BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1638
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 7, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                  AB 1638 (Bocanegra) - As Amended:  April 21, 2014 

          Policy Committee:                              InsuranceVote:9-3

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill allows employees of government and non-profit  
          educational institutions who are not in an instructional or  
          administrative role to collect unemployment insurance (UI)  
          compensation benefits between school years, regardless of  
          whether they have a reasonable assurance of employment.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)There are approximately 250,000 non-certificated, classified  
            employees throughout the state. If 60% of those employees  
            received 8 weeks of UI during summer vacation each year, it  
            would cost approximately $360 million (School Employees Fund).  
             Costs to the School Employees Fund are funded by school  
            districts, county offices of education, community college  
            districts, and charter schools, whose employees receive UI  
            benefits through this fund instead of through the UI Trust  
            Fund.

          2)The increased costs in UI for these workers would likely  
            increase the quarterly Local Experience Charge paid by the  
            school districts.  It is unknown how much those costs would  
            increase, but increased costs could easily exceed millions of  
            dollars throughout all the school districts across the state. 

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale . According to the author, thousands of school  
            employees find the months between academic years to be a  
            stressful period financially. Existing law prohibits certain  
            education employees, those who are not teachers, researchers,  
            or administrators, from receiving benefits during months in  








                                                                  AB 1638
                                                                  Page  2

            which school is not in session, unless they meet very specific  
            criteria. Many school employees rely on summer school to  
            maintain a reliable income source. Since 2007, however, budget  
            cuts have led to the elimination of summer school in many  
            districts, leaving tens of thousands of education employees  
            without a steady income or access to unemployment insurance  
            benefits. This bill would allow those employees to receive  
            unemployment insurance during the summer break between school  
            years.

           2)Federal Law  .  Federal law generally requires equal treatment  
            for the payment of UI benefits to certain nonprofit  
            organizations, Indian tribes, and state and local government  
            workers in the same amount, on the same terms, and subject to  
            the same conditions, as other workers subject to state law. An  
            exception to the equal treatment requirement pertains to the  
            denial of UI for professional and nonprofessional employees of  
            educational institutions during a period between or within  
            academic years or terms when there is a contract or reasonable  
            assurance that the employee will go back to work in the same  
            or similar capacity in the ensuing academic year or term.  

            States must deny UI benefits to professional school employees  
            between and within the academic years or terms when a contract  
            or reasonable assurance exists. However, states have the  
            option of providing UI benefits to nonprofessional school  
            employees between and within the academic years or terms when  
            a contract or reasonable assurance exists. 

           3)School Employees Fund (SEF)  . Public school employers, K-12 and  
            community colleges may elect to participate in the School  
            Employees Fund, which is a pooled-risk fund administered by  
            the Employment Development Department, which collects  
            quarterly contributions based upon a percentage of total wages  
            paid by public schools and community college districts.   
            Employers who participate in the SEF may also have to pay an  
            additional quarterly Local experience charge if they have  
            higher UI costs charged to their individual accounts. 

            Contributions deposited in the School Employees Fund are used  
            to reimburse the UI Trust Fund for the cost of UI benefits  
            paid to former employees. The SEF had a projected fund balance  
            of $363 million at the end of the 2013-13 fiscal year. 

           4)Previous Legislation  .  AB 615 (Bocanegra) of 2013 is nearly  








                                                                  AB 1638
                                                                  Page  3

            identical to this bill, and was held on the Suspense File of  
            this committee.  

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081