BILL ANALYSIS �
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1673|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 1673
Author: Garcia (D), et al.
Amended: 8/13/14 in Senate
Vote: 27
SENATE ELECTIONS & CONST. AMEND. COMM. : 5-0, 6/24/14
AYES: Padilla, Anderson, Hancock, Jackson, Pavley
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 75-0, 5/8/14 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT : Political Reform Act of 1974: contributions
SOURCE : Author
DIGEST : This bill revises the definition of contribution to
include a payment made by a lobbyist or a cohabitant of a
lobbyist for costs related to a fundraising event held at the
home of the lobbyist, as specified. This bill makes these
payments attributable to the lobbyist for purposes of the
prohibition against a lobbyist making a contribution to
specified candidates and elected officers.
Senate Floor Amendments of 8/13/14 make AB 1673 identical to SB
1441 (Lara) in order to reconcile conflicts.
ANALYSIS :
Existing law:
CONTINUED
AB 1673
Page
2
1. Provides, pursuant to the Political Reform Act (PRA),
provides for the comprehensive regulation of campaign
financing, including requiring the reporting of campaign
contributions and expenditures and imposing other reporting
and recordkeeping requirements on campaign committees.
2. Defines "contribution" for purposes of the PRA as a payment,
a forgiveness of a loan, a payment of a loan by a third
party, or an enforceable promise to make a payment, except to
the extent that full and adequate consideration is received,
unless it is clear from the surrounding circumstances that it
is not made for political purposes.
3. Does not include in the definition of "contribution" a
payment made by an occupant of a home or office for costs
related to any meeting or fundraising event held in the
occupant's home or office if the costs for the meeting or
fundraising event are $500 or less.
4. Prohibits a lobbyist from making, and an elected state
officer or candidate for elective state office from
accepting, a contribution if the lobbyist is registered to
lobby the governmental agency for which the candidate is
seeking election or the governmental agency of the elected
state officer.
This bill:
1. Revises the definition of "contribution" to include a payment
made by a lobbyist or a cohabitant of a lobbyist for costs
related to a fundraising event held at the home of the
lobbyist, as specified. This bill makes these payments
attributable to the lobbyist for purposes of the prohibition
against a lobbyist making a contribution to specified
candidates and elected officers.
2. Revises the definition of "contribution" to include a payment
made by a lobbying firm for costs related to a fundraising
event held at the office of the lobbying firm.
Background
Hosted Fundraisers . The PRA, among other things, requires
CONTINUED
AB 1673
Page
3
candidates and committees to disclose contributions made and
received and expenditures made in connection with campaign
activities. The term "contribution" is defined as any payment
for political purposes for which full and adequate consideration
is not provided to the donor.
When individuals or entities make payments in connection with
holding a fundraiser for a candidate, such payments ordinarily
are considered contributions to the candidate. However, current
law allows for some exceptions. For example, payments made by
the occupant of a home or office for costs related to any
meeting or fundraising event in the occupant's home or office
are not considered contributions under the PRA if the costs for
the meeting or fundraising event are $500 or less.
Although existing law prohibits lobbyists from making
contributions to elected state officers or candidates for
elected state office if that lobbyist is registered to lobby the
governmental agency for which the candidate is seeking election
or the governmental agency of the elected state officer, the
exception to the definition of the term "contribution" for the
purposes of hosted fundraising events does not exclude events
hosted by lobbyists. As a result, a lobbyist could hold a
fundraiser at his/her home and the cost would not be considered
a contribution, as long as the total cost of such an event did
not exceed $500. If other parties donate money or goods in
connection with the event, their payments must also be counted
to determine if $500 has been spent in connection with the
fundraiser. This includes goods or services provided by the
candidate or any other person attending the event. If the cost
of the event exceeds $500, all payments are counted as
contributions.
Recent Events . In February of this year, the Fair Political
Practices Commission (FPPC) approved a settlement in a case in
which a registered lobbyist hosted campaign fundraisers for
state elective officers and candidates at his house where he
provided items such as beverages, flower arrangements, and
cigars. The FPPC investigated and determined that the total
cost of the fundraisers hosted by the lobbyist at his home,
including the value the items provided by the lobbyist, exceeded
$500. As a result, the items provided by the lobbyist during
the fundraisers constituted non-monetary contributions to the
campaign committees of the elective officers and candidates who
CONTINUED
AB 1673
Page
4
benefitted from the fundraisers - all violations of the PRA. As
a result, the FPPC levied one of the largest penalties against a
lobbyist and issued warning letters to the elected officers and
candidates who benefitted from the fundraisers.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: Yes
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, minor
absorbable enforcement costs to the FPPC (General Fund).
SUPPORT : (Verified 8/14/14)
California Common Cause
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 75-0, 5/8/14
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Bigelow, Bloom,
Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian
Calderon, Campos, Chau, Ch�vez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,
Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Fong, Fox,
Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,
Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hern�ndez, Holden,
Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal,
Maienschein, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian,
Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Quirk-Silva,
Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting,
Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada,
John A. P�rez
NO VOTE RECORDED: Eggman, Gorell, Mansoor, V. Manuel P�rez,
Vacancy
RM:d 8/14/14 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****
CONTINUED