BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1613
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 21, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                     AB 1613 (Stone) - As Amended:  May 7, 2014 

          Policy Committee:                              Human  
          ServicesVote:5 - 0 

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill establishes cost-effective thresholds for the  
          collection of CalWORKs overpayments. Specifically, this bill:

          1)Prohibits a county from establishing an overpayment if the  
            amount of the overpayment is less than $125 or a higher  
            threshold established by the Department of Social Services  
            (DSS), or if the costs of collecting the overpayment are  
            expected to exceed the average amounts to be recovered by the  
            county.

          2)Authorizes DSS to establish a minimum cost-effectiveness  
            threshold for collecting CalWORKs overpayments that is greater  
            than $125 and requires counties to implement the new threshold  
            developed by DSS.

          3)Clarifies that administrative actions cannot be commenced  
            against any person based on alleged unlawful or erroneous  
            application for or receipt of CalWORKs aid once the case  
            record has been destroyed after the expiration of the  
            three-year retention period.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Minor revenue loss (GF) to DSS from the reduced ability to  
            collect overpayments, likely offset by efficiencies gained  
            through reduced workload associated with not pursuing all  
            overpayments. 

          2)One-time costs for changes to the Statewide Automated Welfare  
            System (SAWS). These costs should be minor and absorbable  








                                                                  AB 1613
                                                                  Page  2

            within the existing SAWS Maintenance and Operations budget. 

          3)Potential GF savings to the extent there is corresponding  
            reduction in the requests for state hearings regarding  
            overpayments.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  . Advocates note that county administrative costs  
            around notifying a family of an overpayment, collecting the  
            overpayment through reducing future grants, and potentially  
            going to a state hearing if the overpayment is contested, all  
            likely exceed the amount of overpayment being sought.  By  
            establishing a statutory threshold for the collection of  
            overpayments and requiring that counties not spend more to  
            recover the overpayment than the overpaid amount is actually  
            worth, this bill seeks to improve administrative efficiency  
            regarding the collection of CalWORKs overpayments due to error  
            while reducing undue hardship for needy families receiving  
            aid.

           2)Background  . Under current law, overpayments of CalWORKs aid  
            due to administrative errors made by a county agency are  
            collected through a 5% reduction in maximum aid payment the  
            family could receive based on family size (not what they  
            actually receive), for each month until the full amount of the  
            overpayment is recouped. This approach results in a reduction  
            amount that often exceeds 5% of what the family receives and  
            can result in undue hardship for families. If the family  
            chooses to contest the overpayment through a state hearing,  
            the county could spend around $1,025 on the hearing,  
            regardless of whether the administrative law judge rules in  
            favor of the county or rules in favor of the recipient if, for  
            example, overpayment recovery would cause the family hardship.  
             

           3)Prior Legislation  . SB 1391 (Liu), Chapter 491, Statutes of  
            2012, instituted a similar new process for the collection of  
            CalFresh over-issuances.



           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081 









                                                                  AB 1613
                                                                  Page  3