadside  
          rest areas.  These costs are estimated to be in the range of  
          $200,000 to $250,000 annually.  The bill would result in a  
          substantial increase in profit for vendors, as a percentage of  
          sales, at the expense of the state.